- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
I have brought it up with him.
He threw a tantrum over that not everyone thinks his game is perfect and flawless.
And how DARE I bring up the fact he's objectively doing/tagging it wrong?
The best I can compare him to is a petulant child that got asked something along the line of "What are you eating? - A apple! - Did you mean a banana? - ... N-No!" and is now making facebook posts about how yellow and slender fruits are apples, and how it's a big conspiracy against him to call them bananas.
He's like a porn variant of Randy Pitchford. REFUSING to admit there was ANY problems at all with Colonial Marines, and how its an amazing 10/10 game that delivered everything it promised.
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
Like... it's not hard to not lie.
There's a dumb amount of games that do that, then gets upset at those playing them. Like, for example: Say a game claims "You play a high school girl!" and then 2 hours in, you find out you're playing a crossdressing dude... or that all the girls are crossdressing dudes.
The "If you don't like it, then don't play it." defense doesn't work when paired with false or misleading information.
Like a certain "You play a succubus. Except you shapeshift into an incubus with 180 flipped personality whenever you are with a girl." game. If they offer X, but can't provide X... they have no right to get upset if people call them out over it.
Like as said in this case: They make a REALLY solid male version. Delivering everything promised.
Then: Offers a "female version", fails to deliver even the more basic, core gameplay. Seemingly not even knowing what "female" means.
This is kinda the exact reason we have tags, categories, reviews and such. Some games are not for everyone. And even in case if someone likes both X and Y. X might be the reason in the first place they sought out the game due to the description.
The one upside with this specific game. Is that it becomes clear VERY fast that it has no female PC a few scenes in. Though, depending on your patience: You might try quite a few before you realize it.
But its at least not a 30+ min tutorial before the "plot twist" xP
- Oct 13, 2018
- 328
- 1,529
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
Shesh, does that muppet still insist to incorrectly call the multiple males mode for "female player"?
He's yet to add a SINGLE scene as a "playable female".
And I see they've yet to add any female genitalia... and still don't use the correct pronouns for their trans characters.
At least its getting updates for the playable males, as always xP So there's plenty content there.
Would just be nice if they stopped falsely advertising it.
He's yet to add a SINGLE scene as a "playable female".
And I see they've yet to add any female genitalia... and still don't use the correct pronouns for their trans characters.
At least its getting updates for the playable males, as always xP So there's plenty content there.
Would just be nice if they stopped falsely advertising it.
- Feb 25, 2018
- 3,816
- 64,548
- Jul 8, 2018
- 844
- 617
Kind of hope so as well, but since the old versions was beta, i don't see those scenes being on this version.
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
You know, there's quite a lot of irony in that it was a beta, that failed in every single conceivable way more or less. (in the "female version") And then, now in the re-release... fucks every single thing up... again. (in said version)
It's like... how shit do you have to be, to utterly fail at a simple task? Twice. Despite dozens of player feedback and corrections?
It's like this guy works for a AAA game company or something xD
- Aug 21, 2017
- 135
- 84
Kattlarv, if you don't like it, then that's fine. No need to bash the work if you dislike it. Just rate it how you want, leave a review, and then move on with your life.
Do you really have to resort to Karenism?
Do you really have to resort to Karenism?
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
FruityBatJosh: Considering they are repeatedly, and continually lying: Yes.
If they pull a "The dragons are coming!" akin to the parody in south park: I will keep calling them out on their bs.
They are straight up advertising something they cannot provide.
Which means that ANY new person that find any of said threads, will go "Oh, cool. I enjoy games with [insert tag] I will check it out!" and then realize they just wasted however X many minutes to hours on something that doesn't even contain the bare minimum of what was promised. It's like the douche nozzle that advertised Colonial Marines. And up to this day: Denies it is anything but a honest, perfect game with no flaws. Or a more recent example: Street Fighter: Was sold with single player on the box. It did not contain ANY single player. That would be added in like, 6 months.
So, call it what you wish. But when this game originally shat the bed due to the creators EXTREME incompetence. (AND: To be clear: This ONLY applies to the "female" version. The male version they somehow magically understand how to tag and advertise correctly. That one is a perfectly functional game. It only har some grammar errors here, along with there calling male characters for females. Without the characters even mention they are trans.) And to top that off, they didn't do it once not twice, but THRICE. And each time they are corrected by someone pointing out their errors, the creator only throws a tantrum and blocks anyone that doesn't rate it 5/5.
This is like... a game that offers you to play as like... Batman or Robin. Except if you pick Robin, you still play as Batman, but Robin is now with you as an AI companion. AND that advertises as being 2 player. Except it does that old-school of "play one life each", and still calls it "co-op split screen". And when confronted only goes "Well, that's OUR definition of co-op split screen!".
Same with games like ex: Panthea, that front and center claims to have "lesbians!" and it's even the games fucking banner. But then when push comes to shove: you play the ENTIRE, grindy ass game. To find out they have nothing but hyper dick porn. And that one, unfinished demo scene WAS the only lesbian on in the entire game. Plus: With an artist too lazy to finish drawing the female genital models. Which ALL could be solved if they were just honest and upfront that the game is exclusively about hyper dick worship. And a game without any choices that is just railroaded. As it has "choices" like a CoD game in that: You can choose to NOT shoot the enemies and never progress past level one.
-
Or TiTS, that offered 4 playable races from the start. Except 3 of them were male exclusive. And they've yet to this day fixed that. Just giving excuses for ~2 years, then switching to "we have to look forward, not backwards".
Or Highschool of Succubus that says you're a succubus. Except the creators definition of a "succubus" is a "shapeshifting incubus".
Or to use a similar example: Crowjob in Space. Where it offers you to play as: a dude, another dude, or: the girl. Except... the creator never created any scenes for the girl. So most NPC's just lamented about "If only you were a guy!". But: She made a *great* NPC if you played either of the dudes since you could then fuck her. (And yes, I am aware she had 1 unfinished scene. But that doesn't help the fact this is the SECOND time she is added to the Crowjob series, without any scenes.) The creator of that AT LEAST had the common decency to know when he was beat and removed her from the latest Crowjob series. Like, it started back when he removed the ability to commission female NPC's into the game since he couldn't do them properly, and made it male NPC exclusive for commissions. And in the latest version: He just stuck to male PC's. He didn't do like this jackass and refuse to admit defeat and make yet ANOTHER "female version" and added even more playable males.
If I'd sum up this game: It is along the lines of: If you play the male PC. You play Metal Gear Solid 5.
If you pick the fake, female PC: You play Metal Gear Survive.
And now, with the update: They have added free DLC content for 5 and removed the always online requirement. And for survive: They realize that giving the player a free save slot was too generous. So they went ahead and deleted that. Save slots are now 4'99. And if you want your save slot restored, it's 19,99. And xp gain has been halved.
And here you are essentially trying to argue that 4'99 isn't that bad.
-
And lets not forget: Commissions are the MAIN way that new characters are added. It's just that: If you pick a male character. You can choose to 1: Pick ANY species you want. 2: Pick ANY body type you want. 3: Choose if they become a PC or NPC. 4: Pick if they service, are serviced or mutual. But if you pick a female: 1: You are restricted to 1 body type. 2: You can't pick species freely. 3: They become a NPC for the male. 4: They service.
This wouldn't be as shit a deal, if the price actually varied. (That said: This is a VERY common practice to offer vastly inferior options for female characters. I mean, heck: "Incompetence is an art style" has become a saying.)
I'd like to say that: People would raise a stink if for example: There was a game called "Super Futa Adventure" or something, and when you played it, you found out after 30-60 minutes that the game contained 0 futa. And when asked, the dev just brushed it off with "I'll add it later." and each update included "I added some more futa scenes." but there was never any. Since they would all "be patched later". But... considering I've seen people purchase multiple "Futa Folio" art packs, that didn't contain a single futa, and no-one but me complained... I'm not confident in saying that there would be a ruckus over it... especially since there are games with the "futa" tag that has no futa. Or games that HAVE futa without the futa tag so... tagging here honestly feels messy. But: I CAN say that: If there's more fake updates to this or other games, I'll keep calling them out. That said: If you know of a way to add/remove tags from a thread: I'd appreciate that, as then I could just do that instead. And this would be solved for several incorrectly tagged games. It's not too much to ask to be able to trust what a game promises to offer.
If they pull a "The dragons are coming!" akin to the parody in south park: I will keep calling them out on their bs.
They are straight up advertising something they cannot provide.
Which means that ANY new person that find any of said threads, will go "Oh, cool. I enjoy games with [insert tag] I will check it out!" and then realize they just wasted however X many minutes to hours on something that doesn't even contain the bare minimum of what was promised. It's like the douche nozzle that advertised Colonial Marines. And up to this day: Denies it is anything but a honest, perfect game with no flaws. Or a more recent example: Street Fighter: Was sold with single player on the box. It did not contain ANY single player. That would be added in like, 6 months.
So, call it what you wish. But when this game originally shat the bed due to the creators EXTREME incompetence. (AND: To be clear: This ONLY applies to the "female" version. The male version they somehow magically understand how to tag and advertise correctly. That one is a perfectly functional game. It only har some grammar errors here, along with there calling male characters for females. Without the characters even mention they are trans.) And to top that off, they didn't do it once not twice, but THRICE. And each time they are corrected by someone pointing out their errors, the creator only throws a tantrum and blocks anyone that doesn't rate it 5/5.
This is like... a game that offers you to play as like... Batman or Robin. Except if you pick Robin, you still play as Batman, but Robin is now with you as an AI companion. AND that advertises as being 2 player. Except it does that old-school of "play one life each", and still calls it "co-op split screen". And when confronted only goes "Well, that's OUR definition of co-op split screen!".
Same with games like ex: Panthea, that front and center claims to have "lesbians!" and it's even the games fucking banner. But then when push comes to shove: you play the ENTIRE, grindy ass game. To find out they have nothing but hyper dick porn. And that one, unfinished demo scene WAS the only lesbian on in the entire game. Plus: With an artist too lazy to finish drawing the female genital models. Which ALL could be solved if they were just honest and upfront that the game is exclusively about hyper dick worship. And a game without any choices that is just railroaded. As it has "choices" like a CoD game in that: You can choose to NOT shoot the enemies and never progress past level one.
-
Or TiTS, that offered 4 playable races from the start. Except 3 of them were male exclusive. And they've yet to this day fixed that. Just giving excuses for ~2 years, then switching to "we have to look forward, not backwards".
Or Highschool of Succubus that says you're a succubus. Except the creators definition of a "succubus" is a "shapeshifting incubus".
Or to use a similar example: Crowjob in Space. Where it offers you to play as: a dude, another dude, or: the girl. Except... the creator never created any scenes for the girl. So most NPC's just lamented about "If only you were a guy!". But: She made a *great* NPC if you played either of the dudes since you could then fuck her. (And yes, I am aware she had 1 unfinished scene. But that doesn't help the fact this is the SECOND time she is added to the Crowjob series, without any scenes.) The creator of that AT LEAST had the common decency to know when he was beat and removed her from the latest Crowjob series. Like, it started back when he removed the ability to commission female NPC's into the game since he couldn't do them properly, and made it male NPC exclusive for commissions. And in the latest version: He just stuck to male PC's. He didn't do like this jackass and refuse to admit defeat and make yet ANOTHER "female version" and added even more playable males.
If I'd sum up this game: It is along the lines of: If you play the male PC. You play Metal Gear Solid 5.
If you pick the fake, female PC: You play Metal Gear Survive.
And now, with the update: They have added free DLC content for 5 and removed the always online requirement. And for survive: They realize that giving the player a free save slot was too generous. So they went ahead and deleted that. Save slots are now 4'99. And if you want your save slot restored, it's 19,99. And xp gain has been halved.
And here you are essentially trying to argue that 4'99 isn't that bad.
-
And lets not forget: Commissions are the MAIN way that new characters are added. It's just that: If you pick a male character. You can choose to 1: Pick ANY species you want. 2: Pick ANY body type you want. 3: Choose if they become a PC or NPC. 4: Pick if they service, are serviced or mutual. But if you pick a female: 1: You are restricted to 1 body type. 2: You can't pick species freely. 3: They become a NPC for the male. 4: They service.
This wouldn't be as shit a deal, if the price actually varied. (That said: This is a VERY common practice to offer vastly inferior options for female characters. I mean, heck: "Incompetence is an art style" has become a saying.)
I'd like to say that: People would raise a stink if for example: There was a game called "Super Futa Adventure" or something, and when you played it, you found out after 30-60 minutes that the game contained 0 futa. And when asked, the dev just brushed it off with "I'll add it later." and each update included "I added some more futa scenes." but there was never any. Since they would all "be patched later". But... considering I've seen people purchase multiple "Futa Folio" art packs, that didn't contain a single futa, and no-one but me complained... I'm not confident in saying that there would be a ruckus over it... especially since there are games with the "futa" tag that has no futa. Or games that HAVE futa without the futa tag so... tagging here honestly feels messy. But: I CAN say that: If there's more fake updates to this or other games, I'll keep calling them out. That said: If you know of a way to add/remove tags from a thread: I'd appreciate that, as then I could just do that instead. And this would be solved for several incorrectly tagged games. It's not too much to ask to be able to trust what a game promises to offer.
- Aug 21, 2017
- 135
- 84
lol someone's mad. xD The fact that you wrote an entire essay just to disagree with me speaks volumes. Not even going to bother reading it. 
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
It also speaks volumes that you're too lazy to read it, after trying to defend it. And "Pointing out irrefutable facts" isn't "disagreeing".lol someone's mad. xD The fact that you wrote an entire essay just to disagree with me speaks volumes. Not even going to bother reading it.
Breaking something down systematically and methodically may be too much for many. But I've been doing this for over a decade. So it's nothing new to me or other critics. Or the people that try to blindly defend shitty practices.
So: Yes. I am a bit mad that this shit is still going on.
The only difference really on doing shit like this, and say: Claiming a product is peanut free, then a kid eats it and ends up in the ER almost dead. Then going "It doesn't have THAT many peanuts!" to try and excuse it. This just happens to be digital. So these things doesn't have dire irl consequences. BUT: They also avoid irl consequences for repeatedly falsely advertising.
- Aug 21, 2017
- 135
- 84
....you're still bothering to argue with people on a porn site? =.=;
- Aug 21, 2017
- 135
- 84
An explanation requires fact and logical reasoning, of which you have neither currently.
- Feb 8, 2019
- 488
- 520
They advertise something they can't deliver. Nor is in the game.
Your "disagreement" is basically: "This game does not contain X, despite claiming it does. - Well, that hurts my feelings to hear!"
You have no leg to stand on aside from that you're upset over evidence, which isn't even something to stand on.
Your "disagreement" is basically: "This game does not contain X, despite claiming it does. - Well, that hurts my feelings to hear!"
You have no leg to stand on aside from that you're upset over evidence, which isn't even something to stand on.
- Aug 21, 2017
- 135
- 84
Who says I'm defending anything or standing on anything? I'm just pointing out your incorrect opinions that you seem to believe are facts.