Martogor
New Member
- Apr 22, 2020
- 14
- 32
Yeah i realized laterDamn, that's one well-developed ten-year-old. Rin was born in February 2006, less than six months after Ami, so Sekai can't be her mother. Also we're told that her bio mom was unmarried and way too young to have a baby.
but i already was thinking on other imposibilities of this so yeah
GSwole
Member
- May 1, 2023
- 123
- 347
Because it keeps you losers in line and 2nd guessing anything I tell you
Ooga booga
Meskal1ne
Newbie
- Oct 7, 2023
- 42
- 90
That's not true. You want to say that girl same size as Miku, didn't notice Akira penetration? With so much power that we see in Tsuneo event? Nonsence.
Bingoogus
Engaged Member
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,993
- 11,446
Yeah, i don't care how drunk you are, you're waking up if someone rips your genitals up.
LoveRedHairedGirl
Active Member
- Dec 18, 2020
- 863
- 2,735
JelF547
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2023
- 1,059
- 2,093
Well, Molly died, then reseted, then died again, then reseted again etc etc until Akira finally contained himself. This is my interpretation of that event
All vaginas are built different. Sensation is perceived differently as well. Some girls of the same size can take a lot and others have trouble with even small dicks/objects. As much as I dislike that scene, I interpreted it as a repressed memory that was being drawn out rather than something fabricated.
Last edited:
Bingoogus
Engaged Member
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,993
- 11,446
Repressed by who? Tsuneyo? So you think she stood there, watched him rape her, pulled out and finished on her, then flew in with sword drawn? Akira? He's militantly anti-having-kids, has he ever fucked someone with the intention of getting them pregananant?
why has nobody considered that the resets started happening before this game's starting point
Bingoogus
Engaged Member
- Sep 5, 2021
- 3,993
- 11,446
Possible, but falls too far out into the realm of infinite speculation. We need some kind of indicator to give it some legs before we can try and get it to walk.
Psygore
New Member
- Jun 14, 2018
- 6
- 11
Longtime reader first time poster and all that, but: hi
I think the proposed 2005-2020 timeline for Sekai and the Nakayamas would work if we assume, as it's already been posited in multiple occurrences, that Ami might not be 100% real and, in fact, somewhat fictional/fabricated, not unlike the G̶O̶D̶S̶ gods, but based on a human that existed/was about to exist.
If we accept Pareidolia's words as an actual honest and truthful explanation of what a god is (or at least how they come into existence, with Akira pulling aspects out of a wishing well of forgotten deities) and take into account how frequent 'reality rewrites' seem to be within the Kumon-mi bubble, I believe it isn't so far fetched to suggest that:
I think the proposed 2005-2020 timeline for Sekai and the Nakayamas would work if we assume, as it's already been posited in multiple occurrences, that Ami might not be 100% real and, in fact, somewhat fictional/fabricated, not unlike the G̶O̶D̶S̶ gods, but based on a human that existed/was about to exist.
If we accept Pareidolia's words as an actual honest and truthful explanation of what a god is (or at least how they come into existence, with Akira pulling aspects out of a wishing well of forgotten deities) and take into account how frequent 'reality rewrites' seem to be within the Kumon-mi bubble, I believe it isn't so far fetched to suggest that:
- Sekai in 2011 ('Kyoto' event) is pregnant with Ami (Akira's child)
- Akira refuses to flee with her
- Sekai dies shortly thereafter (2012) in the car crash
- Ami is created by either one of the gods or Akira himself as a manifestation/result (or taking advantage) of his feelings of guilt: "if only i had left with Sekai and accepted to be a father to her baby, she'd still be alive". Akira makes himself be the caretaker of the baby he rejected and Ami gets retconned into existence, but as being born at a point in time (2005) where it would make sense for her to be the right age to be his niece/student in the present. Also, convienient tool to keep Akira in Kumon-mi and alive: he has to take care of Ami. But if she was still in the womb during the car crash, he couldn't possibly assume that mantle, so she "was already there" and was left orphaned by the car crash.
Akira never mustered the strenght to shake himself out of depression stasis to go get her out of an orphanage, instead while in his episode/stasis he willed her into existence and deluded himself in having gone retrieve her. - Maya 'the stray with no past' gets created (or drawn from the well) to be his perfect distraction/coping mechanism and an outlet for the predatory urges on minors he "inherited" from his abuser Sekai. Entities hate her because by obsessing on her Akira doesn't focus on what they want him to do: abuse Ami, continue the cycle, thus making her into a new vessel for the voices/gods, as Akira, Sekai and Yuu have been as a result of a 'gifted' relative abusing them.
I am here also taking for valid the convoluted incestuous NiB family tree theory - Later on Pareidolia comes into being has the perfect scapegoat to blame for urges and actions Akira feels remorseful for
Last edited:
DeanNoriko
Member
- Aug 20, 2022
- 203
- 1,202
All this talk about Maya, Ami, Noriko and Niki not being real is making me have a headache.
I still find it more likely that Sel is just a dumb dumb and made a mistake mentioning Noriko in that scene and the proofreaders having dunce caps on. It's human to make mistakes.
However, of course there's a chance that it was intentional. But would he really hint at that being a possibility in this abstract way, by giving us doubts about the timelines?
Anyway, what I really wanted to say to escalate the discussion a little bit:
Now I don't really think this is very likely either, but it's probably easy to jump to conclusions because of some small details. Maybe I am missing something, but just some timeline continuity errors in an event that, for all we know, might also simply not be very accurate, is not enough for me to jump on this wagon. Naturally pink hair is as unlikely as naturally green, blue or purple hair.
Though Maya's hair color seems conveniently natural to me...
I still find it more likely that Sel is just a dumb dumb and made a mistake mentioning Noriko in that scene and the proofreaders having dunce caps on. It's human to make mistakes.
However, of course there's a chance that it was intentional. But would he really hint at that being a possibility in this abstract way, by giving us doubts about the timelines?
Anyway, what I really wanted to say to escalate the discussion a little bit:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Now I don't really think this is very likely either, but it's probably easy to jump to conclusions because of some small details. Maybe I am missing something, but just some timeline continuity errors in an event that, for all we know, might also simply not be very accurate, is not enough for me to jump on this wagon. Naturally pink hair is as unlikely as naturally green, blue or purple hair.
Though Maya's hair color seems conveniently natural to me...
JelF547
Well-Known Member
- Mar 15, 2023
- 1,059
- 2,093
If aging during reset cycle is possible, it'd likely already happend, so this theory is just weak
Yeah, Tsuneyo. I think that maybe she was in shock at the time. I've been around in lurk for while, but skimmed or skipped past most of the deep dive stuff in the thread. Isn't the running theory that Akira is being controlled by one of the entities while he's blacked out?
Last edited:
Meskal1ne
Newbie
- Oct 7, 2023
- 42
- 90
Doesnot matter if it was Pareidolia or Akira himself. Molly said that nothing bad happened and we have no reasons to not trust her. Othervise we have no reason to trust Sekai, and she was narrator in Tsuneyo's event. I take it as one of illussion(fake) or another realm made by Sekai.
LoveRedHairedGirl
Active Member
- Dec 18, 2020
- 863
- 2,735
Does he have proofreaders? Given that he is such a “good” man, any proofreaders he might have had left him years ago.
Sel was considerate enough to add a humping sound considering he rarely adds even a single animation every update lol
DeSkel15
Engaged Member
- Sep 29, 2019
- 2,633
- 9,214
Little late, but just to add to the timeline stuff:
Noriko was already following Sensei around when she was 3:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Noriko is confirmed to be 16 at the start:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
So, Ami and Noriko were probably born in July and August 2004 since they turn 16 in 2020.
This would mean Sekai and Mama Nakayama were knocked up in 2003, which is when 'Kyoto' should be taking place if Sekai is recently pregnant with Ami.
The Accident happens when Ami is 7 (assuming Sensei isn't rounding):
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
The last 8 years part probably wasn't counting this year:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Overall: That timeline might be around a year off, but it should be around those time periods when things happened, eitherway.
Except for Kyoto, since it simply doesn't fit if Sekai was just now pregnant with Ami, with Noriko already around, even though she should still be in her mother's womb.
Edit: Unless this 'Kyoto' Happy Event is meant to be some kind of confirmation that Ami is actually around a year younger than everyone, like Rin, and just no one is aware of it. Which could also explain her physical development, if time itself isn't simply deaging Ami to fit Sensei's taboo preference, retroactively, or some crap.
Last edited: