I normally do not comment on other people's opinions; but trying to say a mother is justified in emotionally torturing her son who she is supposed to love and care for because he was a little mouthy is crazy talk.
I thought he was going to snap and kill them all.
Nothing wrong with commenting on my opinion if it was actually the opinion I had in the first place which I never did. I would prefer not to be morally judged for things I never said. Then again if you think blackmailing your parent with career ruination is being mouthy maybe you personally have poor reading comprehension. I don't know anybody in my life that would ever do that to their parents or any parent that would tolerate it.
I know I wrote a lot but I made it clear the mother is a groomer and a bad person but unlike 95% NTR antagonists she did it as a defensive measure. Never did I justify how far she went or the fact the Female lead was revealed to be groomed by the MC's mother.
While her response was extreme and went way too far he started the conflict by trying to ruin his mother's career because he was jealous over a woman that was never into him. Relationships go both ways and in terms of family bonds he severed it first by making it clear it didn't bother him at all that he can ruin his mother's life. Thinking that love should be unconditional because of a parental bond leads to abuse espeically if the expectations are one sided.
Most NTR antagonists are just complete assholes that do it to the MC just because they can and they don't care that was the difference that I pointed out not that I justified her actions. I argued the reason to initiate the NTR was more justifiable than other NTR antagonists not the extent or the methods she used when NTRing her son. Here is the quote from what I wrote
'I still feel out of all NTR adult games she is one of the most justifiable antagonists when initiating the NTR as she warned her son not to try and ruin her life before doing anything.'
You chose to ignore the context of what I wrote.
