- Sep 8, 2019
- 523
- 871
Yeah, and I'm also wrapped up in my own projects, so that definitely doesn't help matters. xDMost of the people who'd be capable of really making a splash are working on our own projects instead. Except for our one resident masochist trying to fix the performance issues lol
I've mostly been casually playing through LT and profiling it to come up with a list of CPU/memory pressure points so that I have a few things to tackle next time I have a lull in inspiration (or just aren't in the mood to translate x86 assembly to C…) with my other projects.
Speaking of LT…
I gave this a quick attempt tonight and things didn't go so well. OpenJDK 1.8 doesn't have JavaFX built-in like Oracle JDK 1.8 does, so it wouldn't even build. The other option would be to target JDK 11/OpenJFX 11, but even then I couldn't convince Maven to bundle OpenJFX into the JAR (and even if I could, the resulting JAR wouldn't work with Java 8, which is still Oracle's recommended version).I'll give it a crack if I have some free time this week. I'm not too familiar with Maven (and the Java build process in general, for that matter), so it'll be a nice learning experience.![]()
At some point I'll have to install IntelliJ on my Windows box and give it a shot on there, since I'm not too keen on polluting my Linux box with Oracle software.
java8-openjfx
package, since I'd prefer to keep my Java libs in my home directory) and see if I have better luck with that.