- May 16, 2017
- 5
- 4
My apologies, I think I got the cause and effect you were describing backwards. I think I assumed you meant they didn’t have Office Party ready, and were thus stretching out House Party content to keep the lights on, where I now think you mean it the other way around, that you believe they’re dragging their feet on Office Party content because House Party is still profitable for less work. I believe what threw me was the comment about the hypothetical person wondering why one wouldn’t start working on a new project when the old one was done, which you admit not even Eek are doing. It seemed to me that you were saying it’s o.k. to work on two projects at once (meaning also work on House Party) in the first half of your comment, and were thus criticizing Eek for not being able to do that (which, to be clear, you just clarified that is not what you meant).Yes. My perspective is that I do not agree at all with the way the developers of House Party (so far) have dealt with any of their content. I think it was wrong, wrong, wrong. Do I want "more" content? Sure. But please, not within this current game that's already kinda stale (just my humble opinion). They truly should move on.
I'm not entirely sure where you got that notion from, that made you believe I think they should continue with House Party content. Maybe I was drunk, idk, but I think I never said anything like that. I actually despise many of their decisions. And I wish they would just "call it a day" and move on to the next project.
I was definitely the one confused, but I appreciate the extra explanation!