- Sep 15, 2017
- 1,056
- 4,033
My likesI just noticed everybody has hit zero Likes now
I can't deal with that!
My likesI just noticed everybody has hit zero Likes now
I have enough trouble calculating how much time has passed between waking up and going to bed ... assuming I remember to do the latter.Have your calculated how much hours approximately take to do a playthrough?
I had to try!I have enough trouble calculating how much time has passed between waking up and going to bed ... assuming I remember to do the latter.
To be honest though, even in the second run I'm probably skipping some of the scenes I either remember better or don't quite hold my attention as well as others, so I'd say the second run was probably between 10-15% shorter, and the third was when I started noticing things, so that probably only 7-10% shorter than the first.
But actual numbers? That requires an attention to spacial detail that I, frankly, just don't have.
Yea, that's happened to me every time I post since last night ... it shows up when you refresh though (not that there's a point when it'll still be 0)I just noticed my likes went from 0 to non existent
View attachment 2513730
As a Martha's simp, I can't say antyhing less than that this is definitely the last optionLately I get some comments about the updates feeling short, when every update is bigger than the previous one. I don't know if it's because the players who comment on it don't follow all the girls' paths or if they are so engaged with the game and the girls that it feel short for that reason. I hope it's the last one
Calling the MC old is already a tongue-in-cheek joke that will happen from time to time.
had that too but now i'm back to zeroI just noticed my likes went from 0 to non existent
View attachment 2513730
don't worry brother it's an April Fool's prank I'm pretty sureI just noticed my likes went from 0 to non existent
View attachment 2513730
bro you may not believe this but monogamy is in my blood it's the only way I play I don't care about missing contentI had to try!
Some players ask me about how many hours, and I have no idea how much time it would take going full harem, imagine rejecting girls!
I've tried to do two monogamy playthroughs with Martha and Erika, they "mostly" work but there are some sentences that don't make a lot of sense, like the MC saying that "perhaps in the future, he wants to be with other girls".bro you may not believe this but monogamy is in my blood it's the only way I play I don't care about missing content
I don't mind if a game has a harem as long as it's optional
but is it just me or finding games with a good solo route is really hard these days
![]()
I can't read and I don't know anything about game developmentI've tried to do two monogamy playthroughs with Martha and Erika, they "mostly" work but there are some sentences that don't make a lot of sense, like the MC saying that "perhaps in the future, he wants to be with other girls".
The biggest problem there is that, as a dev, I can't know if a player is monogamous or only has rejected the girls that have been shown up to that moment because he doesn't like them. There is the possibility that he likes only X and has rejected A, B, and C, but when Z shows up, he decides to be with X and Z. If the MC has told X "I only want to be with you" he will be cheating on X with Z.I can't read and I don't know anything about game development
I think it can be fixed with a small changed to dialogue like I don't want to be with anyone else but you
I'm not sure but I think when other people Test games they don't test the solo routes
because finding people who like monogamy is really rare
If you ever retcon every menu, could you consider adding randomized pregnancy, I think it's better that way.The biggest problem there is that, as a dev, I can't know if a player is monogamous or only has rejected the girls that have been shown up to that moment because he doesn't like them. There is the possibility that he likes only X and has rejected A, B, and C, but when Z shows up, he decides to be with X and Z. If the MC has told X "I only want to be with you" he will be cheating on X with Z.
The only way I can do it is, when the player opens a path with a girl, if it's the first girl he opens a path with, to ask:
a.- Open path
b.- Close path
c.- Open path monogamously
It would sound blunt, but it will be effective. The problem with doing it now is that I should retcon every menu, and the saves wouldn't be compatible.
Perhaps a thing to implement in the next game I do.
I asked the Patrons before taking a decision about it and they voted for full control.If you ever retcon every menu, could you consider adding randomized pregnancy, I think it's better that way.
I was thinking more or less something like this when I said that.Sex menu for every girl:
A-Creampie no consequences (if 2=B or if 1=No)
B-Creampie risk of pregnancy (if 2=A and 1=Yes)
C-Creampie 100% pregnancy (if 2=B and 1=Yes)
D-Outside (for example) (indifferent of choice on menus 1 and 2)
That's why I thought it would be an idea in a 'retcon' for every menu but I didn't think about other parts of the game, especially saves.Implementing that in a retcon right now would be overcomplicated, making the saves not compatible, but it's an idea I'm looking forward to use in the next game.
I respect that, it shows how much respect you have to your patreons. Thanks for the explanations.I asked the Patrons before taking a decision about it and they voted for full control.
My idea was random pregnancies with a complicated formula taking into account the girl's age, number of creampies, if the girl was on birth control, and some other variables. But they voted against it, so that won't change, it would be like telling them their vote was worthless.
Never compromise the game you want to make to please the few ... or the one ...I asked the Patrons before taking a decision about it and they voted for full control.
My idea was random pregnancies with a complicated formula taking into account the girl's age, number of creampies, if the girl was on birth control, and some other variables. But they voted against it, so that won't change, it would be like telling them their vote was worthless.
For the next game, I have an idea that would combine both options:
Menu 1:
Pregnancies enabled (Yes/No)
Menu 2 (only if 1=Yes):
A-Random Pregnancies
B-Full control My Dorm Style
Sex menu for every girl:
A-Creampie no consequences (if 2=B or if 1=No)
B-Creampie risk of pregnancy (if 2=A and 1=Yes)
C-Creampie 100% pregnancy (if 2=B and 1=Yes)
D-Outside (for example) (indifferent of choice on menus 1 and 2)
Implementing that in a retcon right now would be overcomplicated, making the saves not compatible, but it's an idea I'm looking forward to use in the next game.
Seems like such a weird question... counter with 'How quickly do you read?" I tend to fly through these unfortunately cause I'm a fast reader, but that's ok, I still enjoy the ride.I had to try!
Some players ask me about how many hours, and I have no idea how much time it would take going full harem, imagine rejecting girls!
You think too much about that. And then you stopped one step short of the goal.I asked the Patrons before taking a decision about it and they voted for full control.
My idea was random pregnancies with a complicated formula taking into account the girl's age, number of creampies, if the girl was on birth control, and some other variables. But they voted against it, so that won't change, it would be like telling them their vote was worthless.
For the next game, I have an idea that would combine both options:
Menu 1:
Pregnancies enabled (Yes/No)
Menu 2 (only if 1=Yes):
A-Random Pregnancies
B-Full control My Dorm Style
Sex menu for every girl:
A-Creampie no consequences (if 2=B or if 1=No)
B-Creampie risk of pregnancy (if 2=A and 1=Yes)
C-Creampie 100% pregnancy (if 2=B and 1=Yes)
D-Outside (for example) (indifferent of choice on menus 1 and 2)
Implementing that in a retcon right now would be overcomplicated, making the saves not compatible, but it's an idea I'm looking forward to use in the next game.