JoeBlogs
Member
- Nov 18, 2017
- 252
- 475
We have prematurely left philosophy 101, and are now taking philosophy 201 it seams. 
The 3D animators are "Polished Jade Bell" on the left (Kiriko and DVA from Overwatch) and other random shots and the right is "Bamh3d" (Ahri character from KDA)tell me your signature come from pls.
But to expand on this just a little, despite her screen time, I do not consider Vivian to be the main character
If you're trying to identify the main character based on the just the title, then surely Christian would be the main character. I don't know how you figure the title makes "boss" a secondary character ("husband" is acceptable reasoning though).How can you not consider her the main character when the whole games is called My Husband's Boss ? Both The Husband and The Boss automatically become secondary characters.
No, because the title has the possessive "My Husband's Boss", indicating the Point-of-View of the wife.If you're trying to identify the main character based on the just the title, then surely Christian would be the main character. I don't know how you figure the title makes "boss" a secondary character ("husband" is acceptable reasoning though).
No, because the title has the possessive "My Husband's Boss", indicating the Point-of-View of the wife.
Yes, but "point of view" doesn't necessarily mean "main character", that is essentially telling us who the narrator is. It's possible to have a first-person story where the pov narrator is not the main character, they are basically telling someone else's story, but from their viewpoint. The Shawshank Redemption is a good example of this, where Red is the narrator, but the main character/protagonist, is Andy. It's Red telling Andy's story, so the comparative title there could be "My Prison Friend" - where it's the "friend" who is the main character, not the "My".No, because the title has the possessive "My Husband's Boss", indicating the Point-of-View of the wife.
This is true on the basis of the phrasing of the title.No, because the title has the possessive "My Husband's Boss", indicating the Point-of-View of the wife.
It's called polite discussion, and it's what a forum is for.Some of you mf need to touch some grass.Put the tin foil hats away and socialize more.Cars..main protagonist...whats next her pubic hair lenght?
Porn ruined some of you.
Most couple games with this theme have both MMC and FMC pov, it's better if you search here, because mods delete comments of asking for recs. https://f95zone.to/forums/recommendations-identification.104/Truly amazing game, I really had so much fun playing it and can't wait to see what SC Stories is cooking for the next updateAny similar game recommendations from a MHB player perspective? Thank you.
I suppose the whole issue here then stems from the word "Main Character", which would be true for Vivian, Hutch, and Christian.Yes, but "point of view" doesn't necessarily mean "main character", that is essentially telling us who the narrator is. It's possible to have a first-person story where the pov narrator is not the main character, they are basically telling someone else's story, but from their viewpoint. The Shawshank Redemption is a good example of this, where Red is the narrator, but the main character/protagonist, is Andy. It's Red telling Andy's story, so the comparative title there could be "My Prison Friend" - where it's the "friend" who is the main character, not the "My".
To be clear, I'm not suggesting that Christian is the MC here, I'm just pointing out the broken logic of using the game title alone to confirm Vivian as MC.
The "narrator" IS undependable, that's at least my understanding, in the sense that he is not consistent and that he changes in what he shows us and where he is silent. It's like a movie, like a Hitchcock movie: the ambition is not to have a consistent voice (or several for that matter) of an auctorial narrator or of a perspective of a protagonist, but the aim is to manipulate the audience (in a good way): to be flexbile with regard to what is shown and what is not shown to achieve the maximum effect, to nudge the audience and to make the audience think and feel about the interesting aspects of the story. And everything else is downstream of that goal and changes therefore from scene to scene. There is not ONE perspective or voice in Psycho either.HHB would mean a narrator who is undependable
in 0.2 we also have two narrators, in fact it is clear from the dev's words that it is difficult to determine who is the most important here. The story is about Vivian's “adventures” - as seen from her or Hutch's eyes. At the same time, the dev leaves us to interpret the emotions that are rolling over Hutch, without describing his thoughts. One could put it this way: Vivian is the object of the story but Hutch the subjectThe "narrator" IS undependable, that's at least my understanding, in the sense that he is not consistent and that he changes in what he shows us and where he is silent. It's like a movie, like a Hitchcock movie: the ambition is not to have a consistent voice (or several for that matter) of an auctorial narrator or of a perspective of a protagonist, but the aim is to manipulate the audience (in a good way): to be flexbile with regard to what is shown and what is not shown to achieve the maximum effect, to nudge the audience and to make the audience think and feel about the interesting aspects of the story. And everything else is downstream of that goal and changes therefore from scene to scene. There is not ONE perspective or voice in Psycho either.