OsirianObsidian
Newbie
- May 9, 2021
- 51
- 215
I've had a bit of a revelation.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Holy crap, I love this character and thematic analysis! My man just wrote a thesis tying together a BDSM sex game with medieval Christian dogma!!! I mean holy shit, this isn't just the best game on this site. It is also the best thread on this site!I've had a bit of a revelation.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I prefer this more. What I see here is, Mc controlling them through pleasure. He gets what he wants from them by making them dance with his fingers. The girls wouldn't be so obedient during sex if he just pushed his dick inside them. I mean from the outside, does Hana look or act like someone who can be controlled during sex? But Mc plays her like a violin with his fingers and tongue then proceeds to fuck her as he pleases.Isn't the MC more of a Sex Slave for pretty much all the women in the game right now?
I'm not sure I know any other game, in which the focus of the extremely long and intricate sex scenes is generally put on the MC giving pleasure to the women. I mean he is really working them, a lot of the time not even using his dick.
All of the seven sins are natural human impulses that by themselves are not a problem....it's only when they become all consuming that they are considered a sin.I'm not well versed in Christianity. What would be the difference between the three? Mostly asking because you apparently used gluttony and lust in a sexual context and greed in a financial?
I always thought gluttony means only food, lust only sex, and greed can mean anything.
Does Christianity use them more in a 'flavor' way?
My thoughts exactly. I’ve taken great delight in seeing how many times I could get a girl to orgasm - not for their pleasure, but because it turns me on knowing that they are eating out of my hand and their release is predicated on me continuing to do what I’m doing. It’s at that moment when things like edging and orgasm denial come into play, followed by orgasm control.Are we getting close to suggesting that foreplay is femdom? I'll have to remember that when disappointed femdom fans ask why the project has the tag.
Not to sound gay, but gratifying your partner alone can (and should) be a self-fulfilling act. Getting something like a blowjob from a woman who treats it like a chore and is not into giving them is, in my opinion, worse than no oral sex at all. I imagine the same is true for women if you flip the script. That's why in addition to the dramatic liscense, Edwin's inner thoughts trend toward turning foreplay into a personal challenge or game. It's his own selfish take on the notion that there is pleasure in giving pleasure.
(Also, sucking on dem titties is just fucking hot.)
Are we getting close to suggesting that foreplay is femdom? I'll have to remember that when disappointed femdom fans ask why the project has the tag.
Not to sound gay, but gratifying your partner alone can (and should) be a self-fulfilling act. Getting something like a blowjob from a woman who treats it like a chore and is not into giving them is, in my opinion, worse than no oral sex at all. I imagine the same is true for women if you flip the script. That's why in addition to the dramatic liscense, Edwin's inner thoughts trend toward turning foreplay into a personal challenge or game. It's his own selfish take on the notion that there is pleasure in giving pleasure.
(Also, sucking on dem titties is just fucking hot.)
Or rapeWhen it’s parasitic (just one person receiving pleasure at a time), it’s just masturbation.
I was always under the impression that women don't really care much about foreplay if they are turned on already because of the situation and the sex itself is very satisfying for them. Also, I always felt that wanting the girl to have orgasms was more the ego wanting to be boosted than anything else really - plus wanting the power that it brings along.
The paradox thing seems to be, that women kinda get turned on more and get off more easily if the guy is not too focused on their pleasure and just enjoys the thing - instead of being ego-boost needy. I always assumed that this is also the reason so many girls like doggy, since it's the 'just-use-me-like-a-fucking-thing'-position. It's a paradox thing to navigate.
Of course selfless giving is awesome and one of the most reliable sources of joy as well, but I don't really like seeing the sexual variant in fiction - especially since it often seems not really selfless at all, but just about the ego and power, which makes it kinda pathetic to me.
[Additionally, getting pleasure out of giving selfless sexual pleasure seems to me a bit out of character for Edwin, especially if you play him more as a sadist.]
None of the women I've been with have ever been so turned on that they couldn't be bothered with some kissing, groping, fingering, and oral. Sure, sometimes a quickie was the only thing we had time for and all that was needed, but that's always been due to other circumstances, not the sex and arousal.I was always under the impression that women don't really care much about foreplay if they are turned on already because of the situation and the sex itself is very satisfying for them.
As far as "wanting the girl to have orgasms" being a ego boost or a dominance play, that's only part of it sometimes, but I think most people want their sexual partners to enjoy the sex because we want them to feel good and enjoy it. At some point I felt an ego boost from getting my wife off, but I don't any more. Nor do I accrue any more influence over her at this point, either. I do still like that she feels good, sleeps better, and has a more cheerful mood.Also, I always felt that wanting the girl to have orgasms was more the ego wanting to be boosted than anything else really - plus wanting the power that it brings along.
It might not be a paradox. Seems more like confidence is just attractive. The key words you mentioned are "too focused" and "needy". Obviously, those aren't sexy mindsets to bring to the bedroom, but neither is selfish disregard for one's partners' pleasure. People like care and attention, and while the preferred form for that care is individual, unless that partner is a rare hardcore dyed-in-the-wool masochist sub, putting their pleasure at least equal to your own is an important part of that. How much and the reasons why women like doggystyle obviously vary from woman to woman, but my guess is that most of those reasons are more biomechanical than widespread submissive psychology.The paradox thing seems to be, that women kinda get turned on more and get off more easily if the guy is not too focused on their pleasure and just enjoys the thing - instead of being ego-boost needy. I always assumed that this is also the reason so many girls like doggy, since it's the 'just-use-me-like-a-fucking-thing'-position. It's a paradox thing to navigate.
Setting aside all the rest of fiction and narrowing down to just Pale Carnations' Edwin, playing a woman's body like an instrument to the point of ahegao and squirting like a geyser probably is about ego and power for him. And your view that it's pathetic is as valid as any other opinion, but some of PC's themes and content are intentionally distasteful, giving Edwin something to anguish over as he discovers the kind of person he is versus the kind he wants to be versus the kind he feels he is supposed to be. Though I doubt we're going to be reading in the next chapter about Edwin's shame and regret over making Hana lose her mind.Of course selfless giving is awesome and one of the most reliable sources of joy as well, but I don't really like seeing the sexual variant in fiction - especially since it often seems not really selfless at all, but just about the ego and power, which makes it kinda pathetic to me.
We do a little trollingi rmb doing somewhat close to what the MC did buring down shed but much smaller version lucky only label as a mischievous act not as arsonist
I can confidently say you will want to skip our project if you are looking for a VN that is nearing its end date. The two chapters post our initial release took roughly 2 and a half years and we have two chapters remaining, plus the epilogues.Hey, I recently came across this game, and am itching to give it a try. However, I want to hold out until I can see a final end date in sight, have played far too many incomplete games. Does anyone have a rough estimate of when this game might be complete?
Thanks a lot!Yes, there is the walkthrough mod and a pdf walkthrough. They seem both to be updated by the edit-date.
-----
Also, should the mod who removed my off-topic post be the same mod that posted the off-topic derogative post
View attachment 2359975
I knew a lady once who confessed that she liked the position because she was self-conscious about her "sex face".How much and the reasons why women like doggystyle obviously vary from woman to woman, but my guess is that most of those reasons are more biomechanical than widespread submissive psychology.
From my knowledge and what I have been told, doggystyle allows the dick to go far deeper into her than missionary pr sideways, that is why a lot of women enjoy going on top aswell.I knew a lady once who confessed that she liked the position because she was self-conscious about her "sex face".
Of course, no sexual position is inherently dominant or submissive. Like the rest of that post, that particular opinion is more informative about hellohello than the subject matter of the post.
Aah thanks for the reply. I did end up giving in to temptation lol. Enjoying it thus far. Thanks for the game, will definitely stick around for more.I can confidently say you will want to skip our project if you are looking for a VN that is nearing its end date. The two chapters post our initial release took roughly 2 and a half years and we have two chapters remaining, plus the epilogues.