Its not a fight, you just dont like that I think you're wrong and I clearly expressing it, thats all.
I could say the same about you. You haven't even addressed the fact that:
A) You only test on YOUR system, and I am having the reverse experience as you where HP runs great on my system, and other games I have issues with. You somehow think you're an armchair expert and you have a magical benchmark system that is appropriate for assessing everybody else's experience.
B) All hardware is different, and I have different findings than you. I even went and checked out that Green Hell game, and it runs choppy for me on full settings (not insanely choppy but it lags here and there), yet I don't have a problem with House Party. House Party is a much smoother experience for me in this case. Games can get bottle-necked in many different places, and I happen to not get bottle-necked on this game anywhere, and for other games, that's not always the case. Somehow it completely escapes you that it's possible that your hardware might yield different results than others that play this game, and I am just trying to inform people that your personal subjective experience is not what everybody else will necessarily encounter.
Taking shots at you....right. I guess I am not allowed to prevent someone from being misinformed when you tell them that the game is great, amazing, awesome optimization etc.
I do enjoy the game, but I never once said the game had awesome optimization. Maybe the issue is reading comprehension with you. I have always agreed that running it on Ultra is no joke, and that some systems won't be able to handle it, which is why I recommended going down to a setting that works. What I've been saying from the beginning, is that it's much better NOW than it was before, yet you some how read that as "This game is amazing and has the best optimization of any game ever!". Read what I actually say before you decide that I'm wrong.
I only said that the game has gotten much better with optimization over time, and there are plenty of other people posting the same to collaborate that. You're the one acting like my two year old system is a high-end supercomputer. I have a middle of the road system at best. You can buy my system for under $1000 right now. If you're looking to have an amazing 3D gaming experience on a game with a system less than $1000 it's not going to happen with many games, not just House Party. But if you have a fairly modern system (not "high end"), this game runs fine.
Ok, at least decide, did I answer his question, or didnt I? Because first you say that I didnt even answer his question, and then that I said the same thing you said.
Again. Reading comprehension. It's not that hard. His question was whether or not the game has gotten better in terms of optimization over time. You did NOT answer that question. I did. I went on to say that he could probably find something that works because there are a lot of quality level options, which you repeated AFTER saying don't listen to me. It's LITERALLY right above.
The problem here is that you have a real difficulty understanding simple things, keep missing nearly every point, and just want to believe the thing you already believe.
This is called confirmation bias, and what's ironic is that you have it so hard for this game it's not even funny. You already decided what you want to believe after testing on your ONE system, and now you only look for evidence to support it and dismiss evidence against it. You then assume everybody will draw the same results as you. You're wrong, and you won't accept my data because it goes against your belief that you've already formed. It's pretty simple to see from your posts, because you've even gone as far as to CHANGE what I actually am saying so that you can argue points that I didn't even make.
Burden of proof is on the positive claim, and you're the one making these claims and not accepting any evidence to the contrary, and then you accuse me of being biased? Sure buddy.
