Ren'Py Mobile of Desires [Ch.6.46.9] [QuantumBunnyNovels]

[stahalle]

Apparently I should rewrite the explanation for all the values in the game
The game has separate choices, let's call them Important choices, that lead the player down a certain path. These choices are labeled through Emoji.

There are non-essential choices that give additional content, these choices either give some points, be it lust, love, bond or willpower. Or elections that are only available if you have some sort of value for those stats.

In other words, your values of these values give you extra content on key branches, but getting to a particular branch depends on your choices in "significant choices"

than explain to me when i choose the devil most of the time why i get only the sharing option at one point.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

than explain to me when i choose the devil most of the time why i get only the sharing option at one point.

Can you tell me exactly at what point you get NTS content if you were selecting everything for NTR content before that?

 

[stahalle]

i said most of the time. so i choose ntr all the time than love when it comes to going to the bar with Lucy and Maria. and the next choice when she asked if we see each other i can only choose the sharing option.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

i said most of the time. so i choose ntr all the time than love when it comes to going to the bar with Lucy and Maria. and the next choice when she asked if we see each other i can only choose the sharing option.

Sorry, I may have translation problems, please clarify, did you choose 100% of the NTR options or did you have at least one case when you chose another option? This is important because right now the game doesn't have a final flag for each path separately yet, it will only appear in the upcoming additions. There will be 3 pure options when the player chose only options of this branch and one hybrid one, which I'll finish faster and concentrate on clean branches.

 

[AL.d]

you have sharing bound to bonding and love to willpower. it would make so much more sense if you would bound sharing to lust and love to bond. and yeah i followed them i choose most of the time the evil and 1 time the heart.

I've had the exact same in the previous update, haven't played this yet. Majority devil choices with two love. No nts choice whatsoever. And yet they started having cuck talk out of the blue.

 

[stahalle]

Sorry, I may have translation problems, please clarify, did you choose 100% of the NTR options or did you have at least one case when you chose another option? This is important because right now the game doesn't have a final flag for each path separately yet, it will only appear in the upcoming additions. There will be 3 pure options when the player chose only options of this branch and one hybrid one, which I'll finish faster and concentrate on clean branches.

no i didnt used the ntr option every time. i used the love option one time.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

no i didnt used the ntr option every time. i used the love option one time.

Alas, anything that is not pure Love path or not pure NTR path, it will all be a hybrid on the NTS path. There is no other way to realize this system, otherwise it would be necessary either not to make elections meaningful, or a very, very complex system of elections, messages and consequences

 

[AL.d]

Alas, anything that is not pure Love path or not pure NTR path, it will all be a hybrid on the NTS path. There is no other way to realize this system, otherwise it would be necessary either not to make elections meaningful, or a very, very complex system of elections, messages and consequences

Why would a mix of ntr and love choices lead to the nts path when no nts choice has been taken?

Also the way you are doing it, leads to fully kinetic game. You don't even need to see what the choice is about, you just mindlessly click the one with the "right" icon.

In general, ntr in a completely broken relationship, is pointless. To do full ntr path in this, you gotta have the dude act like a complete asshole and practically stop having a relationship with the fiance. What's the point of ntr in this, if they don't even have a relationship at this point.

 

[stahalle]

Alas, anything that is not pure Love path or not pure NTR path, it will all be a hybrid on the NTS path. There is no other way to realize this system, otherwise it would be necessary either not to make elections meaningful, or a very, very complex system of elections, messages and consequences

look

you made it so that if you have high bond you can only choose the sharing here. the problem would be solved if you change that to lust instead of bond. and bond to the love path. and that would erase so much confusion.

 

[stahalle]

everyone playing a game like this would asume that the value for the love path is bond because its the value you get the most. but you made the value for the love path willpower. so if someone plays your game for the first time he ultimatly lands on the sharing path because he has bond the highest value.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

Why would a mix of ntr and love choices lead to the nts path when no nts choice has been taken?

Also the way you are doing it, leads to fully kinetic game. You don't even need to see what the choice is about, you just mindlessly click the one with the "right" icon.

In general, ntr in a completely broken relationship, is pointless. To do full ntr path in this, you gotta have the dude act like a complete asshole and practically stop having a relationship with the fiance. What's the point of ntr in this, if they don't even have a relationship at this point.

I misspoke, if you did all the NTR choices and one NTS, you'll be thrown to the Hybrid branch, which will be "under branch NTS"

As for the kenetic novel, my game is not like that. You go on your branch, you choose options that give you points or take them away. From the number of those points, you either will or will not have additional menus of choices with additional context for that branch. You have a choice.

Regarding Oscar and Lucy's relationship on the NTR path. In this game, I want to make it a condition for NTR to "wrong" a player's relationship choices. I realize that NTR can be in a perfect relationship, but those are different fetishes. And if it's not what you want in my game, then alas.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

everyone playing a game like this would asume that the value for the love path is bond because its the value you get the most. but you made the value for the love path willpower. so if someone plays your game for the first time he ultimatly lands on the sharing path because he has bond the highest value.

Yes, you're right. That's my shortcoming, thank you. I will fix it and make new hints in the new version

 

[stahalle]

I misspoke, if you did all the NTR choices and one NTS, you'll be thrown to the Hybrid branch, which will be "under branch NTS"

As for the kenetic novel, my game is not like that. You go on your branch, you choose options that give you points or take them away. From the number of those points, you either will or will not have additional menus of choices with additional context for that branch. You have a choice.

Regarding Oscar and Lucy's relationship on the NTR path. In this game, I want to make it a condition for NTR to "wrong" a player's relationship choices. I realize that NTR can be in a perfect relationship, but those are different fetishes. And if it's not what you want in my game, then alas.

This ist how i understand what he wants to tell you. You only have the option to go full ntr or full love everything else puts you in the nts path. If you want to play a realistic scenario where every relationship hast its flaws and you make some wrong and some right decissions its ends in sharing and that ist not realistic. you take away the option to play it in the way the player wants to play it so it gets kinetic.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

This ist how i understand what he wants to tell you. You only have the option to go full ntr or full love everything else puts you in the nts path. If you want to play a realistic scenario where every relationship hast its flaws and you make some wrong and some right decissions its ends in sharing and that ist not realistic. you take away the option to play it in the way the player wants to play it so it gets kinetic.

And if a player wants a Godzilla with laser cannons in the game, but it won't be there, does that make the game kinetic? By your logic, if the player can't play the game the way he wants, that makes it kinetic. no, I partially agree with you, the more "rails" in the game, the less freedom in the game, the more the game is "kinetic".

Yes, in my game there are certain conditional conditions to go down a certain path, and if those conditions are not met there is no way to go down that path. And there are a number of choices with unique content. Yes, there's not complete freedom, but there are no choices. It's a middle ground. I never said anywhere that the game would be completely free. In the first version of the game, there was only an NTR branch.

 

[stahalle]

And if a player wants a Godzilla with laser cannons in the game, but it won't be there, does that make the game kinetic? By your logic, if the player can't play the game the way he wants, that makes it kinetic. no, I partially agree with you, the more "rails" in the game, the less freedom in the game, the more the game is "kinetic".

Yes, in my game there are certain conditional conditions to go down a certain path, and if those conditions are not met there is no way to go down that path. And there are a number of choices with unique content. Yes, there's not complete freedom, but there are no choices. It's a middle ground. I never said anywhere that the game would be completely free. In the first version of the game, there was only an NTR branch.

You are right but you neither said its not possible to mix routes.

 

[AL.d]

And if a player wants a Godzilla with laser cannons in the game, but it won't be there, does that make the game kinetic? By your logic, if the player can't play the game the way he wants, that makes it kinetic. no, I partially agree with you, the more "rails" in the game, the less freedom in the game, the more the game is "kinetic".

Yes, in my game there are certain conditional conditions to go down a certain path, and if those conditions are not met there is no way to go down that path. And there are a number of choices with unique content. Yes, there's not complete freedom, but there are no choices. It's a middle ground. I never said anywhere that the game would be completely free. In the first version of the game, there was only an NTR branch.

Amusing analogy. Also false and nonsensical.

I wouldn't expect a full degree of freedom. But I would expect some basic freedom in a game with choices and the results of those choices, to make sense. If I mainly pick ntr choices and mix in there one or two love choices, because I think that asshole should meet the girl once in a while, it makes no sense for the game to turn him into a willing cuckold. If I have to 100% make ntr choices for that path to work properly, then it's fully linear. AKA kinetic.

 

[zelpin990]

Are old saved nuked with the latest version?

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

Are old saved nuked with the latest version?

https://f95zone.to/threads/mobile-of-desires-ch-4-34-91-quantumbunnynovels.257664/post-17884555

 

[Eye-switcher]

Selected devil choices all the way to after the runway then the next devil choice is greyed out and I cant choose it, replayed it twice but its still greyed out. Overly complicated for my taste unfortunately.

 

[QuantumBunnyNovels]

Selected devil choices all the way to after the runway then the next devil choice is greyed out and I cant choose it, replayed it twice but its still greyed out. Overly complicated for my taste unfortunately.

Yes, that's my mistake, I'll fix it in the new version on September 5th