- Apr 12, 2018
- 237
- 460
Well, I was talking about the route where Ian is good to her, and Lena is manipulative. What I'm trying to say is that in that path, it doesn't seem like Lena/the player is able to have any influence over her. That's why I included the latter line in the paragraphIt's hardly the case. Holly can currently have a crush on an absolute piece of shit of a guy, to the point she invites him on a trip with him, lets him fuck her three ways to Sunday, then gets dumped the next morning without even as much as a thank you. It'd be a tall order to paint that as a good decision.
Holly can also be in exclusive relationship with a pretty great guy, and still lust after her friend to the point of getting romantic with her and confusing the hell out of herself over what it is that she really wants. Again, hardly good move making.
-Ian can be a dick to her, retroactively making her crush and decision to sleep with him a bad decision.Having a boyfriend shouldn't make her suddenly impervious to manipulation and corruption.
-Ian and Lena can be romantic to her, leading to the sharing path.
-Ian can also be solely romantic to her.
-Lena can be friendly to her without being romantic.
However, on a path of Ian being good to her, and Lena being slutty/manipulative, Holly seems to default to the Ian solo romantic path. If you follow that story with those decision factors, I think she ends up looking kind of faultless and it's a boring route to play, since Ivy and Lena's influence seems restricted, when having a insecure girl take bad advice from friends isn't a huge leap for the story to realistically take.
I get that it'd be more work but it seems like a natural fit for the game, given the dual perspectives, and factoring in the different player choices. It's just something I would have liked to see included in the story progression, but like I said, I accept that it's not happening.