- Jun 7, 2017
- 140
- 38
Ren'Py Life in Santa County [v0.11.0] [Bold Bash Studios]
- Thread starter monroe
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating corruption creampie exhibitionism female domination footjob handjob lesbian male domination male protagonist management masturbation milf multiple endings oral sex point & click romance sandbox sex toys teasing titfuck vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
You must be registered to see the links
Seen on Twitter
FUCK PAYWALLS
--- NON ANIMATED 0.5.0 FULL GAME
your old saves will work.
--- NON ANIMATED 0.5.0 FULL GAME
your old saves will work.
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
Last edited:
- Jan 2, 2022
- 561
- 3,223
leaked the game this way, is not cool man!!!
Think in all the hard works of the DEVs had and respects his works!
brodie you downloaded it
- Jan 2, 2022
- 561
- 3,223
ok cool
- Feb 25, 2020
- 4,019
- 9,188
Devs don't owe anyone anything for free. If devs don't have some kind of paywall then vns/games probably wouldn't even get made or at the very least continue.
okay, im still gonna leak it though
- Mar 29, 2020
- 177
- 113
You are Savior for all of us who don't have any money for supporting Devs
We are very thankful for your sharing
It means a lot
- Sep 6, 2021
- 740
- 1,680
- Jul 1, 2021
- 50
- 98
- Nov 13, 2020
- 1,019
- 569
- Apr 14, 2019
- 233
- 1,229
I was looking through the last version of the walkthrough (since it hasn't been updated yet as of this posting) and I noticed the big decision to blow up the hideous blonde douchebag comes with +3 CHARISMA. Is that a typo? A goof in the game? Or is that working as intended? I feel like deciding to blow someone up, especially without speaking to them, is a pretty clear-cut case of Intimidation, no? And considering the reputation you acquire after doing that - a badass not to be messed with - I'm really scratching my head here trying to figure out what the thought process behind that was (if it was indeed intentional). It's not a big deal by any means, but could someone please explain the logic behind that decision granting +3 Charisma instead of +3 Intimidation? Genuinely curious.
If anything I'd expect doing it to grant +3 Intimidation and not doing it to grant +3 Charisma. What's the angle I'm missing?
If anything I'd expect doing it to grant +3 Intimidation and not doing it to grant +3 Charisma. What's the angle I'm missing?
Lmao...I'm in no way OCD, but I was just looking at that screenshot and asking myself...who tf does that!?
- Mar 14, 2020
- 271
- 342
I was too fixated on the legs to even noticeLmao...I'm in no way OCD, but I was just looking at that screenshot and asking myself...who tf does that!?