- May 1, 2020
- 54
- 269
Excellent points, thanks for the response. So my proposed timeline doesn't work with what we've heard from Noriko about the tutoring years (or the past renders of her and Maya).The Tutoring timeline probably looks more like this:
Although, Nodoka may have confirmed, last update, a theory of mine that I've had for a while, which would make the Timeline canonically retroactively artificial. (Basically if someone mentions a reference of time, something writes it in. Makes it "real".)
- Sensei starts tutoring, and starts tutoring Noriko when she's 6 (it's probably around 2010, Sensei is around 21 to 22)
- Accident happens around 2011 to 2012, Sensei ghosts Niki and takes a break from tutoring.
- It's around 2012, Sensei starts tutoring again, and tutors Maya and Noriko who are around 7 to 8, and Sensei is around 22 to 23.
- Around 2015, Sensei has Noriko and Maya read '1984', when they are around 10.
- Around 2016, Sensei abandons Noriko, with Maya. They are probably around 11 to 12. (Ayane probably shows up around this time thanks to Ami, and breaks down in front of Sensei, over her mother)
- In 2020, Sensei and Maya reunites with Noriko. Noriko is 16, Maya 15, Sensei 31, and Niki 29.
There's also how Long Maya implied something was secretly cutting up the pieces of the puzzle with scissors, in the 'Second Sun' Happy Event. In other words: messing with the established timeline after the fact.
It seems like the timeline is mostly coherent from the accident onward? That would mean that the largest apparent inconsistency here is repeated depictions of Noriko being far older than she should be at various points in Akira and Niki's history.
Keeping in mind that my suggestion is an exercise meant to select a single element we can change to make the timeline optimally coherent based on what we know, I think it can be adapted to this reality:
--> Noriko was born around 2001, stopped aging around age 6, and started aging again when Sensei began tutoring her.
This supposition gives her reasonable ages for the events of the tour, the first kiss, and Kyoto. I think we still have to either split Kyoto, or assume that Akira and Niki were having overt sexual interactions for years before deciding to 'get together'. So far I feel the former fits better.
Interesting interpretation of Nodoka's words. I see what you mean by 'retroactively artificial', and I wouldn't find it shocking. On the other hand, what would be the point of the slow drip of timeline revelations if any assertion may be inserted into a twisted timeline?
On that final note about Long Maya: I think that's the best description of what we're actually seeing with events like Kyoto. The pieces have been mixed, warped, and obscured; but eventually a coherent image will emerge.