TonyMurray

Conversation Conqueror
Apr 8, 2024
6,553
12,430
774
If Huutch would have done his tasks as he was ordered he would have called the clients on monday. That's the first thing you'd normally do as a salesman especially when you are ordered to shore up the relationship!
So when he get asked he would immediately have responded with "I called them on monday".
This is something you don't forget.
He would even remember if it was last friday, but when someone comes up with a couple of days ago then your common sense says it might be longer than a week ago because he can't remember about the important task he was given!

Huutch said "...a couple of days ago", then Christian mentioned the "...warning" and Huutch came up with "I did", then facepalmed himself and added "I thought I had".
Result he didn't shore up the relatioship with the 2 clients!

If your common sense says otherwise, I'd recommend a scan or b12, or kepp your hands above the table when playing porn games.
There you go again with trying to make an argument using assumptions :LOL:

1) Why would he have had to call on Monday? Given that you have no idea when he was given the instruction, you can't make comment on what was a good or bad day to have completed the task. There is literally nothing here to base an argument on, because we don't have (likely never will have) enough information. (If he was given the task last Tuesday, he would have called Tuesday or Wednesday, for instance, he wouldn't wait until Monday.)
2) How do you know he didn't call them on Monday? Just because he didn't specify it was Monday he called them means nothing. He said on Wednesday "a couple of days ago", for which Monday is a valid variable.
3) There is literally nothing wrong with saying "a couple of days ago", it doesn't mean you don't remember exactly what day it was, it's just a way of saying that it wasn't today, or yesterday, but it was earlier in the week.
4) A week is seven days, "a couple" is unspecified, but is generally taken to refer to two. I don't think anyone would presume "a couple of days" to mean more than a week.
5) Once more, we don't know when the instruction to shore up clients was given, so even if it was a week ago that Hutch called (despite saying "a couple of days ago"), that could still have been him completing the task, and doing so immediately after it was set.
6) Your interpretation of events is that by facepalming and saying "I thought I did" it can only mean that he forgot to make the call and complete the task. I know you're adamant on this one, but trust me, it's not the only possibility. You're making a big leap to say that it automatically means he didn't make a call to complete the task, especially when there are two points he is responding to (called them, shored them up).
7) This list of really easy to put together points is now at seven - equal to the number of days in a week. Would you refer to this as "a couple of points"? I wouldn't, but your argument suggests pretty much everyone else would.

Saying which... I don't speak for everyone, but if I were to guess, I'd imagine a lot of people are fed up of hearing this back and forth about such a trivial thing - I know I am, as entertaining as some of the arguments are. Therefore, I'm not going to point out the errors in your future arguments on it. Again, I'm not even saying that your standpoint is wrong, but the arguments you're using to back it up are really flimsy and largely assumptive, despite your apparent dislike of using assumptions.
 

JoeBlogs

Member
Nov 18, 2017
275
619
239
And she uses the reason that its all for hutch in an attempt to justify it to herself to essentially deflect that she's doing a bad thing and that's it more about her now than it is hutch
It's always been about her, she just doesn't want to admit that.

I was just correcting the mammuth text from Joe which had some incorrect information on some points which one could easily recognize by reading my post.
Duuuuuude. Seriously.... Duuuuuuuude.
You need to improve you form of argumentative writing. Using speculations and declaring them as facts, do not make them facts.
We are all just shooting the shit, and expressing our opinions on an imaginative story. We are trying to make sense of what we have watched.

Many of your "arguments" (and I mean with the looses possible definition) against my opinions only reinforce them. I wont bother anymore.
But hey, knock yourself out, whatever floats your boat, do it!


Y'all are starting to go insane. Maybe this will calm the restless natives.
Are they in a bathroom or a bedroom? Is this in next version? What is the context!
 

Luc77

Active Member
Jul 15, 2022
828
892
216
Y'all are starting to go insane. Maybe this will calm the restless natives.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
new context
this is of course an extension of the meeting at the bar -but at this point it looks like a meeting arranged by CHRIS
who sends Vivian to a client (whom she is supposed to meet at a bar) - who, to Vivian's surprise, is a woman :)

0.6 - Viv now in full whore mode
 
  • Like
Reactions: zernex and Bosti
4.50 star(s) 193 Votes