HTML Masters of Raana [v0.8.4.8 A1.1] [GrimDark]

[Storm4n]

Masters of Raana [v0.8.3.9 public] [GrimDark]

Modded html file for the t4 version of the game.

Replace the start_game.html file in your MoR folder.​

Does anyone have this but for the newest one? I've searched a few pages back but no luck

 

[Satalin]

Does anyone have this but for the newest one? I've searched a few pages back but no luck

look here

ok so i think i may have done it. i dont know if its perfect because the code is here and there but i got cheat debug working and i think everything else works too. let me know if you find some problems.

 

[SomeGuyj]

the person who gave me the t4 info said the developer had asked for it not to be posted on the forums, so i will not make that patch. and if you do please dont post it publicly.

Why would dev care? It's stupid, if no one posts it here, where should people look for it?

 

[SomeGuyj]

i may have been unclear. the developer has previously asked for the incest patch not to be shared on the forums because it can cause problems for them with patreon. they have not said anything about the t4 version even tho i can imagine they are not too happy about that either.

Bullshit, other devs never got punished for i_patch on other resources made by random people, this gatekeep doesn't make any sense. GD-studios , what's in it for you?
P.S.
What's "t4"?

 

[Storm4n]

That's so weird to have these "honor rules" in this forum which is basically a site for pirating games...

This ain't no official forum and I really doubt anyone is going to punish the devif there's an incest patch in a site with no relation to the dev or to any official dev or account at all.

 

[shizzlenizzle]

they asked nicely.

 

[GD-studios]

Bullshit, other devs never got punished for i_patch on other resources made by random people, this gatekeep doesn't make any sense. GD-studios , what's in it for you?
P.S.
What's "t4"?

It actually does make sense - as this particular patch violated F95's Rule number 7. I told the modder not to publicly post it mostly for his own's sake but also because of the possible problems it could create if a moderator would stick it to the OP.

 

[SomeGuyj]

[

It actually does make sense - as this particular patch violated F95's Rule number 7. I told the modder not to publicly post it mostly for his own's sake but also because of the possible problems it could create if a moderator would stick it to the OP.

Which rules are we talking about? If it's General rules, than it still doesn't make sense, because rule n7 is about age restriction, nothing about incest.

1. Content (a game, image, video, story, animation, etc.) depicting nudity, sexualization or sexual/erotic activity involving prepubescent character(s) is prohibited. A "prepubescent character" is one that visually shows no sign of puberty, or if non-visual is otherwise clearly intended to represent a prepubescent character. 2D and 'unrealistic' depictions are generally looked upon more favorably. As this involves some discretion, if you are unsure ask a Staff Member.
   1. This includes translations, bug fixes, etc for banned content.

There's not a single mention of incest in the rules at all.

 

[shizzlenizzle]

let me clear some things up

the quote from i received from the modder the developer talked to was this:
"It would be very, very appreciated if you refrained from posting incest patches in the open forums. It can potentially mean a catastrophic blow to the MoR franchise - which could in a worst case scenario hamper further progress of the game. Moderators here are very prone to add those patches on the front page. If Patreon sees that, I might be in trouble."

the code that person was using altered the check for age as well as relation which would have broken rule 7 on the forums.

quick edit: i don think the age check was completely removed but i understand the developers concern when those checks are altered.

 

[Aioria619]

There is no rule they have broken to be banned under, and acting like a dev is being unreasonable for maintaining an official stance of 'please don't pirate my paid content' is kind of absurd. Of course they are going to say that.

The reality is that when the T4 version does get shared, the devs politely ignore it as we pilfer it, which is all we can really ask of them.

On the other hand, booting the dev from the site achieves...what exactly? We lose a direct line to the game dev team and the easier ability to report bugs and make suggestions that comes with it all so you can maintain some kind of warm fuzzy feeling in your head about the ideological purity of a pirate site? Because you can't compel people to share a file with you either way, so it isn't like in the magical utopia you imagine where being 'not pirate enough' is a punishable offence that the people who otherwise wouldn't will suddenly share the t4 files, they just wouldn't post about them at all.

The game is already supported, I have spent more than 1000 dollars supporting developers, where do you think the donations come from? This is a pirate site used to share pirated content, and whenever the developers are involved people don't share anything, and I tell you again, do not come with higher morals to a pirate site, and in a game where it is about slavery

 

[SomeGuyj]

let me clear some things up

the quote from i received from the modder the developer talked to was this:
"It would be very, very appreciated if you refrained from posting incest patches in the open forums. It can potentially mean a catastrophic blow to the MoR franchise - which could in a worst case scenario hamper further progress of the game. Moderators here are very prone to add those patches on the front page. If Patreon sees that, I might be in trouble."

the code that person was using altered the check for age as well as relation which would have broken rule 7 on the forums.

quick edit: i don think the age check was completely removed but i understand the developers concern when those checks are altered.

So basically making the i_patch without removing age restriction would make 0 negative impact.
The part: "If Patreon sees that, I might be in trouble" is made up. 1st - patreon employee monitoring f95? Yeah, right. 2nd - they have no right to punish the developer for 3rd party mods. They can't prosecute creators for random modder's activity on a random website. They can't hold game developers accountable for something they have no control over and and there is no way to prove otherwise. I browsed through patreon policies and nothing like that is mentioned there.

GD-studios, it goes without saying, no wonder you were unhappy when the person that made the i_patch also removed age restriction, it's something that shouldn't be tolerated. But as for i_patch itself, there's no way anyone get's in trouble with it. And it's how it always has been.

P.S.
I remember the good old days when Patreon didn't even care for incest. STS, DMD and DOD hand unhidden incest and were published on patreon, lmao. And the only real reason they started to care is that they don't want do anything with questionable stuff . And it's the same thing - they cannot be held accountable for mods made by random people on third-party websites.

 

[shizzlenizzle]

i have a version with all the i content unblocked only over the age of 18 (tested with family start). pm if you want it.

 

[j01ntr0l1a]

Why do I play every new version of this game?
I am even always mildly annoyed, since I basically know everything beyond the new content.

Yet I still play every version...
I guess that's some kind of addiction.

lol i agree it is addicting

 

[SomeGuyj]

i have a version with all the i content unblocked only over the age of 18 (tested with family start). pm if you want it.

I can't pm you . Can you please send it to me?

 

[shizzlenizzle]

View attachment 4584888
I can't pm you . Can you please send it to me?

sent. it was weird because i tried sending it as a message to you before making the post and i got the same error. worked now tho.

 

[Gunner Rey]

What happens if you don't help Aria with the rebellion? Do you basically lock yourself out of content? Can you still get Clea without helping Aria?

The other path(s) have not yet been completed yet, but I do know you can acquire Clea without completing the entire quest, though I have helped Aria's friends a little because that made it easier to get into her pants. Otherwise I've 'helped' Aria to a Corruption of 100 with 100s on most sex skills and look forward to the day I can lead her into the Mastersphere on a leash stark naked save for her collar and cuffs wiggling her hot little ass that's about to brutally gangfucked after she's danced for their entertainment.

I just want it to be a ruse (in part) as I want to keep her and plan to help her rebellion succeed in part, she just needs to 'sacrifice' a bit and she's wise enough to realize some sore fuckholes and a bellyfull of manjuice is quite a bit less that what many leaders have endured to help their people.

 

[SomeGuyj]

sent. it was weird because i tried sending it as a message to you before making the post and i got the same error. worked now tho.

Thank you! I really appreciate it.

 

[Seamonkey]

The game is already supported, I have spent more than 1000 dollars supporting developers, where do you think the donations come from? This is a pirate site used to share pirated content, and whenever the developers are involved people don't share anything, and I tell you again, do not come with higher morals to a pirate site, and in a game where it is about slavery

That...didn't actually address anything I said? All you did was reiterate your point while going on about how much you support devs which while nice doesn't change the fact that Devs existing on the site doesn't break any rules, nor do people declining to give you pirated content for any reason.

No one is bringing morals into this except you, my original point didn't have a moral element to it at all and like I said earlier, paid versions of the game have already been shared in this thread before so your assertion that devs being around stops people sharing is just false.

Ultimately if you think devs shouldn't be allowed on the site, this really isn't the thread for it, you should be bringing it up in the site feedback section of the forum, surely? Y'know, where something might actually be able to be done about it.

 

[Jack Torres]

Picked this game back up after a long hiatus. The new features look fantastic so far.

Curious about one of the six Fast Travel buttons that are accessible in the house; I cannot find it.

The ones found so far, buttons ordered from left to right:
1- "Marston Ave,"
2 - "Use Shrine,"
3 - "Imogen's Barrow,"
4 - "The Academy"
5 -
6 - "Watery Eyes"

It is likely something so obvious, that I will kick myself sideways once I find out.

 

[Gunner Rey]

Picked this game back up after a long hiatus. The new features look fantastic so far.

Curious about one of the six Fast Travel buttons that are accessible in the house; I cannot find it.

The ones found so far, buttons ordered from left to right:
1- "Marston Ave,"
2 - "Use Shrine,"
3 - "Imogen's Barrow,"
4 - "The Academy"
5 -
6 - "Watery Eyes"

It is likely something so obvious, that I will kick myself sideways once I find out.

It's a new one, "Red River Basin." It sends you to where you'd be if you took the boat out of Darkmere. It costs money just like if you took the ferry.