4.20 star(s) 164 Votes

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
687
5,201
579
View attachment 5367368

You missed a zero, it is 90k dollars according to what im seeing. unless pateron is dumb and is trying to show it in my currency but it shows the $ sign instead.

But if it is 90k dollars Le Stag could literally buy my house worth in 2 months which by then they could hire somebody if needed.
God, I wish I'd make 90k a month!

But to be honest, even then, I'm not sure I would hire someone. I enjoy the game being my personal work, my baby, not a content factory made to push more words and more pictures for the sake of it.

You should stop flying high and think about where you came from and who made you what you are.
I did. But thanks for the feedback. I'd have taken it into account had it been constructive, but sadly, it wasn't. You just got hurt by a joke. ;)

Thank you for the reply.
Is it triggered in Ch.50 or in a later chapter? Is it a specific path? cuck, stag?
I hate asking to be outright told... so as few spoilers as possible...
But I've watched, without participating about every way I can think of in Ch.50...
Still not triggered, so I'm missing something...:ROFLMAO:

The in game text says sit on bed, so I don't know if that's the issue, since it's not a chair...idk...:ROFLMAO:
That's why I was thinking Tara in ch43-44, because it was a chair, not the bed... :ROFLMAO:
I might have fucked up somewhere, I'll look into it. ;)
 

Dem5555

Newbie
Aug 19, 2019
38
10
173
There's a scene or two that you have to read carefully or you'll trip that up.
I think it's chapter 29ish? and/or after Nathan fucks her ass, she asks you to creampie her (before Nathan does or in her ass afterward), you of course need to refuse (or choose pussy instead and don't fuck her ass, something like that), the game asks why you didn't creampie her (bulls only, don't deserve it, or someone else do it first)... If you didn't get that choice, you made a mistake in your response(s) before that (at least that's how the cuck routes play out. Never tried condoms on the other routes...lol).

The second, and I think the most likely case, because it's tricky, after Nathan creampie's her (ch43-44), you have to read carefully, because she asks MC to creampie her, too (add to Nathan's). The response choices are a little tricky, because one MC agrees to her request, and if you didn't read, say yes, well...:ROFLMAO:
The other choice is to cum in her mouth. If you don't choose cum in her mouth there, you obviously take off the condom and creampie her as she asked...
She asks this even on the sub-cuck route where she's allowed to break all rules... :ROFLMAO:
I done both. I said I don't deserve it in the first case and I came on her face in second. Still in last update got raw fucking picture.
 

stuffygames

Member
Jul 25, 2025
183
282
63
I've had a similar but opposite issue with the sans condom creampies. I chose to have the MC go raw and creampie her before Nathan, but in the scene where Nathan finally creampies her vajeen, the dialog says this is the first time anyone had ever done it. The MC was first to her go anal with her, I think Nathan was first to creampie her ass, but I could be mistaken.
 

Kabowa

Newbie
Jan 22, 2025
20
26
22
View attachment 5367368

You missed a zero, it is 90k dollars according to what im seeing. unless pateron is dumb and is trying to show it in my currency but it shows the $ sign instead.

But if it is 90k dollars Le Stag could literally buy my house worth in 2 months which by then they could hire somebody if needed.
Yeah thst definitely a patreon bug. It's less lol. If he made those figured I'd have agreed with you

1761214341726.jpeg
 

Baalzie

Member
Aug 18, 2022
314
559
185
Really arrogant words from a developer who earns a fortune from his community. Absolutely zero response to criticism and not even the slightest attempt to implement any changes. I wonder why there were surveys in the past if hardly anything is being implemented.
You should stop flying high and think about where you came from and who made you what you are. A little humility would suit you better than your constant childish responses to criticism.
The game is dead to me, and you have one less subscriber.
[Insert "this is not an airport" comment here]
 

Baalzie

Member
Aug 18, 2022
314
559
185
Looking at the update email from Patreon... I SINCERELY hope i won't see "the return of Oliver" in my game. Since he was booted with no possibility of parole in my playthrough as confident stag. IF Laura would choose to see the guy anyway, in ANY form, it's game over.
Her choice. Trying to write anything saying differently, shoehorning him back in, just means choices means nothing and neither does the tendencies...
Who is this game bro? This is not Netorase phone? Who's this game's name?
I don't think you have any right to complain about other's spelling, grammar, or even words used, mate...
Self blind much?
 

redoubt27

Active Member
Mar 6, 2024
898
1,452
229
I done both. I said I don't deserve it in the first case and I came on her face in second. Still in last update got raw fucking picture.
It helps to know where the issue is…lol
If you have a picture number, can check the guide to see if there’s a variant or not.
 
Jul 8, 2024
222
267
92
Looking at the update email from Patreon... I SINCERELY hope i won't see "the return of Oliver" in my game. Since he was booted with no possibility of parole in my playthrough as confident stag. IF Laura would choose to see the guy anyway, in ANY form, it's game over.
Her choice. Trying to write anything saying differently, shoehorning him back in, just means choices means nothing and neither does the tendencies...

I don't think you have any right to complain about other's spelling, grammar, or even words used, mate...
Self blind much?
I'm not complaining anything bro. Stop being offense.. This's just a joke "who is" part.. I know I should say "what is".. That's just how I describe somethings. Why are you so mocking?
 

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
687
5,201
579
Looking at the update email from Patreon... I SINCERELY hope i won't see "the return of Oliver" in my game. Since he was booted with no possibility of parole in my playthrough as confident stag. IF Laura would choose to see the guy anyway, in ANY form, it's game over.
Her choice. Trying to write anything saying differently, shoehorning him back in, just means choices means nothing and neither does the tendencies...
The issue is that, with the changes, the possibility of removing Oliver from the story will disappear, as it was a crutch for him being insufferable.

So, I can't really keep writing the consequences of a choice that doesn't exist anymore.

And, if I let you keep it out of the story, that means that, again, I cannot use him to make the story progress. So, we go back to having only Nathan helping Laura progress, and him being too predominant. Which is specifically the issue I'm trying to resolve right now.

You will have the possibility to "go back in time" and adjust your choices related to him though, and to see how the character changed.
 
Last edited:

Dlord86

Newbie
Sep 5, 2021
61
70
141
The issue is that, with the changes, the possibility of removing Oliver from the story will disappear, as it was a crutch for him being insufferable.

So, I can't really keep writing the consequences of a choice that doesn't exist anymore.

And, if I let you keep it out of the story, that means that, again, I cannot use him to make the story progress. So, we go back to having only Nathan helping Laura progress, and him being too predominant. Which is specifically the issue I'm trying to resolve right now.

You will have the possibility to "go back in time" and adjust your choices related to him though, and to see how the character changed.
Big props for le stags efforts—rewriting Oliver must’ve been a grind! But losing the option to cut him out kills replay value for dominant stag or any route in general. Could we get a 'veto partner' choice post-intro to keep some control? Thanks!
 

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
687
5,201
579
Big props for le stags efforts—rewriting Oliver must’ve been a grind! But losing the option to cut him out kills replay value for dominant stag or any route in general. Could we get a 'veto partner' choice post-intro to keep some control? Thanks!
Simply said, no.

If you can veto a partner, then that means I cannot use him for important story beats. Every chapter including him would have to be, ultimately, irrelevant to the story, to make it consistent for players that removed him. Which means that I'd have to use a single, mandatory bull for every important event.

Which is what I was doing, and what was the most common complaint about the game. Because people wanted the story to progress, and Nathan was the only one I could make it progress with, you got too much of Nathan.

Basically, if you can remove Oliver from the game, and I use him for a specific kink, you lose the possibility to get to that kink, even if that kink isn't directly tied to who Oliver is.

So, in order to add variety to the bulls, I have to make them mandatory. Or I open myself to a lot more complaints about missed content, story inconsistency, and lack of progression.
 

Antani101

Member
Oct 27, 2021
154
255
139
Le Stag will we get a chance to knock Oliver's disrespect down a peg if we're forced to keep him?

My issue is that he's arrogant and treats the MC with superiority and the chance of saying "hell no, you're not going to bang Laura without my approval" is really important.

Couldn't you leave Oliver like that and introduce a new character?
 

Dlord86

Newbie
Sep 5, 2021
61
70
141
Simply said, no.

If you can veto a partner, then that means I cannot use him for important story beats. Every chapter including him would have to be, ultimately, irrelevant to the story, to make it consistent for players that removed him. Which means that I'd have to use a single, mandatory bull for every important event.

Which is what I was doing, and what was the most common complaint about the game. Because people wanted the story to progress, and Nathan was the only one I could make it progress with, you got too much of Nathan.

Basically, if you can remove Oliver from the game, and I use him for a specific kink, you lose the possibility to get to that kink, even if that kink isn't directly tied to who Oliver is.

So, in order to add variety to the bulls, I have to make them mandatory. Or I open myself to a lot more complaints about missed content, story inconsistency, and lack of progression.
Fair enough—let’s move on then. I’m looking forward to seeing what future updates bring, especially with how the story’s been evolving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Back

Le Stag

Active Member
May 7, 2024
687
5,201
579
Le Stag will we get a chance to knock Oliver's disrespect down a peg if we're forced to keep him?

My issue is that he's arrogant and treats the MC with superiority and the chance of saying "hell no, you're not going to bang Laura without my approval" is really important.
I'll detail it in next week showcase, but you'll have control over how Oliver behaves, and if you allow him to disrespect you.

My focus right now is both on him feeling humiliating enough for people that enjoy that (there's a lot of calling you variations of a "pathetic cuck"), and respectful enough for people that do not, while not becoming the same character as Nathan.

Couldn't you leave Oliver like that and introduce a new character?
I could have. But people voted to have Oliver back in-game, so that's what I'm doing.
 
4.20 star(s) 164 Votes