Moonflare
Engaged Member
- Aug 23, 2023
- 2,049
- 10,785
It would make a lot of sense for Ami to not be real, or rather her being there is very convenient to the forces that would be able to put a fake in her place. Because, really, she's what keeps Akira from killing himself. She's the first one he sees when the cycle starts, she's the one that "goes insane", she's the one that shows up during all sorts of happy events, she's the avatar of the xeonon, she's the substitute of the flower that Akira sought refuge in, she's her mother's stand-in, she's the oh so perfect little girl... At some point, we should probably start a tierlist on the likelyhood of characters not being real, cause this is getting interesting.Well, maybe Ami was never in the picture. Maybe it's her in Sekai's belly, and maybe she died with her. Maybe this Ami was just "made" by sensei. I mean, I was thinking something along those lines since tutoring thing. Since Ami is the same age as Noriko and Maya, why not tutor them all together? Ami would make new friends, class would be 50% bigger too.
Or it's just 2nd child, but, as said before, Sekai leaving Ami behind is doubtful. And if Ami was in the picture, she would've been mentioned as well. But nope.
I can see your reasoning now. Man, what a mess Selebus has made this time lolhmm yea that is quite alarming. If I were to defend it, I can push Spotless Mind a liiiiiittle earlier than 2007, banking on this "way later" not exceeding a year. If it's like you said, that "way later" means several years, it would violate a lot more things that aren't even the target of this timeline construction, as Akira and Niki had to start dating at 2007 to satisfy "they dated five years" and "Sekai died 8 years ago when Ami was 7" (additional ref here is Heaven for Human Blood)
Yup, these are the parts that I feel strange too. But let's see here.......
1. I regard your Point 1 as the logical conjecture and thus is not put into consideration when constructing the timeline. For me the tug of war is between "Cannot find a plausible reasoning behind wha/why Sekai's proposing" and "Noriko should not have existed at that given time"; AKA, a plot stretch vs a plot mistake. The former still has a chance to be explained in the future no matter how unconvincing it might be, while the latter is simply a mistake and has no chance to explain itself without invoking things like "Selly fucked up" or "Noriko can violate causality", and these are much bigger and more irreversible assumptions.
2. Were they not dating already in Kyoto? Is it because they still referred to each other as friend or childhood friend when a third person was around, or did they say something specific about it? (let me doubt check...)
Regardless, the paths forward are something like these:
- Accept Kyoto in 2005 / Tolerate Noriko being -1 year old / Plothole identified
- Accept Kyoto in 2011 / Tolerate not being able to comprehend why Sekai would suggest that
- Does not believe Kyoto exist within the same linear timeline
Despite everything in Kyoto really really feeling like 2005 (I must admit, the emotional weight feels more fitting if it was her carrying Ami and if Akira was still 16), I still subjectively picked the second one because the alternatives either violate causality or are not bound by it. But if a second piece emerges in the future that also violates causality in a similar manner then I am jumping ship.
That is my reasoning, yes. For a second pregnancy to be true, this is a assumption I have to make since neither Ami or ghost Sekai has ever mentioned about it.
Edit: Addressing both you and aramaug regarding Niki and Akira not dating during Kyoto. It's not just the friend x boyfriend thing. It's present in the whole event (there is a tension regarding their relationship not being defined - this extends even to her mother not knowing how to address Sekai). Niki is uncertain how they should part (kiss or hug), she reminds him of how long they've known eachother (as if she's hinting at something), It's Akira that doesn't want to have sex (again holding back against Niki's insistence about advancing their relationship), Akira is also uncertain how to explain his relationship with Niki to Sekai (whereas in the future Sekai refers to them as boyfriend x girlfriend), and if all of that wasn't enough, Kyoto serves as a defining reason for Akira to make Niki his girlfriend. It's right there when he chooses to stay, that's when the "not defined" relationship that was displayed throughout the event becomes defined, he wants to be her boyfriend, and likely becomes so right after it.
Last edited: