vehemental
Member
- Jun 4, 2017
- 435
- 1,945
- 388
Crowdfunding support isn't the "cost" of something. Patronage doesn't buy you the content a creator produces, it supports them personally in their endeavor of creating it because you want it to exist, regardless of the price. If the game is completed, and let's say in some alternative universe it gets posted for sale on Steam, how much do you think it would sell for? Granted, it will be huge and might have a good story, but the graphics are from 2010 and the gameplay is... limited, at best. $20? $30? Any more would be preposterous. Let's say it takes 10 years to complete, which he has said is a distinct possibility (so that's 2030, with, again, 2010 graphics). A founding patron will have shelled out $600 in that time frame. Is the game "worth" $600? Absolutely not. No game is worth that much or has ever been worth that much on the mass market. It's only "worth" that much to super fans.This is kinda weird ngl, you're saying all the time and effort he puts into writing/posing/etc doesn't "cost" anything when it literally costs hours upon hours of time. Are you saying all the time he puts into making the game is worthless? From what I've seen in probably close to 2 years is that he works almost always 7 days a week, at many hours a day. He probably puts more hours into making the game/custom requests etc than most people do in their full time job.
He's pretty much a crowdfunded visual story writer. Stopping supporting someone whose content you enjoy because they don't "spend" enough of the money they make is up there on the stupidest reasons I've seen people stop their support.
99% of the gaming industry operates on the principle that the money is only made either in anticipation of or after the game's completion (unless you're Bethesda). Before crowdfunding, indie game developers put in all that work with zero recompense. Crowdfunding is a godsend for the industry, but you're not paying for the game, you're paying to support the game in the form of an investor who won't see any return after it's sale.
A month's worth of updates aren't worth $5. Getting them 2 weeks early isn't worth $5 either. Posting them 2 weeks early for $5/month patrons is perfectly fine for a creator to do, but getting as assmad as he has that one of those patrons decides to share that content is megalomaniacal, greedy, and entitled, especially when you already earn enough to live very comfortably - better than 99% of his patrons - given the entire "development budget" consists of his salary and licensing music.
The guy wants to buy a Lambo or something and is biting the hands that literally feed him because he's let his success go straight to his head, and it's not enough for him. It will never be enough for him, he'd be complaining just as loudly at twice the amount of support. This is what money and success does to a lot people.
Last edited: