But they released a "beta" and asked for feedback though. Overly harsh criticism may not help in some aspect, but anything game related has something to improve the game with potentially.
- Jan 29, 2019
- 2,849
- 3,989
Not sure what you try to argue here. I never said a thing about "don't critic the dev".
I agree, "Constructive" Criticism will always help, No matter if it's "harsh" or not (might just be the way people talk).
The other user lamenting the dev for not sticking to RPGM, and demanded the dev to "fix battles ASAP even if it's in beta". That's not even a Critique.
I just obversed and wanted to add my perspective.
But the site for Accea went down. The dev can do whatever they want but not communicating about anything is not the best choice either IMO.
- Jan 29, 2019
- 2,849
- 3,989
The game is obviously in a very early and rough state.
There's times and space of being Public / Transparent, some are counter-productive.
Why open to public who don't know shit about game development, when the game is not ready?
You can already see people being unnecessarily impatient / toxic.
Tho your criticism about the difficulty of using Godot is legit.
Wish the dev is not biting more than they could chew, "have higher celling" doesn't necessarily mean you can to reach it.
There're 3 possible outcome,
The devs is too ambitious for their own good, abandon the whole thing all together;
The game turns out OK but not better than the RPGM counterparts;
The dev is really talented, improving their skills a lot and make a much better game.
I wish it's the 3rd case.
I mean ain't that the point of the Beta? Let players find problems then try to fix them?
Last edited: