- Jul 2, 2020
- 5,514
- 3,528
Not yet. She dosent have content past getting preg/gifting gold bikini yet
RPGM Peasant's Quest [v3.62] [Tinkerer]
- Thread starter muttdoggy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2d game 3dcg adventure ahegao anal sex animated bdsm big ass big tits cheating combat corruption creampie exhibitionism fantasy female domination groping group sex handjob harem lactation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf monster girl netorare oral sex pregnancy prostitution rpg sex toys spanking teasing titfuck transformation turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
Adding on: Thebreeder1990 There isn't a timeframe, but Tinkerer is going to add it. He intends to get all the existing girls to where they can give birth as a priority in the next few updates. Additional girls might be added as he does that if they "fit in," as with Birgitte for v3.2x/v3.3x.
More Beth content with updated character models (potentially story revisions as well) is on deck for v3.4x. After that, maybe Vixenatrix but no promises.
Am I the only one who thinks Vixenatrix need a total change to her appearance ? She is so lackluster, feels like a reskinned bat lady.
- Jul 2, 2020
- 5,514
- 3,528
You are not the only one to mention this. Personally shes not too bad IMO I'm aware others feel different. While she is in my bottem rung of girls I do appreciate that her design is kinda unique when compared to other shapeshifting dragons (either being busty lizards or straight up human) I like that her form feels "imperfect". I do think the back of her head looks too alien for a fantasy setting lol
IMO she needs hair. That Johnny Sins hairline is the thing that fucks her appeal.
- Mar 24, 2021
- 2,761
- 4,259
prepare those agility potions for the update, you'll gona need it.
Personally, I don't really find ANY of the girls in this game particularly attractive due to the art style used... But, I still appreciate what the game is shooting for even if it's a load of giant turn offs for me personally. Honestly, it's the one thing really stopping me from playing the game...
3.30 test build please
i ill join army after 2 days , for six month fix work.
i want to play !!
i ill join army after 2 days , for six month fix work.
i want to play !!
I get the impression she's young-ish for a dragon, thus the "imperfect" transformation since she hasn't practiced it as much as others. (Some of who might be mingling among humans...)
I like that she's less human in appearance than even BBs, while still appealing to most people. TBH they only thing I would really like changed are her feet. Sure they're digitigrade (walk on the toes) rather than plantigrade (walk on the soles), but they just seem too "delicate" to me. The rest of her model could use some refinement, but IMO doesn't need a complete re-do.
- Jul 18, 2022
- 861
- 406
I think I see where you are coming from, though what you are talking about would mean redesigning her legs right, giving her the backward facing knees birds have... I'm not sure how much difference that would make to her generall appearance though since most of the scene focus on her upper body
I think the biggest issue with her model is her lumpy head, maybe some proper horns instead of these weird lumps (either extending the horns that are there backwards (Ram style, curling back to occupy/obscure that space) or moving them so the lumps are the base of the horns.... What can I say... I don't like my Dragons or my potatoes lumpy
I also wish she had more vibrant skin, I dislike that grey/green tone she has going on, lizards have such a wide range of options (D&D dragons more so), why so dull?
I like how alien and strange vixenatrixs looks. In fact I found it a bit dissapointing how Maghda and Shakala were made more and more pretty over time. There's something kind of kinky about having a couple of characters to bang that aren't conventionally beautiful by human standards.
I agree in that "strange" and "different" are valuable in a game like this (Batbreeder is an excellent example of this), but "not conventionally beautiful" is not the same as "not beautiful". Ultimately it comes down to whether Tinkerer feels the models fulfill his vision for them and I imagine a big part of that is how his players perceive them.
Yup, and that's because beauty, by definition, is purely subjective and rarely, if ever at all, 1:1.
It boils down to whether or not the dev's vision of beauty aligns, or at least can be tolerated by, the individual players.
Take me for example. I... am personally not that big a fan of the game's overall art style/aesthetic myself. It's honestly kind of the big reason I just keep an eye on the game since its content and what it's trying to go for is more my speed even if the art is not.
That being said, and as an amateur artist myself, I can totally appreciate and respect the vibe the dev's trying to make. Heaving western style fantasy with a splash of embellished realism. Has a comic vibe to it even, or maybe something you'd see in book illustrations. Not really my thing since I freely admit I have more weebish to more conventional tastes but meh.
I'm actually okay with how her lower legs & feet are shaped, they're almost like someone in high heels. Just that below the calf they seem to get too thin to me. I think a 25-33% increase in thickness/width (not length, that's good) would do the trick in my eyes.I think I see where you are coming from, though what you are talking about would mean redesigning her legs right, giving her the backward facing knees birds have... I'm not sure how much difference that would make to her generall appearance though since most of the scene focus on her upper body
I think the biggest issue with her model is her lumpy head, maybe some proper horns instead of these weird lumps (either extending the horns that are there backwards (Ram style, curling back to occupy/obscure that space) or moving them so the lumps are the base of the horns.... What can I say... I don't like my Dragons or my potatoes lumpy
I also wish she had more vibrant skin, I dislike that grey/green tone she has going on, lizards have such a wide range of options (D&D dragons more so), why so dull?
Not a bad idea about reshaping the horns to make the skull bulge less noticeable. As for coloration he could always add another dragon with a different shade later...
Last edited:
You can direct your disappointment to the player base who requested/advocated/pestered Tinkerer for the changes.
Earlier Maghda was not appealing to me at all, now I find her 'uglycute'. I actually prefer earlier Shakala to the more humanlike version.
My point was that I really dislike that shade
on one hand it is grey and dull, on the other it is a nausea inducing shade of green . She's a Dragon, she could have been a Glorious Gold, an Electric Blue, a Fierce Red, a Frosty White...I don't remember changes made to Shakala, does anyone have a side by side example of how her model changed?