- Oct 18, 2019
- 3,435
- 7,196
As for "slave", I mean slavery specifically, not BDSM role-playing games with rules and stop words. So in this case, no one will ask Juliette if she agrees or not. She will simply become a slave and be forced to do what she is told. And the fact that Juliette, as a dominant and sadistic woman would be pissed off about this new and pathetic role of hers would be doubly satisfying for me, because she definitely deserves it. But there's one problem. Tess herself probably wouldn't agree to this kind of endings. Female solidarity, femdom and all that..Yeah, if I'm being serious, there's no real way for us to "correct" Jules' behaviour. She is a dominant and a sadist, she will never accept a subservient role (even in a normal relationship, let alone a "slave"). She will rather die, of that I'm certain. So, yeah, either she wins the Gambit, or she feeds the fishes. Such a shame, she has a great body.
And in general, it seems that no "slave" endings with the any sisters are planned, and the so-called "harem" endings (two LI+Kane) mentioned and listed by Tess simply involve a polygamous relationship in which one of these notional LIs will be slightly more powerful than the other Kane's girlfriend and that's it. No personal slaves, nothing like that. Alas.