I'm in rough agreement with you overall, but it's precisely how the suicide relates to other overarching ideas/theories/possible out of Kumon-Mi that inspired my hesitation to readily accept it. It kinda pigeon holes certian less abstract questions or unclear developments into being a certain way to allow for a suicide start to not only make sense, but also be impactful / "good writing." Putting it another way, if the suicide start is ultimately what we're working with, coming to that revelation in text due to several other less major or less individually impactful smaller mysteries being solved/revealed in the text would almost work really well. Resolving the metaphysical state of the setting or any open ended idea from the bottom up instead of top down is always more impactful, allows for the themes and character implications to resonate more, and this idea of a suicide start being acknowledged before confirmafion for all the pieces would that make it work goes directly against that. Gives a a sort of trickle down effect for theory crafting / thematic signifigance, very unsatisfying.In short: yes he trolls and contradicts himself all the time. He has a penchant for platforming and offering ridiculous theories in order to throw people off and obfuscate whether or not we are supposed to believe his words.
Also, while I totally agree that explicitly confirming Sensei did kill himself in the beginning scene of the game could potentially weaken the narrative meaning of the story as a whole, the idea itself isnt inherently problematic within the framework of the story and including elements we've discovered up until now. Just because Sensei may have successfully committed suicide before the start of the story doesn't mean that is the beginning thread and that nothing was fucked before that.]
Last edited: