Like, I’m not saying outright that you’re wrong, and Sel has shown that he’s great at Wikipedia and adding impressive theoretical shit to his game. But I honestly think that the analysis is giving him way too much credit. Dude’s very likely just a pompous conceited ass, and that’s ok. We accept it, since the art is good. The amount of analysis we have here is in SPITE of the writer, not because he’s secretly 4D chess gaming by being a douche.
I just think it's a strange position to hold that while the
art is good, because the author is a tool, it
must be a happy accident. I said before that I'm not sure if "Sel" is a character he plays or if he is that giant of a dingus! I don't read the discord, and haven't really interacted with him at all. I'm not giving
him credit, I'm giving the
work credit. As I think most of us that actually play this game do, because if this isn't hitting, you'll scrub out before chapter 1 is finished.
What I *am* saying is that, whoever and whatever the author is, he's employing certain elements of craft. If you understand the craft he's employing you can theory craft better. But for the people that
loath minor choices breaking their saves, or your game bricking bc you didn't see a Happy Event, or feeling cheated by finding out that you've locked yourself out of purity routes because you didn't get a full green run, understanding what kind of
thing you're looking at will help you decided if you want to continue.
BC I think puzzles and this shit is only going to get more and more intense from here on out.
Like, I'm not even bringing up the Vivian Girls and what knowing
that story might mean to what's actually going on. But I would bet money that the creator of the game knows all about it.