- Apr 2, 2022
- 166
- 860
Since you responded fast you wouldn’t also happen to have the one where she is laying down too? View attachment 1963253
oh hey, the audio for that one was one of my commissions
Yes. Why audio designers re-reencode instead of remux their audio is beyond me. I really hate how some people tamper with the original video, either re-rendering it with obsurd bitrates, or people uploading to shit sites like rule34.xxx which obliterate the original quality of the files. That's why I created an archive for this stuff so that all audio is properly remuxed to the original videos.I don't get why some videos with audio have the double of size of the original's, while keeping the original frame sizes. The original videos already have a high bitrate for 1080p.
Here is the new doa pack with audio.
Workupload
It's done because most of them have tiers of access, so they need to offer something beyond the original. Sometimes it's watermark free, sometimes it's AI upscales, sometimes it's higher bitrate. They do it to justify their middle-tier patreon options normally.I don't get why some videos with audio have the double of size of the original's, while keeping the original frame sizes. The original videos already have a high bitrate for 1080p.
Here is the new doa pack with audio.
Workupload
So because of greed it not enough to just add their own audio/remix the audio. But they have to tamper with the original quality of the video to justify having high tiers on their Patreon pages.It's done because most of them have tiers of access, so they need to offer something beyond the original. Sometimes it's watermark free, sometimes it's AI upscales, sometimes it's higher bitrate. They do it to justify their middle-tier patreon options normally.
Was there a .blend file of this scene?Since you responded fast you wouldn’t also happen to have the one where she is laying down too? View attachment 1963253
I'm using a simple code in FFmpeg:The watermark they add can be a valid reason indeed, or an upscale (which is honestly useless in most cases if you really know what an upscale does).
A higher bitrate offers absolutely nothing beyond excess file size, you can never really improve upon an original video with such a take, increasing the bitrate is just plain laughable. It simply doesn't work like that.
If I had to guess the main reason, it would be mostly lack of video editing knowledge basics. Using default application settings for bitrate editing etc.
PS1: added 2 new ones on the latest link from adude btw. Honoka.
PS2: Seems like you are losing some audio quality on those renatobustillos (check audio bitrates).
Ok I try but no promises.I'm using a simple code in FFmpeg:
ffmpeg -i "input.mp4" -i "audio.mp4" -map 0:v -map 1:a -c:v copy -shortest "output.mp4"
From what I heard it shouldn't reduce the quality. So tell me if you know how to improve it.
This is fine in most cases. Just keep in mind, if the audio length is shorter than the video, there may be frames lost in the video. The '-shortest' line determines which of the tracks is the shortest, and remuxes to that length. So, if the audio is shorter by a significant amount, there will be frames lost in the video.I'm using a simple code in FFmpeg:
ffmpeg -i "input.mp4" -i "audio.mp4" -map 0:v -map 1:a -c:v copy -shortest "output.mp4"
From what I heard it shouldn't reduce the quality. So tell me if you know how to improve it.
Luna and Tsukushi are the best ones for meGuy is insane he just released 2nd part:
You must be registered to see the links
Good luck to audio editors they will never keep up with his speed lol.
Eh, waste of time in my opinion. He already made Tsukushi one, so why make another bunch? It doesn't have Tsukushi in it, so it's just worse.
What i mean to say is that he could instead recoordinate his efforts into making 10 Tsukushi vids. Everyone would happier that way.
I got this one.Hello guys does anyone have a link for the videos with young luna with sound please?