...I mean, it's a 0.1 release. It ain't the full game. I think this complaint would be more justified if it was at least 0.5 release or something, but it's literally the first release of the game.
I was refering to "reviews". Here is reviews quotes:
"Very early but so far it is a well thought out story a bit of a slow burn which is always appreciated in netorase! "
- Game have like 30 min of gameplay so what slow burn?
"It's in a very early state but I can expect a lot from this game, despite the little content, it is one of the best netorase games I have played.
You can see how everything progresses slowly until finally the protagonist's partner will opens up to protagonist fetish in future versions"
- This is the best netorase games guy have played. Sarcasm.jpg
And he also played future versions because he is reviewing this future versions.
Is it promising game? Yes. Does it have content some randoms is waxing poetics in reviews? No.
Did this reviewers mentioned 30 min of content with 2,5 scenes and horrible QoL of game? No.
Does it deserve full 5 stars? Deside yourself.