CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x
Nov 26, 2020
120
59
It is not to be found anywhere, pity because I love her voice and would very much like to hear what other demo she might have done. The two songs are not bad at all actually, and I'm a bit of a rock snob.
I felt the voice was perfect for the song. It brought out the "emotion" so to speak..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lucadiadis

seaoflove

Member
Jan 31, 2023
269
845
*Sighs*
First of all MC was the peep in all those games. IF MC wants someone to peep on them than it would be
  1. some girls boyfriend/relative
  2. some girl who is potential love interest

Now coming to second point so by going your logic if the person is a pornstar than that gives anyone the right to grope or potentially more since they are used to it? You see flaw in your logic. Even if Lena has an exhibition fetish that still doesn't give Stanny boy right to peep that's the reason dev gave the option to Lena whether to stop him peeping or empower him.

There is no way you can justify Stanny boy's peeping.
Stan views Lena as a potential love interest. In "Stans World" Stan is the main character of the game of his life.

This may make me sound hardhearted, or whatever, but there is a huge difference in my minds eye based on the way a person lives / lived their life and how much sympathy they are going to get from me when things go south.

If some random gangbanger gets shot in a drive-by. I won't shed a tear, that is the life he was living.

If some little old lady, or a kid were shot in a drive-by I would feel very sympathetic. That is not the life they were living.

When Steve Irwin, the man who wrestled with crocodiles, and interacted with all sorts of dangerous animals intentionally was swimming in the ocean and a sting ray killed him. He got no sympathy from me. That is the life he was living.

When a random person is on a hike in the woods and a bear attacks and kills them I feel sympathy. That is not the life they were living.

Your example is a porn star. Okay, lets go with that. They are on set. They just got done with shooting a gangbang where 10 guys fucked her in the ass, and then they all came in the same wine glass and made her chug that shit while they were pissing on her face!

Like 20 minutes later after she gets out of the shower a camera man grabs her titty in the halls, and he says, "Great job!"

That is not the same in my book, as if a nun just got done preaching about the vows of chastity and someone grabs her by the tit and says "Great job!"
 

| Vee |

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2022
1,824
4,185
Stan views Lena as a potential love interest. In "Stans World" Stan is the main character of the game of his life.

This may make me sound hardhearted, or whatever, but there is a huge difference in my minds eye based on the way a person lives / lived their life and how much sympathy they are going to get from me when things go south.

If some random gangbanger gets shot in a drive-by. I won't shed a tear, that is the life he was living.

If some little old lady, or a kid were shot in a drive-by I would feel very sympathetic. That is not the life they were living.

When Steve Irwin, the man who wrestled with crocodiles, and interacted with all sorts of dangerous animals intentionally was swimming in the ocean and a sting ray killed him. He got no sympathy from me. That is the life he was living.

When a random person is on a hike in the woods and a bear attacks and kills them I feel sympathy. That is not the life they were living.

Your example is a porn star. Okay, lets go with that. They are on set. They just got done with shooting a gangbang where 10 guys fucked her in the ass, and then they all came in the same wine glass and made her chug that shit while they were pissing on her face!

Like 20 minutes later after she gets out of the shower a camera man grabs her titty in the halls, and he says, "Great job!"

That is not the same in my book, as if a nun just got done preaching about the vows of chastity and someone grabs her by the tit and says "Great job!"
So the rules of law do not apply to all humans equally, (y)!

Someone getting killed and someone getting molested are different why you keep comparing different bits and use murders as example to justify it?

As for the nun and pornstar, I would simply say this. Law doesn't give punishment "Oh you were a pornstar so you getting molested is not as big issue as that nun over their". What kind of bullshit argument is this? You don't feel nothing about pornstar getting molested but you feel for nun, guess what? Law doesn't give a fuck who is getting molested. Every molester has same punishment whether they molest a nun, pornstar or anything other.

What is your basis of even argument here. Law doesn't care about if you feel for the victim or not. The same case of molestation is registered against the molester whether the victim is nurse/stripper/pornstar, etc. There is no law "Oh you are pornstar, sorry, we don't file cases for pornstars getting molested but we do for nuns". Like wtf?

I would drop this conversation here and won't reply to any of this topic anymore. We can discuss something else.

Peace!
 

seaoflove

Member
Jan 31, 2023
269
845
So the rules of law do not apply to all humans equally, (y)!

Someone getting killed and someone getting molested are different why you keep comparing different bits and use murders as example to justify it?

As for the nun and pornstar, I would simply say this. Law doesn't give punishment "Oh you were a pornstar so you getting molested is not as big issue as that nun over their". What kind of bullshit argument is this? You don't feel nothing about pornstar getting molested but you feel for nun, guess what? Law doesn't give a fuck who is getting molested. Every molester has same punishment whether they molest a nun, pornstar or anything other.

What is your basis of even argument here. Law doesn't care about if you feel for the victim or not. The same case of molestation is registered against the molester whether the victim is nurse/stripper/pornstar, etc. There is no law "Oh you are pornstar, sorry, we don't file cases for pornstars getting molested but we do for nuns". Like wtf?

I would drop this conversation here and won't reply to any of this topic anymore. We can discuss something else.

Peace!
My entire argument is Karma.

I don't feel so bad for people that do foolish things that lead to negative consequences for themself.

If you climb in to the lion cage being a fool, it is your own fault. 0 sympathy.

If you are at the zoo and a lion escapes from its cage and attacks you it is not your fault. Much sympathy.

You can say "The law doesn't care if you feel for the victim or not." However, in practice it absolutely does.

A lot of people get a jury nullification based on the circumstances or the case just thrown out altogether.

If you are a stripper giving lap-dances. Expect someone to grab a titty every so often. Even if there is a "No touching rule". You are dancing naked or half naked on a drunk mans lap. Expect it to happen!

If you are a waitress working at a diner, then no, you shouldn't expect anyone to grab your titty. That's much different. You are not sticking your ass in the customers face, and they are not drunk.

Suppose this happened to two women. A waitress and a stripper. I don't see the stripper winning that in any courtroom. No way in hell... The waitress maybe. In all reality neither would see a courtroom and the fella probably just get thrown out or banned.

You don't get to do "Risky Behavior" then complain when something bad happens.

When the man that juggles chainsaws for a living accidentally cuts off his arm... He deserved it!
 

Rustynutone

New Member
Jul 30, 2022
2
336
My entire argument is Karma.

I don't feel so bad for people that do foolish things that lead to negative consequences for themself.

If you climb in to the lion cage being a fool, it is your own fault. 0 sympathy.

If you are at the zoo and a lion escapes from its cage and attacks you it is not your fault. Much sympathy.

You can say "The law doesn't care if you feel for the victim or not." However, in practice it absolutely does.

A lot of people get a jury nullification based on the circumstances or the case just thrown out altogether.

If you are a stripper giving lap-dances. Expect someone to grab a titty every so often. Even if there is a "No touching rule". You are dancing naked or half naked on a drunk mans lap. Expect it to happen!

If you are a waitress working at a diner, then no, you shouldn't expect anyone to grab your titty. That's much different. You are not sticking your ass in the customers face, and they are not drunk.

Suppose this happened to two women. A waitress and a stripper. I don't see the stripper winning that in any courtroom. No way in hell... The waitress maybe. In all reality neither would see a courtroom and the fella probably just get thrown out or banned.

You don't get to do "Risky Behavior" then complain when something bad happens.

When the man that juggles chainsaws for a living accidentally cuts off his arm... He deserved it!
Wow what a victim blaming mentality. Working as a stripper is a decent honest job, not "risky behavior", and going against the rules and touching them without permission is still wrong and the person doesn't "deserve it." What a horrible way to think about people. People like you who say that the strippers should just expect unwanted touching are excusing the molestation happening. There are clear rules in most strip club for a reason and they shouldn't have to deal with getting molested just as much as a waitress or any other person.
Now the gangbanger or any other people actually doing illegal things do deserve whatever pain they get, but by your thought process a firefighter who dies in a fire should get no sympathy because "that's the life they chose." Running into fires is pretty "risky behavior" after all.
 

seaoflove

Member
Jan 31, 2023
269
845
Working as a stripper is a decent honest job, not "risky behavior"
I worked at a strip club as a bouncer for 8 years. I have spent a ton of time in a strip club. I'm going to tell you right now that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Your statement is False. It is the sex positive bullshit that your gender studies professor who never set foot in a strip club will fill young minds with. It is all theory and no practice.

Working as a stripper can indeed involve significant risks and challenges that may not align with the notion of a "decent, honest job" for several reasons:

Social Stigma: Despite efforts to de-stigmatize the profession, society often attaches negative stereotypes to strippers and the adult entertainment industry as a whole. This stigma can lead to discrimination, judgment, and social isolation for individuals working in this field.

Impact on Personal Safety: Stripping often involves interacting with intoxicated or aggressive clientele in dimly lit environments, which can pose significant safety risks for performers. Instances of harassment, assault, and violence are not uncommon in this line of work, further highlighting the dangers associated with the profession.

Impact on Relationships: Working as a stripper can strain personal relationships due to societal judgment, jealousy, and communication challenges. Partners and family members may struggle to understand or accept the profession, leading to conflict and emotional distress.

Exploitative Work Environment: In many cases, strippers may face exploitative working conditions, including low pay, lack of job security, and pressure to engage in activities that they may not be comfortable with, such as providing sexual services or enduring harassment from clients.

Physical and Emotional Risks: Stripping can expose individuals to physical dangers, including assault, harassment, and substance abuse. Moreover, the emotional toll of objectification and the pressure to maintain a certain appearance can contribute to mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem.

Difficulty Leaving the Industry: Exiting the stripping profession can be challenging due to limited transferable skills, ongoing stigma, and barriers to alternative employment opportunities. This can trap individuals in a cycle of dependency on the industry, making it difficult to pursue other career paths or educational opportunities.

Legal and Regulatory Challenges: Depending on the jurisdiction, stripping may involve navigating complex legal frameworks and regulations, including licensing requirements, zoning restrictions, and potential criminalization of certain activities. This legal ambiguity can create uncertainty and vulnerability for individuals working in the industry.

Limited Career Advancement: While some individuals may choose stripping as a temporary or supplemental source of income, the lack of opportunities for career advancement within the industry can hinder long-term financial stability and professional growth.

by your thought process a firefighter who dies in a fire should get no sympathy because "that's the life they chose." Running into fires is pretty "risky behavior" after all.
Heroics are measured by a different bar of conduct than foolishness, greed, or attention seeking.

If my kid is getting attacked by a bear, I'm going to have to step in and put myself between the bear and my kid. I would definitely be sympathetic to anyone in such a situation.

That is not the same thing as me going off the grid, and going to Alaska and trying to be one with the bears like . As for Timothy Treadwell getting my sympathy? Not so much!
 
Last edited:
4.60 star(s) 329 Votes