- Nov 20, 2017
- 5,608
- 13,332
Low Quality Reviews on f95
- Thread starter dusty stu
- Start date
- Apr 14, 2021
- 5,792
- 15,529
Facepalms are minority i'd say, most people probably don't even have 100 facepalms on their counters.
We could just remove facepalming altogether from the forum, problem solved.
- Nov 20, 2017
- 5,608
- 13,332
My own count says 61 and I don't think I (mostly) troll around here.
But for reaction itself, we "need" a "dislike" reaction, we have a like, so we should have one that is the opposite of it. Currently only facepalm is available for it. So then we would have the same with the dislike or whatever the new one would be called.
Other more radical solution would be to remove the whole reaction system itself.
- Jul 29, 2017
- 9,520
- 111,092
Facepalms are minority i'd say, most people probably don't even have 100 facepalms on their counters.
We could just remove facepalming altogether from the forum, problem solved.
...lots of headpats.....
- Apr 14, 2021
- 5,792
- 15,529
I don't think we need a dislike at all.
If you agree with someone throw them a like, and if not, just keep walking.
I think you got those because you actually asked for them somewhere... i'm pretty sure i remember you doing that yup.
- Jul 29, 2017
- 9,520
- 111,092
...shhh....don't snitch......I think you got those because you actually asked for them somewhere... i'm pretty sure i remember you doing that yup.
...and it was mostly a frog that did it......
- Nov 20, 2017
- 5,608
- 13,332
- Jul 29, 2017
- 9,520
- 111,092
- Nov 20, 2017
- 5,608
- 13,332
- Sep 12, 2018
- 679
- 1,214
Well, actually, I always wondered why they choose facepalm instead of normal dislike. As for me, facepalm is a very mean reaction and I've only used it twice in all my time on this forum. But, since we don't have dislike to simply show our disagreement with the person, users use facepalm instead, sigh.
Also, it looks absurd when such a reaction is given to the first post of a regular games on this forum. Games that were not created to troll or insult anyone.
Last edited:
Well, first what c3p0 wrote.Why not?
I'd rather see reviews by the popular boys/gals rather than some nobodies.
With messages on the counter you'll know that the person actually spent some time around here, and with likes you'll know that what they say carries at least some merit with which people tend to agree.
Also, if one really tries to, it can be somewhat easy to farm (at least some)
In both cases, it's of no informative value.
But I agree that a minimum message limit would not necessarily be wrong. 5 to 10 should be enough. After all, there is also a limit for starting private conversations or posting links.
Not for me, I have well over 100 facepalms.Facepalms are minority i'd say, most people probably don't even have 100 facepalms on their counters.
We could just remove facepalming altogether from the forum, problem solved.
- Jun 2, 2018
- 1,486
- 5,713
I have a 132 facepalms but most are by the same people getting triggered at me lol.
- Apr 14, 2021
- 5,792
- 15,529
- Sep 12, 2018
- 679
- 1,214
Maybe? In any case, it's hard to distinguish, if someone simply disagrees with the person, or find his whole narrative stupid. Also, as I said, I would better setting dislikes on rating reviews showing that they unhelpful, or far from truth and posts showing that I simply don't agree with them.I think you take this facepalming business a little too seriously my guy.
- Apr 14, 2021
- 5,792
- 15,529
But if we do this we'll let the cliques around here do revenge down-voting, won't we?
Who needs that kinda pain in the ass.
- Sep 12, 2018
- 679
- 1,214
As far, as I know, it's already a thing. I saw some messages from users who receive facepalms on their every post from the same user. So not much will change in this regard, but it will be easier to express our opinions, making them a bit more transparent.But if we do this we'll let the cliques around here do revenge down-voting, won't we?
Who needs that kinda pain in the ass.
- Aug 10, 2021
- 36
- 58
Here I am, agreeing with the OP that review quality could be better... but I can't find where submit a bloody review.
Apologies if this is a little off-topic (I'd rather ask here than start a new entire thread) - but do I need better glasses, or are there certain requirements (like having at least 100+ posts) to be able to start writing reviews?
Apologies if this is a little off-topic (I'd rather ask here than start a new entire thread) - but do I need better glasses, or are there certain requirements (like having at least 100+ posts) to be able to start writing reviews?
- Jul 29, 2017
- 9,520
- 111,092
..click the starsHere I am, agreeing with the OP that review quality could be better... but I can't find where submit a bloody review.
Apologies if this is a little off-topic (I'd rather ask here than start a new entire thread) - but do I need better glasses, or are there certain requirements (like having at least 100+ posts) to be able to start writing reviews?
