HornyyPussy
Board Buff
- Apr 26, 2020
- 18,916
- 44,839
- 998
The girls sure but how about the WOMEN!?
Nah, he's just a stubborn old crouch
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg ahegao anal sex animated big ass big tits corruption creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination graphic violence groping group sex handjob harem humor interracial lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game multiple endings oral sex pregnancy romance sex toys teasing titfuck urination vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
snakeplisskin
Well-Known Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 1,877
- 3,920
- 458
Hey just stopping in to say that i absolutely loved the update. Damn the Daphene sex scene helped her jump quite a bit on my waifu list.
Now I just need to convince Trop to let Eva go full ginger, so i can enjoy ginger twins without Erika needing to lose her goth edge.
Edit: Just realized we could have ginger triplets Trop make it happen.
Now I just need to convince Trop to let Eva go full ginger, so i can enjoy ginger twins without Erika needing to lose her goth edge.
Edit: Just realized we could have ginger triplets Trop make it happen.
Last edited:
- Apr 11, 2022
- 4,027
- 25,070
- 657
Yes, everyone will have a solo ending. There are different endings planned:
* Celibate
* 28xSolo (each one consisting of a "module" and a "specific" part)
* Harem (2-28 LIs) without family members (adding all the modules involved and a story to glue them together)
* Harem (2-28 LIs) with family members (adding all the modules involved and a (different) story to glue them together). This one won't be available in the unpatched version.
You can, but... do you WANT?
FatGiant
Conversation Conqueror
- Jan 7, 2022
- 6,707
- 22,330
- 803
DS, I'll use this quote, but what I'll type isn't exactly FOR YOU. It's more of a philosophical meandering of ideas. Like you know I like to do, so, please don't feel attacked.
The problem with that way of thinking, that when we share we feel loss, is based on a sense of property. While I recognize it, I think it is not warranted. Especially since we are talking about (digital versions of fictional) people. It is easy to feel ownership, to feel territorial, to feel authorized to own. But, it isn't a right. It is not even something that the "person" (in this case a fac-simile of one) can give you, at least under common law.
The fact remains that when you share you may trade exclusivity for abundance. I'll explain. When the relationship is ONLY between you and one person, you BOTH have exclusivity. When you introduce more persons into the relationship, exclusivity changes into the group, but you personally, trade that exclusivity for an abundance of options.
This could potentially be considered a "loss", but only if exclusivity is the only thing you're interested. If, however, the interest is in the relationship, it is anything but a "loss", it is actually a "Profit". For ALL.
When you share, you have MORE, way MORE, because sharing is the antithesis of ownership. Instead of the right to deny access (ownership), you have the right to access extra resources (sharing).
I understand that many are raised on the idea that the only way is to own and be owned. It will be a struggle for an adaptation to a share and be shared paradigm.
I just wanted to point out that there's no real "loss" when sharing.
Peace
- Apr 11, 2022
- 4,027
- 25,070
- 657
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
johnpouljones
Well-Known Member
- Oct 17, 2023
- 1,321
- 2,208
- 396
snakeplisskin
Well-Known Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 1,877
- 3,920
- 458
I for some reason was remembering her as brunette with red highlights lol damn sleep deprivation.
divingmedic
Engaged Member
- Aug 15, 2023
- 2,696
- 3,870
- 396
Dark Silence
Devoted Member
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,617
- 14,843
- 811
Hmm... I know it's not directed at me per se, but I feel I need to respond to this. I personally don't feel any loss, I'm just a greedy man. Some might say it's a flaw. Whether that's true or not, I don't agree. As I will share my food, my drink, and my car, even my home if need be, because I refuse to allow someone I know to be homeless. I will however never share my women or my motorcycle. Those are off limits. Touch them and I will become the beast of nightmares.DS, I'll use this quote, but what I'll type isn't exactly FOR YOU. It's more of a philosophical meandering of ideas. Like you know I like to do, so, please don't feel attacked.
The problem with that way of thinking, that when we share we feel loss, is based on a sense of property. While I recognize it, I think it is not warranted. Especially since we are talking about (digital versions of fictional) people. It is easy to feel ownership, to feel territorial, to feel authorized to own. But, it isn't a right. It is not even something that the "person" (in this case a fac-simile of one) can give you, at least under common law.
The fact remains that when you share you may trade exclusivity for abundance. I'll explain. When the relationship is ONLY between you and one person, you BOTH have exclusivity. When you introduce more persons into the relationship, exclusivity changes into the group, but you personally, trade that exclusivity for an abundance of options.
This could potentially be considered a "loss", but only if exclusivity is the only thing you're interested. If, however, the interest is in the relationship, it is anything but a "loss", it is actually a "Profit". For ALL.
When you share, you have MORE, way MORE, because sharing is the antithesis of ownership. Instead of the right to deny access (ownership), you have the right to access extra resources (sharing).
I understand that many are raised on the idea that the only way is to own and be owned. It will be a struggle for an adaptation to a share and be shared paradigm.
I just wanted to point out that there's no real "loss" when sharing.
Peace
I'm happy to hear that. Because my next solo will be with and forgive me here, as I forgot her name. The fitgirl with short hair.Yes, everyone will have a solo ending. There are different endings planned:
* Celibate
* 28xSolo (each one consisting of a "module" and a "specific" part)
* Harem (2-28 LIs) without family members (adding all the modules involved and a story to glue them together)
* Harem (2-28 LIs) with family members (adding all the modules involved and a (different) story to glue them together). This one won't be available in the unpatched version.
You can, but... do you WANT?
MAGO-DAG
Forum Fanatic
- Sep 1, 2023
- 5,831
- 25,985
- 821
divingmedic
Engaged Member
- Aug 15, 2023
- 2,696
- 3,870
- 396
FatGiant
Conversation Conqueror
- Jan 7, 2022
- 6,707
- 22,330
- 803
It really isn't for YOU, but you were the motor of the idea...
wookie ookie
Forum Fanatic
- Aug 30, 2021
- 4,658
- 9,412
- 627
Damn more than enough ginger, oh hell I'm totally over overwhelmed don't know if I can handle it might die by ginger
- Apr 11, 2022
- 4,027
- 25,070
- 657
I forgot to answer this part of your post, sorry.
You don't have to share them.
They will NEVER do anything lewd with each other without you present.
You can block lesbian interactions so, if there's any interaction during an X-some, it won't happen in your playthrough. That kind of interaction ONLY will happen during X-somes.
You don't share. You are the one who is shared!
Work is the thing that scares me the less. Not being able to deliver is what keeps me awake in the night
Yeah! I think Ren'py has "infinite" save pages.Are there enough save slots for that many?
Dark Silence
Devoted Member
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,617
- 14,843
- 811
Stop usin me as your catalyst to get the motor runnin. I'm just a simple man and not to be used in such a way. I have feelins to. Damn it!It really isn't for YOU, but you were the motor of the idea...
Dark Silence
Devoted Member
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,617
- 14,843
- 811
HornyyPussy
Board Buff
- Apr 26, 2020
- 18,916
- 44,839
- 998
No..........not really.........You can, but... do you WANT?
- Apr 11, 2022
- 4,027
- 25,070
- 657
I would love to be shared! My wife doesn't allow me!DS, I'll use this quote, but what I'll type isn't exactly FOR YOU. It's more of a philosophical meandering of ideas. Like you know I like to do, so, please don't feel attacked.
The problem with that way of thinking, that when we share we feel loss, is based on a sense of property. While I recognize it, I think it is not warranted. Especially since we are talking about (digital versions of fictional) people. It is easy to feel ownership, to feel territorial, to feel authorized to own. But, it isn't a right. It is not even something that the "person" (in this case a fac-simile of one) can give you, at least under common law.
The fact remains that when you share you may trade exclusivity for abundance. I'll explain. When the relationship is ONLY between you and one person, you BOTH have exclusivity. When you introduce more persons into the relationship, exclusivity changes into the group, but you personally, trade that exclusivity for an abundance of options.
This could potentially be considered a "loss", but only if exclusivity is the only thing you're interested. If, however, the interest is in the relationship, it is anything but a "loss", it is actually a "Profit". For ALL.
When you share, you have MORE, way MORE, because sharing is the antithesis of ownership. Instead of the right to deny access (ownership), you have the right to access extra resources (sharing).
I understand that many are raised on the idea that the only way is to own and be owned. It will be a struggle for an adaptation to a share and be shared paradigm.
I just wanted to point out that there's no real "loss" when sharing.
Peace
J/K my love, if you are reading this. You know you are enough for me
Eva forgives you. She has stopped cleaning her arsenal.
You don't share the things you ride, right?
Almost! Debbie/Deborah
As said, you can block it from happening and you will see a shorter or different version of that scene. First scene where it happens in 0.14 (a different choice). Second in 0.16 (some renders don't happen)
Dark Silence
Devoted Member
- Jul 17, 2021
- 9,617
- 14,843
- 811
I hope you like the couch, bro.I would love to be shared! My wife doesn't allow me!
J/K my love, if you are reading this. You know you are enough for me
Ok. I just had to double check. Sometimes I ask the same question differently in order to make sure.You don't share the things you ride, right?
As said, you can block it from happening and you will see a shorter or different version of that scene. First scene where it happens in 0.14 (a different choice). Second in 0.16 (some renders don't happen)
divingmedic
Engaged Member
- Aug 15, 2023
- 2,696
- 3,870
- 396
LMAO I happy I even remembered that much.I would love to be shared! My wife doesn't allow me!
J/K my love, if you are reading this. You know you are enough for me
Eva forgives you. She has stopped cleaning her arsenal.
You don't share the things you ride, right?
Almost! Debbie/Deborah
As said, you can block it from happening and you will see a shorter or different version of that scene. First scene where it happens in 0.14 (a different choice). Second in 0.16 (some renders don't happen)