- Nov 22, 2021
- 952
- 413
At the moment Sue's breasts are not very big. They're definitely above average in size, enough to get her plenty of attention. But it's clear this is just the starter size, and she'll be getting much bigger implants ( plus other enhancements) in the future, once Randall and Lucia have persuaded her to adopt the bimbo lifestyle.How big are tits
Scarlet(gf) tits are best right now but sue have nice ass though, not the best comparing with other games but it'll do.At the moment Sue's breasts are not very big. They're definitely above average in size, enough to get her plenty of attention. But it's clear this is just the starter size, and she'll be getting much bigger implants ( plus other enhancements) in the future, once Randall and Lucia have persuaded her to adopt the bimbo lifestyle
Yeah, there should be a female protagonist tag. I think it depends how you play Randall. If he's dominant it makes a lot less sense, but if he's submissive it makes perfect sense. When you make the first decision that determines whether Randall will be Dom or Sub, on the sub choice, he even says that he prefers women who make there own decisions. I think it also depends whether you've chosen for Sue to be exclusive to Randall, or make her into a slut. Because the second choice will effectively put her in the driving seat, when it comes to sex.Scarlet(gf) tits are best right now but sue have nice ass though, not the best comparing with other games but it'll do.
And like you said that is one route to get her bigger implants(corruption) or maybe rivalry/jealously happen between them & she'll go for bigger one.
Btw instagram content is very interesting too, comment option is not available yet it'll be nice to join other creepers in comment section just kidding just kidding
Only thing I dont like is making choices for sue, there should be female protagonist tag.I dont know its just kills the mood/thrill.
NO NTR game needs a female protag because it turns the game into a SLUT game not a NTR game when you are forced to play as a female protag instead of playing as the cuck as you should be doing in a NTR game.there should be a female protagonist tag
Ngl blud I understand the og dude's point. The game makes it seem like it's giving you a choice between full on bimbo with fake tits or a lesser path. If I didn't read these comments (Even after reading the description that just says an overview on bimbofication, corruption and NTR. While it doesn't say any of them are avoidable we go by how the game presents these choices it really does make anyone think there was at least a choice with the fake stuff, which isn't required for the bimbofication kink, despite being very present in it.Well you were foolish, because bimbofication means just that. It's pretty obvious, if you read the overview properly ( which I assume you didn't) that Sue is going to be transformed into a bimbo, and the usual element of that is big fake tits. The title of the game on it's own, is pretty self explainatory. How could you seriously believe a guy with a Bimbo Dream, wouldn't want to transform Sue into a bimbo?
Personally, if you don't like bimbofication content or even big fake tits in general, I don't see anything wrong with that or you saying you don't like it on this thread. But you weren't just expressing your dislike of the content, you were essentially attacking the Dev, for not providing you with the option, not to transform Sue into a bimbo. That would have completely undermined the main theme of this game, which is bimbofication. The MC starts the game already obsessed about bimbos, and with a long held fantasy about transforming Sue into one. Giving you the option not to do that, would totally contradict what this game is supposed to be about, and that is frankly ludicrous. And you're surprised when some people treat such a proposition with contempt?
Do yourself a favour. In future read a game's overview and tags properly, before deciding to download and play it. This will save you a lot of wasted effort.
I totally disagree with that. At no point does it suggest anything of the sort. The very first choice that you make for Randall concerning Sue, he says 'Of course I want you to have bigger boobs' and that's for BOTH choices. So I'm totally not getting how you can interpret that as meaning there should be a lesser path, where the MC chooses not to persuade Sue to get fake tits. Because it can only mean one thing. That Randall is going to persuade Sue to get breast implants, whatever choices you ultimately make.Ngl blud I understand the og dude's point. The game makes it seem like it's giving you a choice between full on bimbo with fake tits or a lesser path. If I didn't read these comments (Even after reading the description that just says an overview on bimbofication, corruption and NTR. While it doesn't say any of them are avoidable we go by how the game presents these choices it really does make anyone think there was at least a choice with the fake stuff, which isn't required for the bimbofication kink, despite being very present in it.
Maybe that is not the point. He could dream about it but life does not grant him this. Sometimes, I even like to play a path that is against my likings at first, in order to make the second path even sweeter. So, there is a posibility.How could you seriously believe a guy with a Bimbo Dream, wouldn't want to transform Sue into a bimbo?
But yeah, this is a good point.But you weren't just expressing your dislike of the content
Thanks for thinking about and replying to my thoughts. I partly agree with you. Maybe we can come to an agreement. People who active "enhance" the sexual parts of their bodies might at least have some relation to their sexuality and their "bodyness".A woman can "upgrade" her body for her own self esteem without becoming more open sexually and that what happens in most case. Some women does make changes to be more sexually attractive and active but it's not even close to be a majority.
I don't know. I think, it all comes down to the way you express your opinion. If it it true or even constructive criticism, why not? Why should I have to buy the Mona Lisa in order to be able to say that I don't find that picture that attractive?What's funny to me is when people who haven't spent a penny express their dissatisfaction.
Yeah, if you were going purely by the title, but the description says this is a bimbofication game. It's like walking into a steakhouse and expressing your dislike of steak, when there are plenty of other restaurants next door; it's dumb.Maybe that is not the point. He could dream about it but life does not grant him this. Sometimes, I even like to play a path that is against my likings at first, in order to make the second path even sweeter. So, there is a posibility.
But...
But why? Some of them do also have a nice salad or side-dish for people who don't like steak.Yeah, if you were going purely by the title, but the description says this is a bimbofication game. It's like walking into a steakhouse and expressing your dislike of steak, when there are plenty of other restaurants next door; it's dumb.
Because there's plenty of restaurants that are not steakhouses next door, no one walks into a steakhouse with the express purpose of getting a salad unless they have to.But why? Some of them do also have a nice salad or side-dish for people who don't like steak.
You see a nice looking restaurant with friendly personal and a sunny terrace that looks inviting. You get the card and see that it does not have any salad, so you express your disappointment and move on. Not a big deal.
I completely agree with you, criticism and not faultfinding . As for politeness, as one person said, I am responsible for what I said, and not for how someone understood it. It's like trolling, if you don't respond to it, then the troll gets dirty himself (the parable of the monkey in the aquarium)Maybe that is not the point. He could dream about it but life does not grant him this. Sometimes, I even like to play a path that is against my likings at first, in order to make the second path even sweeter. So, there is a posibility.
But...
But yeah, this is a good point.
Thanks for thinking about and replying to my thoughts. I partly agree with you. Maybe we can come to an agreement. People who active "enhance" the sexual parts of their bodies might at least have some relation to their sexuality and their "bodyness".
But ok, you are right that the sexual "enhancements" do not need to mean they want more sex. They just want to be more sexually attractive... more attractive through sexual means. They could even despise sex but like the attention of aroused males.
I hate to think this way, but yeah, you are right. I should not mix a sexual attractant with real lust for sex. Like the Venus Fly Trap does not really want to feed the flies.
I don't know. I think, it all comes down to the way you express your opinion. If it it true or even constructive criticism, why not? Why should I have to buy the Mona Lisa in order to be able to say that I don't find that picture that attractive?
What you really shouldn't do is demand chances or be inpolite. But honest criticism can helpt the creator not being poisened by only positive comments from bootlickers.
You're welcome. Civilized debates are always productiveThanks for thinking about and replying to my thoughts. I partly agree with you. Maybe we can come to an agreement. People who active "enhance" the sexual parts of their bodies might at least have some relation to their sexuality and their "bodyness".
But ok, you are right that the sexual "enhancements" do not need to mean they want more sex. They just want to be more sexually attractive... more attractive through sexual means. They could even despise sex but like the attention of aroused males.
I hate to think this way, but yeah, you are right. I should not mix a sexual attractant with real lust for sex. Like the Venus Fly Trap does not really want to feed the flies.