Sure, somethings being changed were nice (Jeremy now only getting a brief handy if he isn't with Louise anymore), but at the same time some changes don't make sense at all and should be questioned. Eva has done reworks without any sort of feedback to speak of or even asked for peoples thoughts on the matter, other than her inner circle most likely. Like Wade for example. Out of the blue Wade was reworked to having a job yet not being active in his relationship to now being jobless and not being active in his relationship and likely more at risk of Cinders breaking up with him. Did we really need that change? Not really, as the possible break up could very well have happened naturally with Wade having a job at the time with either them breaking up naturally or Ian and Cinders cheating. Much like the prologue as well, which was entirely fine to begin with, but did we get any mention or post saying she was going to change the prologue? No, we didn't.
My point being, feedback can be a good thing and can help sometimes with developers with certain things or quirks with characters. And sure, this is Eva's game and she can do whatever she wants. Yet to do reworks out the blue without any explaination other than 'I wanted to change X' without user feedback until it's pushed out can get you a lot of flak and issues from fans. Eva lacks in transparity at times, and it can back fire at times. While else would see many people here raise their hands and press the issue?
My only beef was where people routinely dismiss others' concerns or preferred paths to an excessive degree, so I'm actually with you on that one.
