- Oct 14, 2024
- 1
- 4
Here my tierlist
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,606
- 9,541
There's been a sudden influx of newbies, where are all you guys coming from? What lead you to this game/thread?
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,683
- 7,776
I heard this was a game about cute harem girls doing cute harem things.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Also, arguably, this could be Himawari's inception moment (sex during christmas' eve, after the second reset):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I was routinely searching through games here and wound up way beyond my depth. Also why is the game itself being mean to Sana please tell the game to stop
- Sep 29, 2019
- 2,556
- 8,472
Noriko actually showed up in Chapter 1's Haruka Event:
You must be registered to see the links
Potentially still looking for Sensei who was right behind her...
As screwed up? Probably not. The Resets seem to affect everyone, whether they realize it or not. Haunting their dreams and their minds at times. With some managing to acknowledge this, but being forced to pretend everything's normal to keep their sanity. Like how some girls have seen strange/traumatic things lately and basically just go on with their days afterwards.Nope. Ergo bottom tier for me.
Serious question: would the two of them--or even Sekai--be as screwed up in the head without the resets?
Ami:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Nodoka:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Both girls were basically forced into an unhealthy Caretaker role when they should have been the ones being taken care of. It's likely fucked their mentality.
The supernatural aspects also likely have affected both girls their whole lives. With their families already being involved in whatever is going on.
Then the Resets more or less intensified their problems millions fold, while virtually stealing any chance they could have to grow from them.
Of course, whether any of these characters and their backstories actually existed before the Resets, isn't entirely clear.
----
As for Sekai:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
This supernatural stuff seems to go back at least 200 years, based off Yasu's religion being that old from a 2020 (Year of The Resets) perspective. It definitely goes back to when Sekai's and Sensei's parents were teens. In other words: We're at least on Generation 3 (Ami's Gen) of this story. (Himawari might be from Gen 4?)
Last edited:
- Aug 24, 2019
- 247
- 448
Technically I first came here during 0.2.0 release, just didn't talk much.
Back when you could turn Ayane down.
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,683
- 7,776
Yes, but she wasn't introduced.
You can see Io in the same manner when Ami takes Akira to the mall, and says she's going to look for a job. Most of them appear in that way, however, until the end of chapter 1, all main characters are introduced to Akira with the exception of Noriko.
Io talks to him directly when he goes to the baths with Ayane, and Yasu does the same (two times over) but more importantly when she talks to Sana about her brother. Noriko is the only one that never engages Akira directly until the end of season 1 (understandably so, as that's the point of her later introduction scene).
Edit: unrelated to the point but I've uploaded a few more signatures (under the general category), from screenshots I took from season 1. I have yet to make the character signatures with the screenshots I took because I'm lazy and I have to input their names and that takes a little more time.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- Aug 20, 2022
- 188
- 1,077
Noticed this during my replay.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,606
- 9,541
I do find it somewhat silly that you and everyone in your camp plus everyone who falls into Mooney's camp can ever claim or at least assume any degree of likelihood to either possibility. What Mooney showed was there is an explanation that can fit that suggests Ami has been aware all along, but it's all unprovable, no evidence definitively pointing one way or the other currently exists, the two theories rely on interpretations of the same evidence... so i ain't taking a stance, either works, both fit, no way to know which is right so it just feels foolish to me for anyone to even lean a certain way, reeks of bias and cherry picking to fit a preconceived and preferred outcome...
This is something i see quite often in this thread, lost in the joy of theorycrafting i feel too many people lose the forest for the trees... this isn't a personal attack or anything, you just happened to be the latest person to rub that particular gripe of mine and forced me to throw out my usual 'hey guys, take a step back from this stuff for a second and remember the big picture' reminder.
- Feb 28, 2018
- 598
- 841
Yeah. That was one of the bits that made me think about the question of how much reset knowledge if any Ami has at that point. If she were trying to get Akira worked up, you'd think she'd have teased him with this possibility, knowing how he'd respond.
Yeah. I get what you're saying. The tunnel vision is one of the problems with theorizing about a work in progress: confirmation bias is almost impossible to avoid. But hey! Theorizing is fun, and, LiL almost demands it, and at this point we can't be sure where the game is headed. So damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead!
(As long as we all remember that these theories are hypotheses, not yet established textual fact.)
Last edited:
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,683
- 7,776
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,606
- 9,541
That's not what i'm saying, theorycraft away, i enjoy reading them, it's a small point of order if nothing else, it's the jump from an interpretation to actually taking a stance that i feel is unwarranted, i really enjoyed reading your Ami theory as you were building it, but at no point did i see any reason to start thinking you were anymore right than the counter position, both fit, if Ami pretends not to have a clue or Ami doesn't have a clue both look the same then yes, either could be true. I try to be a voice of reason in moments where i feel the tone of conversation starts to pull beyond wants known and starts to get into moving on like a position has to be taken, there shouldn't be 'camps' for the new Ami information, when you and Fdsa first got into it it already felt like things were a bit too stubborn for unproven hypotheses. Again, none of that was an attack, just a call to check things aren't getting lost between where things are and where the theorycrafting has taken things.
- Aug 20, 2022
- 188
- 1,077
I'm sorry if my post came off as confrontational or claiming any sort of rightfulness to this theory. I think this was just bad wording from my part.
I don't intend to position anyone here into 'camps' or say anyone is wrong for believing in a certain theory (other than when I am joking of course). And I also don't think anyone else is.
Moonflare already put it very well and I agree with how she sees it. Theory crafting in itself is something that cannot be fully based on facts, it's always gonna be the subjective interpretation of certain situations.
So even if I say things like "I'm willing to die on this hill" or that I present some counter arguments for certain theories, please don't take it too seriously, or even personally.
As a matter of fact, I am probably very wrong most of the time, so take whatever I say with a pinch of salt and treat it just as a little window into my smooth brain and how I see things - not as a mantra that one is to follow or that has any kind of merit to it just because I say so.
I will try to mention it more explicitly in the future when something I say is a theory rather than making it sound like something is supposed to be proof or a fact.
Anyway, I blame the lack of new updates, Sel bring us new things to talk about!
I don't intend to position anyone here into 'camps' or say anyone is wrong for believing in a certain theory (other than when I am joking of course). And I also don't think anyone else is.
Moonflare already put it very well and I agree with how she sees it. Theory crafting in itself is something that cannot be fully based on facts, it's always gonna be the subjective interpretation of certain situations.
So even if I say things like "I'm willing to die on this hill" or that I present some counter arguments for certain theories, please don't take it too seriously, or even personally.
As a matter of fact, I am probably very wrong most of the time, so take whatever I say with a pinch of salt and treat it just as a little window into my smooth brain and how I see things - not as a mantra that one is to follow or that has any kind of merit to it just because I say so.
I will try to mention it more explicitly in the future when something I say is a theory rather than making it sound like something is supposed to be proof or a fact.
Anyway, I blame the lack of new updates, Sel bring us new things to talk about!
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,683
- 7,776
I wasn't troubled at all nor did I assume the same as Bingoogus/or even agree. However, I do think that, between the regulars, it's a good policy to always assume the best out of what people are talking about since miscommunication is a thing, and so is the inferred common interest in keeping the thread a good place for everyone involved. Basically, I tend to assume it all comes from a good place, and advise that others do the same.I'm sorry if my post came off as confrontational or claiming any sort of rightfulness to this theory. I think this was just bad wording from my part.
I don't intend to position anyone here into 'camps' or say anyone is wrong for believing in a certain theory (other than when I am joking of course). And I also don't think anyone else is.
Moonflare already put it very well and I agree with how she sees it. Theory crafting in itself is something that cannot be fully based on facts, it's always gonna be the subjective interpretation of certain situations.
So even if I say things like "I'm willing to die on this hill" or that I present some counter arguments for certain theories, please don't take it too seriously, or even personally.
As a matter of fact, I am probably very wrong most of the time, so take whatever I say with a pinch of salt and treat it just as a little window into my smooth brain and how I see things - not as a mantra that one is to follow or that has any kind of merit to it just because I say so.
I will try to mention it more explicitly in the future when something I say is a theory rather than making it sound like something is supposed to be proof or a fact.
Anyway, I blame the lack of new updates, Sel bring us new things to talk about!
On a different topic, especially for those also replaying, have you guys noticed some disconnect between how characters acted and in how they acted later? Io's being introduced right not and one of her conversations went like "just remembered your penis heh"
And I'm like, who are you? Is this Maki shapeshifting?I'm curious about Yasu, because if I recall I had once noticed that she acted a bit different in the beginning, so I'm looking forward to that. Maybe it just boils down to Selebus getting the hang with how they talk with time idk.
I'm sorry because i won't be able to share any screenshots that related the events i will talk about.
At the start of the chapter 2, Ayane kisses Ami because of spin the bottle game and sensei remarks how they done it before and he catched them doing it. Ami refuses that ever happening.
So either Ayane or Ami lied about kissing, or Ami doesn't remember it. Which is weird. At the end of chapter 1 reset, Ami was on top of sensei similar to "breed your niece minigame" but she was contantly saying help me or something similar like she knew she was going to die.
Does resets affect Ami differently than other characters? Like she gets changes everytime she fails to create perfect world or something?
At the start of the chapter 2, Ayane kisses Ami because of spin the bottle game and sensei remarks how they done it before and he catched them doing it. Ami refuses that ever happening.
So either Ayane or Ami lied about kissing, or Ami doesn't remember it. Which is weird. At the end of chapter 1 reset, Ami was on top of sensei similar to "breed your niece minigame" but she was contantly saying help me or something similar like she knew she was going to die.
Does resets affect Ami differently than other characters? Like she gets changes everytime she fails to create perfect world or something?
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,683
- 7,776
iirc Ayane later confirms that she lied about the kiss (that was to check if Akira really didn't have his memories or something, and that she was worried how she might look like to an Akira that had a teenager he couldn't remember being with suddenly throwing herself at him). But I can't recall the event.
This also checks out with an event in chapter 1, where Akira asks himself if the original Akira had any feelings towards Ayane and the screen changes to her face being a sunflower and the narration answering: NONE.
As for the Ami stuff, that's being discussed.
- Aug 24, 2019
- 247
- 448
Yeah I think it shows that while Selebus had their general characters on paper he definitely took a bit to nail them down fully.I wasn't troubled at all nor did I assume the same as Bingoogus/or even agree. However, I do think that, between the regulars, it's a good policy to always assume the best out of what people are talking about since miscommunication is a thing, and so is the inferred common interest in keeping the thread a good place for everyone involved. Basically, I tend to assume it all comes from a good place, and advise that others do the same.
On a different topic, especially for those also replaying, have you guys noticed some disconnect between how characters acted and in how they acted later? Io's being introduced right not and one of her conversations went like "just remembered your penis heh"
I'm curious about Yasu, because if I recall I had once noticed that she acted a bit different in the beginning, so I'm looking forward to that. Maybe it just boils down to Selebus getting the hang with how they talk with time idk.
So many of their attitudes feel absolutely concrete in the latest version, as though you can tell what they're gonna say, but then replaying it there's a few times where I was like "huh".
Then again they do get a lot of intentional changes over time, such as Miku being open about sex talks.
Ami going from a loveable and out of her way nice girl is HUGE, but I think the biggest difference is Ayane, she's way more immature and clingy and while those do become either story related or relevant to a point, she's kind of crazy at the start, which gets snubbed out over time outside of story developments (IMO).
A good few of the class started off as blatant tropes but segway a bit over time.