GammaReborn
Active Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 751
- 768
- 145
False Positive.windows blocked this executable. is it safe? i ask because it wasn't defender that blocked it, and there was the option to run it. so i'm unsure what it means.
False Positive.windows blocked this executable. is it safe? i ask because it wasn't defender that blocked it, and there was the option to run it. so i'm unsure what it means.
Not exactly, since it didn't come from Widows Defender. It's more like, "Are you sure you want to execute this program that we don't know anything about?"False Positive.
Oh. Thats not windows blocking it then, its just warning you that it doesn't know what it is.Not exactly, since it didn't come from Widows Defender. It's more like, "Are you sure you want to execute this program that we don't know anything about?"
I mean, it is technically blocking the execution until you tell Windows that you trust that application. It's just not a Windows Defender alert like the ones we see shared in this site every week.Oh. Thats not windows blocking it then, its just warning you that it doesn't know what it is.
i remember there was an option for this.2. I don't like that MC has micro penis
There was, I don't know if it still exist but either option is still really silly small dick compared to just about everyone elsei remember there was an option for this.
you get to choose your size.
though i dont replay previous chapters on new versions.
is it still there or was it removed?
Yes, there is a choice. This choice is an important part of the plot…There was, I don't know if it still exist but either option is still really silly small dick compared to just about everyone else
I’ve got this idea: the MC wants to give Vanilla something luxurious.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Hi.I think what should be considered a "good game" should be independent of one's personal preference.
If you happen to not like chocolate ice cream, you don't have to eat it. And you certainly don't have to go around saying that's bad ice cream, when your issue with it isn't its taste but its flavour.
It's important to label things properly . It isn't necessarily lazy writing . The writer could just be unaware of how to make it better , so inexperience is more appropriate but regardless I do see the writer trying and putting in effort . So I wouldn't say it's lazy . If you think you can help by pointing them in the right direction of better literary devices then do proceed to do so .Hi.
You’re mistaken.
He’s not talking about tastes or preferences in genres. He’s talking about logic, about perception, about the fact that making the character dumber than even in anime is the height of absurdity.
The only way to justify this stupidity is a personal fetish—the MC pretends not to understand, thereby provoking feelings of jealousy and adrenaline. In other words, in the story, he chooses to put on the mask of a complete idiot so that the experience feels as intense as possible.
However, the same effect could be achieved using subtler, more literary methods. No need to bring a sledgehammer to swat a fly. Yes, making someone dumb always works. But that’s lazy writing. And this laziness shouldn’t be justified with other tastes or ice cream.
I don't want to be rude. But whatever this spam you're writing is supposed to achieve is beyond me.Hi.
You’re mistaken.
He’s not talking about tastes or preferences in genres. He’s talking about logic, about perception, about the fact that making the character dumber than even in anime is the height of absurdity.
The only way to justify this stupidity is a personal fetish—the MC pretends not to understand, thereby provoking feelings of jealousy and adrenaline. In other words, in the story, he chooses to put on the mask of a complete idiot so that the experience feels as intense as possible.
However, the same effect could be achieved using subtler, more literary methods. No need to bring a sledgehammer to swat a fly. Yes, making someone dumb always works. But that’s lazy writing. And this laziness shouldn’t be justified with other tastes or ice cream.
wow this needs to be said more often, and not just in terms of the writing.It isn't necessarily lazy writing
inexperience is more appropriate
people saying this and that are lazy.Yes, making someone dumb always works. But that’s lazy writing. And this laziness shouldn’t be justified with other tastes or ice cream.
then say skill issue? not laziness. but even that label i dont totally agree with.However, the same effect could be achieved using subtler, more literary methods.
I like your response, so here's a "like."You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Hi. Yes, and just above I already explained this... strange situation.It's important to label things properly . It isn't necessarily lazy writing . The writer could just be unaware of how to make it better , so inexperience is more appropriate but regardless I do see the writer trying and putting in effort . So I wouldn't say it's lazy . If you think you can help by pointing them in the right direction of better literary devices then do proceed to do so .