OhGodNotAgain
Well-Known Member
- Aug 11, 2023
- 1,715
- 4,678
Just out of curiosity, why and who decided that 1.0 = finished?Version 1.0 implies differently. If there's still WIP scenes it should have been version 0.10.
Just out of curiosity, why and who decided that 1.0 = finished?Version 1.0 implies differently. If there's still WIP scenes it should have been version 0.10.
I always wondered where my half sister came from after my parents got divorced and my mother remarried, but then I learned about the stork.The thought of a female character fucking one person is such a foreign concept to some people it's almost comical.
God did. The first man was the Homo 0.1 (also known as the Antecessor as the version name) and went up to Homo 0.14 (Rudolfensis) until the Sapiens version was ready and was released as 1.0 after a short time in beta. He still felt something was lacking so he patched a variation known as Homo 1.1, or commonly refered to as "woman".Just out of curiosity, why and who decided that 1.0 = finished?
Because the fantasy does not, in majority cases at least, translate into real world. I like NTR in porn, I will die before I agree with any kind of cheating IRL, but if somebody wants to swing then go for it, who cares, it is consensual.Pretty much everyone can distinguish between real life and fiction. There's a diagnose for people who can't. So this argument is very much missing the point. Do you think people who have emotional reactions to fiction are convinced that what's happening is actually real?
I'm sure you have heard of what's called suspension of disbelief. In order to enjoy fiction we do have to deceive ourselves (or be deceived?) somewhat in order to enjoy a good story. That allows as to 'believe' what is happening, it allows as to empathize with the characters. If we don't, we don't really care about what's happening in the story.
Have you noticed that even in a video game it's much easier to kill a monster or some thug with a gun than a character with a personality, or someone who's begging you to spare them? That's because they are humanized - they're given actions or emotions you can relate to. Most people, unless they have psychopathic traits, will be at least somewhat distraught about killing such characters. Feels a bit real. That's when the whole "It's just a video game" defense kicks in.
What does this have to do with NTR? The genre usually (yes, there are plenty of exceptions) portrays a sociopathic, aggressively masculine, immoral character manipulating, coercing or raping a woman until she starts liking sex with him, because apparently that's sexy. It portrays a ruined relationship or ruined hopes for one, it mocks sexual inexperience, shyness, low social skills and it tends to bodyshame. And the characters involved, even if the plot is dumb as hell, tend to be plenty humanized, because that's kind of required for NTR to work. And yet here we have hordes of NTR fans not only having no trouble with it (or purposefully desensitizing themselves to it), but masturbating to the whole idea. So why are ntr fans acting surprised that some people might have problems with how popular the genre is.
Most of the ape devs on here have nonsensical versioning systems, but the trend is a.b.c where each new b is a new content patch, and 1.0 usually means the game is pretty much done, but it seems like some devs forget that they can count past 9...Indeed I agree, but that's on the developer and their version naming.
I do get your point and not surprised why people doesnt like ntr. It is simple. you said it yourself "It portrays a ruined relationship or ruined hopes for one, it mocks sexual inexperience, shyness, low social skills and it tends to bodyshame." Or low selfsteem people. And to some that is a fact in real life. So judging from what you said i believe you are one of them.(+people who hate ntr but also acting they hate vanilla for a cover) you didnt see neither i think you understand my point.Although you triedhard enough to seems to have a neutral ground, but in the end it became obvious.Pretty much everyone can distinguish between real life and fiction. There's a diagnose for people who can't. So this argument is very much missing the point. Do you think people who have emotional reactions to fiction are convinced that what's happening is actually real?
I'm sure you have heard of what's called suspension of disbelief. In order to enjoy fiction we do have to deceive ourselves (or be deceived?) somewhat in order to enjoy a good story. That allows as to 'believe' what is happening, it allows as to empathize with the characters. If we don't, we don't really care about what's happening in the story.
Have you noticed that even in a video game it's much easier to kill a monster or some thug with a gun than a character with a personality, or someone who's begging you to spare them? That's because they are humanized - they're given actions or emotions you can relate to. Most people, unless they have psychopathic traits, will be at least somewhat distraught about killing such characters. Feels a bit real. That's when the whole "It's just a video game" defense kicks in.
What does this have to do with NTR? The genre usually (yes, there are plenty of exceptions) portrays a sociopathic, aggressively masculine, immoral character manipulating, coercing or raping a woman until she starts liking sex with him, because apparently that's sexy. It portrays a ruined relationship or ruined hopes for one, it mocks sexual inexperience, shyness, low social skills and it tends to bodyshame. And the characters involved, even if the plot is dumb as hell, tend to be plenty humanized, because that's kind of required for NTR to work. And yet here we have hordes of NTR fans not only having no trouble with it (or purposefully desensitizing themselves to it), but masturbating to the whole idea. So why are ntr fans acting surprised that some people might have problems with how popular the genre is.
Do you have sources to back up that claim?majority of ntr fans are female
There are plenty of non ntr games with the same thing.females likes masculine confident and agressive male
Most NTR is targeted at men - women have almost no agency, it doesn't focus on their internal thoughts and feelings except standard ntr cliche phrasing that has a more voyeuristic feel, it portrays women in the typical virgin/slut axis, it satisfies the male power fantasy of a woman being humiliated and 'turned' by dick size and magic sexual prowess.So "why are ntr fans acting surprised that some people might have problems with how popular the genre is."
Simple. majority of ntr fans are female, and females likes masculine confident and agressive male.
So if you cant understand that. ntr is really just who you self insert yourself into. And obviously people will insert them self in who they can relate the most or like.(mostly)
YesDo you have sources to back up that claim?
I burried the evidence
Civilians like you should not pry
There are plenty of non ntr games with the same thing.
Must be tough for you bruh.Most NTR is targeted at men - women have almost no agency, it doesn't focus on their internal thoughts and feelings except standard ntr cliche phrasing that has a more voyeuristic feel, it portrays women in the typical virgin/slut axis, it satisfies the male power fantasy of a woman being humiliated and 'turned' by dick size and magic sexual prowess.
And I doubt you're a woman because you use "male" and "female" to make your standard incel talking point.
The vast majority of ntr fans I've seen are not women, they're coomers. As far as I know women who are into stuff like this gravitate more towards omegaverse type of content, but I'm willing to be educated on that.