- Jun 21, 2018
- 6,575
- 4,776
just got this one recommended on steam and first time I see it in this site xD btw any chances of S2 having preggo?
Last edited:
- Nov 20, 2018
- 12,649
- 18,771
This game doesn't suck. Now go play and have fun.
I like how no matter what choices you make in the game it doesn't matter. According to the chapter recap I had sex with Freja twice even though I never did. Glad it doesn't matter the choices you make since the developer will just not care and continue the story the exact why they want. I don't know why developers do this, if you aren't going to honor choices made in the game why give the options, just make a linear story game without choices or write a book or something.
so no lilith, queen, and princess content yet? Just want to make it sure before i decided to download it.
- Jun 25, 2022
- 910
- 2,230
Still does the thing where if you leave the MC's name as JACK or rename it to MCNAMEHERE whenever a character says the MCs name they're shouting it. But if you try to make it 'Jack', the name of the speaker above the dialog box is the only one that's formatted properly.
Where is the milf content? From all preview images the Lis look to be about the same age if not younger than MC.
Still no one choice matter, game thinks that i sleep with everyone , even if i rfused them
- Mar 21, 2017
- 604
- 1,835
I thought I remembered the dev saying that they were reworking the VN so that choices were actually recognized in game, but it's still a thoroughly on rails experience. A shame, that.
- May 18, 2021
- 1,633
- 824
- Jul 18, 2019
- 304
- 611
- Feb 8, 2021
- 1,056
- 1,384
I was just about to make a comment about the fact that the game still acts like you did things with characters even if you didn't... like, just put a "skip scene" option instead of an ultimately pointless option to reject, resist, or ignore them. At least it plays along with your choice in the moment you make it at least, unlike certain other games that will give you 3 to 5 options when you actually only have one and would just shut you down anytime you try choosing anything else.
Last edited:
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,121
I've only just now started the mod porting process but I did notice the the dev upped the RenPy version (yet again) from v8.0.3 to v8.2.1
So, maybe. I'll be able to confirm in about half an hour or so... but devs really need to stop doing this. Stick with the damn RenPy version you started with until the VN is complete. Then (if you decide to write a new project VN) up to the most recent stable version of R. But... they will continue to do this unnecessary and futile exercise almost every time.
Hey bro,
You are absolutely right,
But since I’m no longer the programmer on the project I had to do it as my team was working on 8.2.1.
season 2, is done in the new ver as well.
We’ve been hard at work, to get season 2 ready for public for end of August, so time is not on my side here.
Thanks a bunch for all your help!
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,121
Let them know they can DL any RenPy version SDK they wish (any version)... I work on dozens of RenPy versions... you are not handcuffed to only one. I'm sure y'all know this but just making it clear just in case. Each SKD operates and runs independent of others installed on the same machine.
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,121
To answer a question, yes, a new replay is going to be recommended. I'm not done porting the original Core mod content over but there's new content in the previous storyline. For example the Outpost "freeroam" now includes a Jezz Dinner event that wasn't there before, etc. I'm sure there are other examples but as stated, I'm still processing everything so I can actually start working on the update content (this is going painfully slow due to the revisions in coding of the original content).
- Jan 19, 2020
- 12,382
- 49,121
Ummm.... what?
Joubei, let the team know: you set variables in conditionals after they've been declared in initialization, you don't declare variables in conditionals. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. All variables have one declared value... then set them as needed in the scripts via conditionals or other methods (direct setting via choices, Python functions, etc).
The above snippet... I don't think I've ever seen anything like that before... variable declarations via conditionals. It's like an oxymoron of sorts and certainly unorthodox. Maybe I haven't had enough caffeine yet but someone please school me on a base case where this would ever be acceptable in practice... this goes against every coding language documentation that I can think of tbh.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Joubei, let the team know: you set variables in conditionals after they've been declared in initialization, you don't declare variables in conditionals. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. All variables have one declared value... then set them as needed in the scripts via conditionals or other methods (direct setting via choices, Python functions, etc).
The above snippet... I don't think I've ever seen anything like that before... variable declarations via conditionals. It's like an oxymoron of sorts and certainly unorthodox. Maybe I haven't had enough caffeine yet but someone please school me on a base case where this would ever be acceptable in practice... this goes against every coding language documentation that I can think of tbh.
- Dec 17, 2021
- 4,027
- 10,201
I'm guessing the biggest problem with this, other than convention, is that those variables can never have a default state to return to?