- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure ahegao anal sex animated bdsm big tits corruption cosplay creampie exhibitionism fantasy female domination footjob handjob humiliation humor interracial lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game monster girl oral sex parody point & click puzzle romance sex toys spanking stripping teasing tentacles titfuck trainer vaginal sex voyeurism
- May 6, 2017
- 3,981
- 30,795
- 643
Ahh, OK, I see where the disconnect is, let me explain with examples. Since by your own admission, you're the one reporting people:
"Hey, look out! That guy is going to stab you!" <---- This is helpful
"I'm going to stab you." <---- This is threatening
Granted, I'm not a lawyer so it's possible I could be completely wrong about this and everything else.
You just like to argue apparently, awesome. Makes sense.Ahh, OK, I see where the disconnect is, let me explain with examples. Since by your own admission, you're the one reporting people:
"Hey, look out! That guy is going to stab you!" <---- This is helpful
"I'm going to stab you." <---- This is threatening
Granted, I'm not a lawyer so it's possible I could be completely wrong about this and everything else.
uchihafabio
Active Member
- Sep 10, 2017
- 678
- 645
- 307
I am no lawyer either but I know a copyright expert who works on youtube by helping the non lawyers about copyright. You really should search for him. He should help us against bulliesAhh, OK, I see where the disconnect is, let me explain with examples. Since by your own admission, you're the one reporting people:
"Hey, look out! That guy is going to stab you!" <---- This is helpful
"I'm going to stab you." <---- This is threatening
Granted, I'm not a lawyer so it's possible I could be completely wrong about this and everything else.
- May 6, 2017
- 3,981
- 30,795
- 643
Now I'm confused. I was simply responding to you threatening our members; you insisted you weren't threatening but instead "trying to help" and I explained the difference between what you say you did and what you actually did.
Wait, is this another thing I can't understand because I'm not a lawyer? I'm really starting to question my life choices here.
LiefdeJood
Newbie
- Sep 13, 2017
- 78
- 107
- 110
Yikes. Time to throw this game in the bin. A dev making a parody game threatening its users with an ip-ban.. I've never seen something that ironic yet stupid. I hope that all the patrons find their worth because I'm not going to bother with it again. God speed to you all & to the mod that bothered to talk with an insanely ironic, milking dev.
Us or F95? For F95, seems the uploaders didn't use that site this time. We have moved to website only downloads with the Patreon API.
Darth Nyvol
New Member
- Aug 3, 2019
- 7
- 21
- 188
Don't you find strange that dev that used free software go on that we are stealing his property as if he was getting paid for his service. Everything that they are using is free to use as long you do not make profit from it. A lot of you stated that is a scam, well I think you are half right. It's more a money laundering scam. They take in over 10000 dollars a month and that why they are taking their time, because I can't see any one staying on Patreon for more than few months. According the web site they have only 1700 donors and they get that much money for a broken game. I guess that many of them have more money than sense.
This shit got fucking in it yet? I've spent too many hours grinding in this game, doing all the mind numbing ways to progress the story, with no payout. Lemme know if its worth it.
Laseron22
Newbie
- Jan 17, 2018
- 73
- 85
- 146
Also it's quite ironic that porn production is illegal in his country.
Last edited:
Miðgarðsormr
Engaged Member
- Oct 1, 2017
- 2,473
- 6,120
- 671
You might wanna rethink that logic of yours.
In 2011, Rowling's team of lawyers
You must be registered to see the links
— and won!And i quote:
Plaintiffs have shown that the lexicon copies a sufficient quantity of the Harry Potter series to support a finding of substantial similarity between the Lexicon and Rowling’s novels,” Judge Robert P. Patterson Jr. of Federal District Court in Manhattan wrote in his 68-page ruling blocking publication of a Harry Potter Lexicon written by Steven Jan Vander Ark." Quote end.
The owners of Harry Potter stuff are Rowling, WB and NBCUniversal. I leave it up to you to google who and what for they sued the living shit out of people already.
And how exactly is bringing people into trouble helping? Did i miss something or is today the opposite day?
Last edited:
jackofshadows
Member
- May 24, 2018
- 328
- 622
- 222
What a pile of bullshit. Even youtube kids these days have enough knowledge to understand the copyright "issue" here. And if you want to be "helpful" you can simply remind your patrons to download release only from your sources, not try to restrict all the others instead, it's retarded. The Web doesn't work like that, this site is a good illustration to it, you should try to explore it, go deeper, you know?
Last edited: