You are wrong about one thing dear, you will hear from me again, but not anytime soon. I may even silently decide to subscribe, but I would never announce such a thing..
The stars don't mean anything.. If I gave it 3 would it make any difference? By the time I wrote one review, there are three new reviews giving you 5-stars. It is exactly what I was warning about.. you may see all these praises and choose to never improve because it is so easy to get distracted by them. Why listen to the truth when yes-men, 15/10 ratings and blind trust and loyalty exists?
It is not that I didn't enjoy your game, but I have rated it objectively about what it is right NOW. I am not distracted by future promises or my idea or desires with it.. because everyone has their own desires with a game, no matter what. Some like content A, some prefer content B, while some dislike content C. They think if they give better stars or keep giving money, they may get their desired outcome.. but that's far from the truth
If you understood the gist of my review, that is enough for me. I'm not pretending to be a guru telling you how to do stuff, listening or ignoring is all up to you. I hope you get the decent wage you desire.
Arrivederci
Well, it's clear we have different tastes. Personally, I’d give a game:
- **1/5**: A game I really disliked, especially if it made a lot of promises and ultimately disappointed me.
- **2/5**: A bad game—one play was enough to know it wasn’t something I would enjoy.
- **3/5**: An "okay" game—playable, and I might return to it.
- **4/5**: A good game that I genuinely enjoyed, and I would love to see more.
- **5/5**: An excellent game that exceeded my expectations, and I’d definitely want more of it.
In any case, I personally wouldn’t rate a game with a 1 or 2 if I simply liked what I saw but felt it was still too early to make a judgment, or just to avoid giving the devs an inflated sense of how their game is perceived.
Imagine if everyone rated a game the way you do—'The game was just launched, so I’ll rate it a 2 and maybe update later.' Good games would often get a 1 or 2 until they have more time in development. I believe this could make it harder for devs to get accurate feedback early on, especially if the game is still evolving.
That said, it’s your rating style, and I totally respect that—it’s just not how I personally approach it. Everyone has their own way of evaluating, and I’m no one to tell anyone how to rate games here.
PS: I was going to come up with something witty or ingenious to finish this, but my brain went on vacation. Maybe next time I'll have a punchline instead of this!