- Thread starter TwistedArchitect
- Start date
How about letting the MC kick some ass instead? Getting tired of seeing the wife doing stuff behind his back..
bulifun
Member
- Sep 15, 2019
- 383
- 671
hmm I love this game but a bit disappointed that the MC ends up getting a threesome regardless of the bad 
choices we make for him
choices we make for him
Adhdclassic
Forum Fanatic
- Mar 10, 2024
- 4,909
- 7,553
Is there no out and out cheating route for the MC , played it a few different ways and I seem to get everything but that which seems odd given how many branches there are in the game
There are dozen of other possibility for ending of this update , but it's basically simplier to solve a Millennium Prize Problems than to access thesehmm I love this game but a bit disappointed that the MC ends up getting a threesome regardless of the bad
BTW there are some mistake in the script :
" amanda "Looks like you should have listened...hahaha. First it was pleasure and now pain."
if BallBusting == True:
scene bg u1_457 with dissolve
"As [wifename] continues biting your shaft, she grabs a hold of your balls and starts squeezing." "
"BallBusting" variable doesnt exist , the variable was "Ballbusting" (without the capital B ) which means you CANNOT access this scene without editing your save file ( and editing renpy file to allow modified .save file to be played )
" amanda "Looks like you should have listened...hahaha. First it was pleasure and now pain."
if BallBusting == True:
scene bg u1_457 with dissolve
"As [wifename] continues biting your shaft, she grabs a hold of your balls and starts squeezing." "
"BallBusting" variable doesnt exist , the variable was "Ballbusting" (without the capital B ) which means you CANNOT access this scene without editing your save file ( and editing renpy file to allow modified .save file to be played )
boulimanus
Active Member
- Jun 10, 2018
- 995
- 1,311
Depends what you consider NTR. Also it is avoidable, but only if you know how.
To make it simple, if you need to ask that question, you won't be able to avoid it.
Shulin
Newbie
- Mar 19, 2018
- 25
- 21
That option is there. You can use it in the club and smash Paolo and his minions
regis nex
Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 399
- 493
Yeah I play these for guilty pleasure where I know my choice sends the wife into a frenzy, but not seeing it kinda defeats the purpose of why I play it.
tq for making this game i first time play and i impress by choice i can make in this game tq DEV
next maybe DEV can add gellery for scene rewatch i love become cuck husband in this story
anyway his wife hot
next maybe DEV can add gellery for scene rewatch i love become cuck husband in this story
anyway his wife hot
An entertaining game with a mind-blowing number of different paths/forks. In that it can rival Eva Kiss' works. On a negative note, there are a lot of typos in variable expressions.
Below is the lines with the typos I have found (in case someone actually needs it)
story/Chapter2
3313, 4960, 4966, 4978
story/p0_1
312, 2242, 2946
story/p5_1
1868, 3005, 3533, 3535, 3578, 3603
story/p1_1
3055, 3118, 4249, 4310, 4726, 5381, 5689, 5729, 6836, 6876, 7096, 7159, 9320, 12809, 12837, 13058, 13081
10784 if MCNoFuck == True: BUT The $ MCNoFuck = True expression is nowhere to be found in the code.
Below is the lines with the typos I have found (in case someone actually needs it)
story/Chapter2
3313, 4960, 4966, 4978
story/p0_1
312, 2242, 2946
story/p5_1
1868, 3005, 3533, 3535, 3578, 3603
story/p1_1
3055, 3118, 4249, 4310, 4726, 5381, 5689, 5729, 6836, 6876, 7096, 7159, 9320, 12809, 12837, 13058, 13081
10784 if MCNoFuck == True: BUT The $ MCNoFuck = True expression is nowhere to be found in the code.
This.... please please with cherry on top a walk-through!!!! There are so many scenes we can't find because we don't know the EXACT sequence of choices to make. Awesome game but knowing there is so much more is frustrating!
On Patreon dev said it's too complicated because of all the pathes and branches and they prefer to spend their time with making it even more complicated.
Okay, that's not exactly what they said, but that's what we (not) get ;-)Really? That would be an unusual standpoint.