So what if the majority get pissed off? Like you've already stated, they'll get pissed off no matter what he chooses.
There are lots of players who are pissed off that Maghda and Vivenatrix don't have way more content.
Does that mean
Tinkerer should just cave in and suddenly make these two characters his current main focus?
Ultimately, it seems that as long as the content that the dev chooses to provide is genuinely good, then that dev will always have supporters.
This certainly seems to be the case for
Summertime Saga (the game that directly inspired my idea of a main girl with side girls) with it's hundreds of patrons.
You've also probably never played a game where you completely agreed with the Dev regarding the attention he was giving certain girls in the game.
In almost every one of these games you've played, you probably wished the Dev would take time away from developing content for one girl, so that he could spend that time on another girl you found to be more favourable.
And I bet
Peasant's Quest is no exception to this.
In the end, my point is that whenever
Tinkerer decides to introduce a new girl into the game and gives that new girl attractive, female companions,
Tinkerer should anticipate players wanting to bang that new girl and her companions.
Then, planning in advance,
Tinkerer can create a couple lewd scenes for those female companions.
And when the players demand more of the female companions who were only meant to be lesser/secondary characters,
Tinkerer can tell them "no."
And they'll learn to deal with it just like how Maghda fans have learned to deal with Maghda just being a minor character.
Or,
Tinkerer can just continue down the route he's always been going - introducing girls with zero female companions.
Either way, we both know we'll both still be playing for a long time to come.