I take it they are licensed to sell prints and posters of Negisaray's work?You must be registered to see the links
I take it they are licensed to sell prints and posters of Negisaray's work?You must be registered to see the links
Why not? there is a fine line between beating off to an artist's work for free, and stealing their work to sell as your own.It wouldn't bother me if they weren't.
Yes, and I'm sure Negisaray paid Disney for Star Wars and Marvel license so he could earn money by portraying their characters.and stealing their work to sell as your own.
Right, and I’m sure Negisaray has permission from Disney to draw their characters sucking dick, getting fucked and all that other stuff, or permission from Warner Brithers as wellWhy not? there is a fine line between beating off to an artist's work for free, and stealing their work to sell as your own.
Right, and I’m sure Negisaray has permission from Disney to draw their characters sucking dick, getting fucked and all that other stuff, or permission from Warner Brithers as well
You have a pretty weak understanding of the concept of fair use and parody.Right, and I’m sure Negisaray has permission from Disney to draw their characters sucking dick, getting fucked and all that other stuff, or permission from Warner Brithers as well
Tell that to Nintendo lately.You have a pretty weak understanding of the concept of fair use and parody.
when have you known Disney to not fuck someone up the ass when their characters are used?You have a pretty weak understanding of the concept of fair use and parody.
I'm not talking about making Marvel smut or Rule 34 in general. That's okay. What's not okay is taking a picture of Daisy Ridley's face, putting it in a gangbang scene and asking money for it, while calling someone who prints posters a thief. If using likenesses of celebrities in porn would be okay, adult film makers would get crazy rich by selling pro quality deepfakes.You have a pretty weak understanding of the concept of fair use and parody.
exactly, there’s a huge difference between a parody and rule 34 piece, and taking an actresses exact likeness and putting them into sexual situations, and thinking that said artist really has any legal Rights when they’re using the exact likeness of celebsI'm not talking about making Marvel smut or Rule 34 in general. That's okay. What's not okay is taking a picture of Daisy Ridley's face, putting it in a gangbang scene and asking money for it, while calling someone who prints posters a thief. If using likenesses of celebrities in porn would be okay, adult film makers would get crazy rich by selling pro quality deepfakes.
Finally we are!Thanks for the update mindoss75
I see we are back to the exaggerated huge tits period again ...
It kinda doesn't work if you know the person they are based on is not fucking stackedFinally we are!
I disagree. alternate_breast_size is one of my favorite tags.It kinda doesn't work if you know the person they are based on is not fucking stacked
With Negisaray it was always hit-or-miss (more good than bad), unlike other artists like Ninjartist, Demonlorddante, Tarakanovich or Stray, who are way more consistent quality wise.I do not like. I think Negisaray is losing quality.
I wholeheartedly agree, accurate body depictions work much better for r34 content. With all the variants (pussy/anal, in/out, cum/no cum) Negisaray does regular/huge breasts variations would be nice, too (since there seems to be an audience for unrealistically huge knockers).It kinda doesn't work if you know the person they are based on is not fucking stacked