Is that comma after “Dee” in the fix? Because that’s a mistake.Son, I tell you, the years she lived with Dee, and me were the best years of my life!
Son, I tell you, the years she lived with Dee, and I were the best years of my life!
According to the rulebooks, it should be “Dee and me.” You say, “She lives with me,” not “She lives with I.” That being said, as others have pointed out, it’s perfectly valid to have characters use “incorrect” grammar. Plenty of people hypercorrect to “X and I” because they had that construction drilled into their heads in school.What's interesting about the I/me is the forum's embedded grammar check doesn't flag it either way. Neither did the grammar program I run the script though.
Who the fuck knows?![]()
That’s not a mistake. I found aAlthough, I could make a fool out of myself:
I think it is well established that spelling and grammar are not my strong suit....
You must be registered to see the links
post that covers it; essentially, “strange” is an attributive adjective modifying the direct object (“that spelling and grammar are not my strong suit”), akin to a construction such as, “I find him strange,” except that, since the object is a subordinate clause, it has to be replaced by a dummy subject (“it”). Or:- “I find [him] [strange],” has the same construction as,
- “I think [that spelling and grammar are not my strong suit] [well established],” but this sounds confusing, so we change it to,
- “I think [it (= sub. clause)] [well established] {that spelling and grammar are not my strong suit},” inserting a dummy subject and moving the subordinate clause to the end.