My point:
- 'recipient' MC contents are way easier to make:
- They receive all kinds of NPC (be that top or bottom), You only need to consider the writing / character of NPCs, who don't persist through your game like MC does (if you don't like this one, just use next one)
- There's this "Trope" that Random Strong NPC like to Top. Bara is full of strong NPC.
- Normally strong NPC "bottom" needs build up / certain fetish like mind-control or corruption - requires more work.
- On the other hand, 'giver' MC (Excessive top / bottom) makes a very strong present:
- You are making a strongly themed game;
- very easy to break "roleplay" immersion;
- NPCs need to bent to the will of MC, means less diversity, less creativity;
- If the game has equal amount of Top / Bottom for every NPC, then some of them will be shoehorned in "to fit the quota".
OK, I think I get what you mean now and I can agree that writing scenes where the MC is passed around by faceless NPCs is definitely easier and simpler to write than making actually developed romances with other characters that (sort of) naturally lead to intimacy.
I don't really agree, though, that the slant towards 'Top' MC content necessarily breaks immersion (even if that does happen sometimes).IMO, it doesn't require you to suspend your disbelief any more than any other erotic game premise, like how every NPC wants to have sex all the time or is very kinky and sexually fluid.
If for some players it's 'unrealistic' that all NPCs can bottom, then for me it's unrealistic that all of them are dom daddies who want to make the MC their cum dump or whatever.
TBH You are kinda outlier here. And you got me curious, I thought Bi are OK with both straight sex and gay sex, but you are saying you only want to fuck others, 'receiving' is a big No?
I mentioned this in my previous comment, but I don't necessarily read erotica to project onto the characters. It's not about whether "I" am 'receiving' or 'giving', "I" don't want to be a part of this. It's about how the characters are described and sexualised, and playing as a "Top" MC simply creates opportunities for scenes I want to see.
Without getting too TMI, if just to put a label on it, I guess it's something like a 'fetish' for manly bottoms (but with a lot of other qualifiers). It's not about a baseline sexual attraction to men, if there even is any. I understand, though, that I'm a pretty big outlier here.
So, from my perspective, I can't really agree with you here:
That's no difference from a bottom MC, just pronoun changes from "you (MC)" to "Logan / him".
The literal writing and wording could be the same between the scenes, but the crucial differences for me are that it's
Logan that's bottoming and that the MC scenes are written from a different perspective. They are written for the players to get off on Gunnar calling them a whore or turning them into his sex slave, and that's just simply not what I'm playing the game for.
What do you think about "Small on Top"?
Haven't played it since I don't really seek out strictly furry stuff, but looking at the itch.io page the premise
is something that would appeal to me (not really the small top part, but the buff muscle bottom part).