- May 25, 2022
- 697
- 879
Narrative Determinism?You don't think it's a little...odd...that all of the women we meet, under all of their specific trauma, are horny little freaks?
Narrative Determinism?You don't think it's a little...odd...that all of the women we meet, under all of their specific trauma, are horny little freaks?
Niki as wellTechnically he had consensual sex with the Haruka, Maki and Sara... actually I thought there would be more, I guess we can now add Imani to the list too.
I mean yea, in a "Porn Game" there is a convoluted reason why you get to sleep with everybody. It's the genre.Narrative Determinism?
Would Niki have still slept with us, if we weren't lying about fucking a bunch of underage girls? Including her sister?Niki as well
She would (probably) not have consented if she knew all the facts, therefore she did not consent? That's a hell of a reach. I thought you were going to say none of the sex was consensual because Akira wasn't fully in control or something, that would have been better than this.Would Niki have still slept with us, if we weren't lying about fucking a bunch of underage girls? Including her sister?
Because if the answer is "no" we have manipulated her.
Again, we have a character state outright that we have never seen a consensual sex act in this game.
However that is before we fuck (best girl) Nodoka. So that may be the first one.
I hate to be the one to break it to you, but if you lie up and down to a woman to sleep with them, you have committed a "rape."She would (probably) not have consented if she knew all the facts, therefore she did not consent? That's a hell of a reach. I thought you were going to say none of the sex was consensual because Akira wasn't fully in control or something, that would have been better than this.
Edit: Wow, this became a very big post - so, basically, I go into Akira's side of things for stomachache. There is no point to be made here, it is merely a look at his side of things for what happened.I know this isn't really all that impressive, but I totally called it. Felt sick to my stomach but I think that Sel did a good job with that.
I think that along with what people have already said about how Akira just handles things the only way he knows how (with his massive penis), Akira is just doing something absolutely wrong and we know it. We're being forced along for the ride on his descent into the dark path. The shit he's doing right now isn't supposed to redeem him, but further condemn him. At least, that's how I'm viewing it.
I do think this is how we'll get back to talking to Io eventually. They'll talk at the Halloween party, it will probably get worse, then the reset will happen and Io won't understand why Akira refuses to talk to her, or is extremely uncomfortable when he does (unless the dark route goes into full swing here and she has full memory of it)
Did she get set on fire? I thought she got her burns from boiling water. But yeah, wow, her brother watched that too? Like wtaf.
I really agree with the analysis of the Io scene. It viscerally disgusted me to watch but it was very interesting to see how the two characters approached the same problem in the absolute worst way.
That seems to be a misguided interpretation of the definition. By what you're saying, if someone has a girlfriend and has sex with another person, and that second person didn't know they had a girlfriend, it was rape. This makes no sense.I hate to be the one to break it to you, but if you lie up and down to a woman to sleep with them, you have committed a "rape."
You must be registered to see the links.
And while I think Niki is very down bad, I think she would not have fucked us if she new we were fucking Ami. But if you went "good uncle," her sister grinding on top of us topless would probably have done it.
While my other argument is weaker, and I think there is very much a difference between selling the best version of yourself (wooing) and declining to tell somebody that you're molesting her sister, I'm going to drop that line cuz it's the least interesting.As to everyone being supernaturally forced to want to have sex with Akira, well, that's possible. But if that's the case then there's really no point in talking about consent in the first place. What would it even matter if Akira manipulated Haruka and to which extent if there's a supernatural entity that robs her of her ability to choose not to have sex with him?
Just to make it clear that I didn't download this game for that reason, I already had basic knowledge about what this game was and the main reason I keep playing it is to see the end of the story from Akira,Maya, Yumi and now Io. At no point in this game after the first day did I see it as a porn game.I don't really know how else to read this game but a study in this mentality. We all downloaded this because we wanted to masturbate. Our introduction is our nieces vagina cutting us. We all choose to stay even though character after character tells us they feel like they are trapped.
Next update looks greatYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Well, that's a very valid perspective. But certainly one can read it in a multitude of ways. The game does tell you to stop, but that same game has people telling you that trials are necessary for one to deserve heaven. Himawari tells you that things have to happen in a certain order, and that she'll try to minimize your suffering, but it is necessary to some extent. Also, who is telling you to stop? And why? Cause in that same game there are many that tell you to actively ignore these messages.While my other argument is weaker, and I think there is very much a difference between selling the best version of yourself (wooing) and declining to tell somebody that you're molesting her sister.
But the above is the meat of what I think the game is getting at. Because, there very much is still consent to talk about in the above case. I'm leaving for a trip soon, so I don't have the time to do it right now, but how many times so far as the game tried to get you to stop playing? It tries to shame you to stop. It wonders why you won't stop. It begs you stop. It condemns you for not stopping. It warns you that we aren't close to hitting rock bottom of degradation yet.
That's not even mentioning all the "Ending" screens we get. Little off ramps for the player.
Maybe it's because I come from a performance background, but I think we often times overly use literary crit to talk about games but theater crit is just as applicable, if you consider "the player" as "the actor." In theater crit there is an idea of audience culpability. That the catharsis of the tragedy comes from the audiences participation in the acts committed on stage.
And that participation comes from their silence. They are free to interrupt and condemn the performance at any time.
I don't really know how else to read this game but a study in this mentality. We all downloaded this because we wanted to masturbate. Our introduction is our nieces vagina cutting us. We all choose to stay even though character after character tells us they feel like they are trapped.
That's what I think that line about "never having had consensual sex" is about.
same.Just to make it clear that I didn't download this game for that reason, I already had basic knowledge about what this game was and the main reason I keep playing it is to see the end of the story from Akira,Maya, Yumi and now Io. At no point in this game after the first day did I see it as a porn game.
For the same reason nobody stops a play. It's a ritual. Everybody knows what's going to happen before they go in. If you think I'm negating that the trials are necessary, your 100% wrong. I believe the opposite, I believe there will be a catharsis. And that Sel's promises of deep long happy endings for each of the characters is real. But for you to get it, you have to join in. You have to participate in the act. You don't get to sit on the sidelines and justify the horror you partook in. You gotta understand the horror, and that you were willing to partake, so when you leave the theater, you know never to do it IRL as that is not a "safe" space for such moral experimentation.Well, that's a very valid perspective. But certainly one can read it in a multitude of ways. The game does tell you to stop, but that same game has people telling you that trials are necessary for one to deserve heaven. Himawari tells you that things have to happen in a certain order, and that she'll try to minimize your suffering, but it is necessary to some extent. Also, who is telling you to stop? And why? Cause in that same game there are many that tell you to actively ignore these messages.
No it stops. It ends. At least if I'm using my theater crit lens. Because "The Theater" or "The Game" is only existent in the act of playing. It's a ritual, and the instructions for the ritual are not the ritual, only The Ritual is the ritual. That's on our side of things. Based on game lore, and here I know you're more versed then me, I think it either just goes back to the endless loops that Maya Prime told us about. But I like to think that Akira gets to sleep.By that same token, what's the alternative? Does the game stop if the players turns it off? Or are you simply choosing not to see where it goes? Does another user take control? Are you not what little remains of Akira's will and without you he'd go back to being a puppet?
Again, I think you misunderstood that it's all a Ritual. Selebus won't stop asking for money, because we're paying him for the experience. The game literally does not hide what it is from the top and what it's going to make us do. This isn't going to be the fun College Daze fucking your family. It's not going to sarcastically ask why you're fucking your family as something hot happens. It's going to really ask you that while bodies become grotesque as you are fucking them. It's only a trap and a trick if we didn't get our catharsis at the end.If a game was something else I think it would be much rather be a book than theater. Your audience can indeed do whatever they want, and are only bound by what's expected of them as an audience. But a reader can only stop reading the story - as the gamer can only stop playing the game. The day Selebus harasses the people that pay him with "stop giving me money, you're responsible for this tragedy", then I'll probably agree with the culpability of his audience to such an extent.
I think I've covered most of this paragraph above. But there is one final point I think is really important to understanding this game: "How is one culpable for wanting to see what the author has written?"As it is, the culpability of "stop playing the game" is confetti. Obviously Selebus doesn't want you to stop playing. The story will go on with or without you, this is a hollow provocation. You're not responsible for any of this because this is not an rpg, no one here is Akira because there isn't enough leeway for him to differ that much from what choices there are. There is only one true path in LiL, and the few choices you can make are "I choose to miss events". Well, is someone better than the other for shielding their eyes with their hands during a play? How is one culpable for wanting to see what the author has written?
I recognize your vision as valid, but there are others imo.
I don't think you need to question your morals. Deep down you know it's fiction and the truth is Rin is just more likable than Io so betraying her feels worse.What makes me question my moral is that destroying Io felt like calmly driving off the cliff on purpose in slow motion, while Rin holding her nude right next to her face and confronting you honestly had me worried that I’ve fucked up big time.
I can stare right back at Io’s lifeless glare, but I really can’t quite do the same with Rin’s lightest disappointment, knowing that in the latter case I am 1000% fully guilty of ruining any chance I could have with her if things went sideways.
Also more likely. I'm definitely not saying that one couldn't find themselves in a situation similar to stomachache, but the nude trade is much more relatable (?), I guess. Plus, Io's situation is you, the player, feeling wrong about letting something happen. Io herself is "fine" with it and reassures Akira many times over. Rin's situation has Rin blaming Akira. Io doesn't put herself in the situation as a victim, Rin does.I don't think you need to question your morals. Deep down you know it's fiction and the truth is Rin is just more likable than Io so betraying her feels worse.
This is it. I feel the opposite of how that guy feels because I like Io. I think I could handle similar levels of fucked up shit happening to any girl in the game besides Io.Rin is just more likable than Io
I don't know why, but the act of Io trying to calm Akira down made me feel really distressed, I could see that none of them were enjoying it, the only event that made me feel this agony was the "Maya's death" event. Which IN MY OPINION is still the event that caused me the most anguish.Also more likely. I'm definitely not saying that one couldn't find themselves in a situation similar to stomachache, but the nude trade is much more relatable (?), I guess. Plus, Io's situation is you, the player, feeling wrong about letting something happen. Io herself is "fine" with it and reassures Akira many times over. Rin's situation has Rin blaming Akira. Io doesn't put herself in the situation as a victim, Rin does.
Totally normal response given that.