I don't think 2 men would be quite enough for Lisa
We'll be stirring in some black love for Lisa real soon
Yeah I totally agree bud. It'd certainly fall into the more "sinister content" criteria and would then of course be optional ^_^
Damn I can't wait to get back to Rubbins.. xD
Actually was not talking about the 2 men ThoughI don't think 2 men would be quite enough for Lisa
,But pushing Lisa's Orgasms limit,and makin Lisa really lose her consciousness
Actually was not talking about the 2 men Though
I'd say probably again in some time ^_^ since we just had a similar sort of instance in the Gathering's sharing route <3Actually was not talking about the 2 men Though
You're in luck the dev says so on this page, at least take the trouble to read a few posts back
and... I can help you. PaleGrass wrote it himself. , but the dark path is pulling me down (nice job).
In my opinion you could put the pillory in the context of a school trip to a museum in Renshire displaying various ancient medieval torture devices, Lisa is the chaperone and assistant to the students which includes Paul and his friends who could take revenge for the teasing with Lucas and this is where Paul's blackmail starts and forces Lisa immobilized in the pillory, so if you wanted the pillory at the end it wouldn't be so out of place.
Well that's A good idea,But you can't have Anything That is Kinda Skin show in it!probably a demonstration but no nudity in it kinda Stuff!
Paul can't invite Lisa anywhere initially, but only force her to go, because from the very beginning, like a cat with a dog...
Yeah, I suppose you could do that, but personally, I think that the pillory has potential for a much more dramatic scene, with much more serious characters. As fun as the Paul content is, and as much as I hope to see it continue, he and his buddies are just pansy-ass small fries. If Lisa is going to be stuck in a pillory, then let it be with someone whose malevolent intent is worthy of a medieval torture device, since that's what a pillory actually is.
Fortunately, no one is able to force the author to follow their wills. As for leaving him free to follow his inspiration, of course he's free, but he's also interested in feedback and suggestions from his supporters. He has always been interested in feedback and suggestions. The choice of what suggestions to implement, and to what extent to implement them, is still with him. No one should be hesitant to give their input, and no one should be surprised or offended if he doesn't use that input.
I said this because I realized that, in many games, the narrative line has taken a meaningless turn that doesn't fit the essence of the main story. But it's my perception, I could be wrong, and again, I don't want to give a negative review to anyone specifically. It's just my opinion of how the game could flow more naturally. In my view, the author already has an idea of the game's story in his mind, and it's probably structured and organized. When he tries to include narrative arcs outside of what he envisioned, the story gets a little lost and meaningless.
Sure, there are games that get derailed, permanently in some cases, because the developer is chasing top-tier subscriber bucks, but that's the choice of the individual developer. Some developers may feel that their best bet to complete their game is to do scenes "on commission", as it were. Personally, I prefer it when the developer has a clear vision for his or her story and sticks to it, which seems to be what you're saying that you prefer. But, even when the developer sticks to his or her own plan for the story, he or she can still accept feedback and suggestions from the supporters, and can implement quite a few of them without seriously derailing the story.
Maybe the old guy from the park will appear again later? I certainly wouldn't be opposed to it. And, since the game has a deviancy score for Lisa, I'm pretty sure that you can count on her becoming increasingly sluttish as things continue to progress, not that we haven't seen plenty of slutty behavior from her already.
I partly agree with the potential that the pillory could have for scenes that are more sadistic than dramatic, but I would like to point out that the pillory as a medieval tool punished the condemned person from the upper part of the body, that is: neck, head and face and the hands, which received from insults to rotten eggs and vegetables, to spitting and throwing excrement. It is we, the perverts of modern times, who would like to use it to hit other parts of the body, (it is not that I would not like it). In fact, it was only a clarification of the real use of the pillory in the Middle Ages and in Latin it derives the word "shame" of the one who received the punishment.
You're right that the primary function of a pillory was public humiliation. However, people were also flogged and otherwise beaten in pillories. In some documented cases, people were even branded, and there is at least one documented case from the late medieval period in England when a man had his ears cut off while he was in the pillory. And, even if there was no other "torture" for some people, the muscle cramping which often resulted from being locked in that position for what was at least an entire day, and often a period of a few days, was no laughing matter. I wasn't speaking lightly when I called it a medieval torture device, and I'm fairly well versed on medieval history.
