- Nov 3, 2024
- 5
- 7
im waiting the seymour update only to see if something happen between Lena and Arthur
Of course lol. In my playthrough, lena is pure and in love with ian, supports emma's view, etc, that is until Seymour came and corrupt her. Pretty hot ngl.Bloody degenerate! You actually liked the hand holding didn't you
I definitely liked the Seymour update, as most likely did most Seymour-Lena fans.The hate seems to come mainly from several subsets of fans, who are unable to see the possibilities of not only the Seymour routes, but the Holly, Alison and several Ian toutes also.
The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.What's wrong with seymour update? it's great. Don't kinkshame people lol, it's a corruption fantasy to bait innocent woman with money and hedonism. Especially if it's Emma.
A clear example of this archetype is John from A Mother's Love, where he is vile and a proper antagonist.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
This so much.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
100% true. In short: Seymour has now been relegated to what Ed may have been supposed to be at one point (? - was dropped too early in development to know for sure) and Arthur is now brought back to take over what we expected Seymour to be. All pretty strange but what do I know - maybe there´ll be more twists. It´s not like I really played the Seymour route anyway but with Arthur now in it, I might actually reconsider. Purely for scientific reason, off course.The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.
Could be, mainly debunked by patreons/steams strict guidelines against incest.what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
While the author has done incest content before, that was in a time when Patreon weren't going on a rampage against anyone who dares make this sort of content.what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
I dont think hes the father but i can see Lena mom being Seymour first and only love....what if Seymour is actually Lena's father?
Ian could already fuck Louise, so that ship has been sailed. Ivy's, meanwhile, hasn't even left the port.Going to laugh if Ian gets content with Louise while still never getting any Ivy content. Feels like Eva has a specific grudge against this pairing for whatever reason
Better than that, he got a threesome with her and Lena.Ian could already fuck Louise, so that ship has been sailed. Ivy's, meanwhile, hasn't even left the port.
Hi!The update was a huge letdown and didn't meet many (I assume) if not most players expectations.
Seymour was introduced as a mysterious, enigmatic, sinister man, whose "love" towards Lena is extremely dubious. He presents the corruption part of the game perfectly, in contrast to some other love interests that are vanilla, happy and safe. This was spelt out by Eva multiple times. Seymour is the main antagonist, he is not good. Every conversation was a dance with the unknown of why he would approach Lena and how he would do it.
The other main antagonist is Axel. Eva also went out of their way to delete an early sympathetic side of him and made him even more ruthless and despicable to emphasize the corruption. If Axel embodies the physical corruption, an animalistic predator who physically drags Lena around like a doll, then Seymour is the mental corruptor, someone who manipulates and poisons Lenas mind so much that she falls further and further in depravity on her own, until she makes a move on him because he lets her think its her idea.
And instead we get Seymour awkwardly making a move on her and simply retreating like the simp he is. Unless that is a ploy to make him seem feeble (which I doubt), he and Eva had utterly lost droped the ball with the latest release. The inclusion of Arthur may seem harmless and if its just a cameo it may be, but it was an immediate warning label to me that he is there to make Seymour look milder, meek and "good", to fill in the actual corruption regards prositution that was deemed first in that pointless poll.
So yeah, I want evil Seymour, most of all I want him to be in control. Not the toothless cuck I worry about giving a heart attack whenever I let Lena allow him to fuck him.