- Sep 30, 2018
- 595
- 793
Is it really crying to expect an artist to...I don't know...do the art themselves?Hes not Switching And btw His Supporters on Patreon dont care... Only the Cry babies that never Pay a cent Cry on Twitter sure..
AI art is still trash and they should not be monetizing it at all. They did none of the work, they typed in a few keywords and hit "start"You must be registered to see the links
Generally, i want to know your opinion about AI. Animations are the main content and that will never change.
Thats his post to a Poll.And to be Honest i dont care if a Artist is Doing AI Pics..
Idk about "switching", I saw some 2d/3d artists tried it, and they all got shit on.
Some of them stopped, some started alt accounts. I'm ok with alt accounts for it
I'm even ok with ppl which exclusively do it, kinda, I just ignore them.
But when you established artist with consistent content, ppl being subbed for years, and you started AI
Idk if this is what your audience want. And he did it paywalled...
I don't mind the use of the AI if it only use as a assist tool to make things people hate doing (IE: creating backgrounds). If they are an established artist that are using it for 100% of their work. Then people have a right to complain about it because that not what people sign up for. Especially when it paywalled.Yep, fuck AI and anyone using it.
Its a no brainer that supporters on Patreon aren't gonna risk getting block and lose out on Paywall content for criticizing the creator. Which is why you rarely see people "crying" on their Patreon pages.His Supporters on Patreon dont care... Only the Cry babies that never Pay a cent Cry on Twitter sure..
People going on an INTERNET forum, dedicated to COMPUTER-GENERATED porn, to push luddite talking points. Jesus.Yep, fuck AI and anyone using it.
The problem is, it isn't really right to use it and paywall it as an artist. All they do is type in key words and hit "start" and the AI spits it out. People who do pay for the work, should expect the artist to do the actual work, not a machine copying different styles.People going on an INTERNET forum, dedicated to COMPUTER-GENERATED porn, to push luddite talking points. Jesus.
But it is still their time spent doing these tasks that produce the art, though it may seem menial. Why shouldn't they value their time if there's a demand for what they produce with the software? No one is stopping anyone from going and generating their own personal AI porn.The problem is, it isn't really right to use it and paywall it as an artist. All they do is type in key words and hit "start" and the AI spits it out. People who do pay for the work, should expect the artist to do the actual work, not a machine copying different styles.
You missed the point but ran headfirst into it at the same timeBut it is still their time spent doing these tasks that produce the art, though it may seem menial. Why shouldn't they value their time if there's a demand for what they produce with the software? No one is stopping anyone from going and generating their own personal AI porn.
Ehh, maybe. I'm here sharing stolen goods, I try not to point the finger too much.You missed the point but ran headfirst into it at the same time
There is no value to the product if it all being mass produce by a machine.But it is still their time spent doing these tasks that produce the art, though it may seem menial. Why shouldn't they value their time if there's a demand for what they produce with the software?
That one of the main issues with AI. Anyone can just plagiarize anyone work and just claim to be an artist now.No one is stopping anyone from going and generating their own personal AI porn.
We live in a time were people can claim there alot of dumb things they can not be but thats hwo its isThere is no value to the product if it all being mass produce by a machine.
That one of the main issues with AI. Anyone can just plagiarize anyone work and just claim to be an artist now.