I mean, they didn't exactly say the 'happy' scenes were a problem, though a few scenes are implied because of the underage pixels involved. He isn't actually obligated to remove any that don't fit within that implication...yet. It was more a what if than a worry as nothing has been stated about the 'happy' scenes directly.You guys are worrying to much, the happy scenes will be present in the 18+ version while they're cut for the SFW version.
Selebus is just lucky there's no rule against handing over the offending version of a game to a completely unrelated developer for continuation.
The huggy boy?...oh, this is going to be gold.Selebus posted this in the announcements channel of the Discord:
![]()
Under the implication in the story, that is correct that it was the sister in law, not Sensei. I wouldn't put it past Patreon to take issue with it as if he was the aggressor, though, in an alternate situation where they actually got the chance to look at more aspects of the original before it got handed over to Subeles so Selebus didn't get in trouble.Actually, recently I've come to believe that the aggressor was the sister in law, and that she may have been Sensei's teacher at the time.