- Thread starter LazyBloodlines
- Start date
- Jun 5, 2021
- 133
- 122
I think in the future, most people will use AI to create storylines. and it will make the storyline be similar.
- Apr 25, 2017
- 406
- 1,788
- Aug 24, 2021
- 166
- 117
- Nov 24, 2017
- 136
- 346
So tired of this ai art crap. It's always just generic pin ups. Hopefully that lawsuit will have an effect so i wont see it anymore.
Last edited:
- Oct 21, 2019
- 43
- 86
Thanks to AI we now have a flood of game developer wannabes, perhaps 1 in 100 can actually be good, not the case for this one though
- Jul 13, 2018
- 3,032
- 10,129
- Aug 21, 2021
- 399
- 789
AI art is the new NTR, theres always a war in the forum, soon people will start making jokes as:" is AI art avoidable?"
- Apr 29, 2018
- 10,132
- 2,369
- Jan 17, 2018
- 38
- 139
Always happy to see AI trigger wannabee "artists". Bet you guys never picked a paintbrush in your life.
- Jul 7, 2018
- 133
- 138
how hard is it to put in a tag for ai games? then people who want them can find them and people who dont want them can stop complaining about ai art games?
You know what I hate the most? This 'fix' culture. Especially with when it involves 'fixing' other's arts.
- Jan 24, 2023
- 3
- 2
- Sep 21, 2021
- 169
- 317
Just from previews I can see that this is very lazy art.
Most likely no VAE is used, definitely no inpainting, defaultish style. I can forgive meh backgrounds because the focus is mostly on characters, but that focus is wasted, because you've made barely any effort to remove eye-catchy imperfections like shitty hands, bodyparts fusing into cloth and, unironically, eyes themselves. And that's what I saw at the first glance, I don't doubt I'd be able to find way more if I were incredibly nitpicky.
A hard pass.
At the very least the UI looks cleanish.
Most likely no VAE is used, definitely no inpainting, defaultish style. I can forgive meh backgrounds because the focus is mostly on characters, but that focus is wasted, because you've made barely any effort to remove eye-catchy imperfections like shitty hands, bodyparts fusing into cloth and, unironically, eyes themselves. And that's what I saw at the first glance, I don't doubt I'd be able to find way more if I were incredibly nitpicky.
A hard pass.
At the very least the UI looks cleanish.
- Nov 2, 2017
- 112
- 654
I find it interesting that people are so against AI art, but say nothing about the thousands of games on this site that use basic Honey Select/Koikatsu/etc. models (not to mention, the same unedited default model for the male MC). It's all the same level of low-effort jank to me.
And while there are lazy attempts like this, there's also edited AI art that's on point.
Basically, what I'm saying is... don't be a luddite.
And while there are lazy attempts like this, there's also edited AI art that's on point.
Basically, what I'm saying is... don't be a luddite.
Ex-fucking-xactly
Because of the easy accessibility of making games, whether using Koikatsu/HS or other software like AI art to make images, Ren'Py, RPGM or Unity for coding, and fucking Paint 3D for the user interface, we end up with cheap shit for the pure sake of making a quick buck and obviously you can see devs never actually have passion in this
Making games needs to be hard again, not for the sake of being hard it's so it drives away the people who want to make cheap shit for a quick buck, and there will be only people who are serious and passionate into making games will tackle it and we actually get good shit
It's like Japanese, a lot of weeaboos want to learn the language to watch anime without subs or flex on people, but when they actually try to tackle the language they just give up because it's too hard for them. And Japanese is a difficult language to learn. (I know this myself, I am currently suffering) so you will only have people who are serious and passionate into learning the language and end up learning it quite successfully and they become fluent.
Now, because game development has been easier the appeal of people wanting to make their very own game is there, but you end up having a lot of people taking advantage of it so they can make money off of it, it's obviously not a passion project for them, they just want money and fame.
Yeah I want the money and fame too, but if it was only for the money and fame I would've had my game out after a week, but no, I've spent ALMOST A YEAR on the entire thing, trying to fine-tune everything so it's perfect for not only myself, but for everyone else. Game developing is a passion of mine, not for these people. I'm not saying that you can't be passionate for this stuff, but it's obvious that the passion isn't there.
Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk™
If it was even remotely 'indistinguishable' from real art, then ppl wouldn't be able to so easily point it out. And some app puking something out in response to some variables some user input into someone ELSE'S app, isn't art. It's an app regurgitating crap based on whatever parameters the dev shoved into it.
Neither have devs using AI "art". Kinda why they're using it. And shoving out shit that for the straight to ignore list.
Looks at intro..." You will get power through sex " YES!!! YES!!!!!!!!!
Looks at tags......"You have got to be shitting me,no sex!!!!!"
Looks at dev...."Well? Yea.....waiting.....waiting...WHY JUST WHY?"
MC:With no power...mc kicks can...this is bullshit...my life sucks...my creator is a cruel being.
Looks at tags......"You have got to be shitting me,no sex!!!!!"
Looks at dev...."Well? Yea.....waiting.....waiting...WHY JUST WHY?"
MC:With no power...mc kicks can...this is bullshit...my life sucks...my creator is a cruel being.
- Jan 17, 2018
- 38
- 139
Why do you keep using the word "art" ? Nobody said it's art here, it's just an easy way to create assets. Having a pixiv account and uploading random AI pics you make doesn't make you an artist, drawing hentai or anime doesn't either. If it was like that, then all the kids in school who scribbled on their notebook would be artists. Art has lost its meaning nowadays, I don't see graphic designers calling themselves artists. The definition of art by Britannica is: "something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings."
I doubt if 80% of the shit on pixiv or twitter even counts as art. Just because you can use tools like photoshop to draw anime doesn't make you an artist. What are these "artists" expressing? Their greed for money? Most of them even said "what's the point of drawing if an AI can do it in 5 seconds" which really exposes them. If drawing was a passion of yours and not a tool to get money, then you wouldn't care because AI won't stop you from expressing yourself.
AI is a tool and should be used as one, people who call it art are delusional, even though it can mimic some really good paintings with the right models and prompts.