RPGM Peasant's Quest [v3.62] [Tinkerer]

[Damagus01]

There used to be a warning in the game, I don't know if it's still there.

During "Get Past Granny" you can choose whether Mia is fucked by a werewolf the first time she wears the red riding hood outfit. That's the only 'warning' I can think of.

Flood69 How much there is depends on what you count as NTR. Some people count any time a LI gets it on with anyone who isn't the MC, full stop. Others look at circumstances & motivation. Some don't count stealing someone else's girl as NTR. And so on. PhineasFlynn gave a good list of what might be NTR depending on how you define it. But, yes, there is no single switch for it but you can avoid all of it. Be aware, some side LI storylines *require* NTR of some sort to advance them...avoiding it means not pursuing them, or not advancing the storyline past a certain point...

 

[storm1051787]

During "Get Past Granny" you can choose whether Mia is fucked by a werewolf the first time she wears the red riding hood outfit. That's the only 'warning' I can think of.

Flood69 How much there is depends on what you count as NTR. Some people count any time a LI gets it on with anyone who isn't the MC, full stop. Others look at circumstances & motivation. Some don't count stealing someone else's girl as NTR. And so on. PhineasFlynn gave a good list of what might be NTR depending on how you define it. But, yes, there is no single switch for it but you can avoid all of it. Be aware, some side LI storylines *require* NTR of some sort to advance them...avoiding it means not pursuing them, or not advancing the storyline past a certain point...

I can't really think of any that "require" ntr unless we're talking about ones where mc is the one ntring people.

 

[Damagus01]

I can't really think of any that "require" ntr unless we're talking about ones where mc is the one ntring people.

Yes, that's the "it depends on the individual's definition" part. Better to mention it, than not and get complaints of "why didn't you say you had to NTR someone to pursue [girl]?"

 

[r2250480]

Those quests don't impact the content added in 3.62.
Spicy and Gnomes don't impact Vixenatrix's content. Also, those are the only mods which are safe to use with the game, use other mods at your own risk.

Did you already visit the hatching grounds? IIRC if you do that before Hot Gossip starts it never happens at all, it's meant to point you towards seeing her again.*

Vixenatrix's dialogue when you see her after Hot Gossip starts suggests it's not available until after she actually lays her egg(s). So the day after Day 20 or later. But I think I saw something where if you use saves from an earlier version you might need to sleep several nights (5?) to trigger it.


*Personally I would have liked a quest from Jacob to fetch more sheep from Greyport. Having a full flock again the very next day seems off to me. But that would require making a business in Greyport to buy them from and I don't think the Pet Shop would fit the bill.

Okay. Now I'm confused. Could you please explain what you mean by " Did you already visit the hatching grounds? IIRC if you do that before Hot Gossip starts it never happens at all, it's meant to point you towards seeing her again."?

If by "the hatching grounds" you mean her lair with all the gold, then there's nothing there.
After 10 days in the new version, I visited her in her lair and there's still no mention of her egg(s) being laid or any change in dialogue (options) compared to the previous version. The villagers have no change in dialogue either.

 

[storm1051787]

Yes, that's the "it depends on the individual's definition" part. Better to mention it, than not and get complaints of "why didn't you say you had to NTR someone to pursue [girl]?"

Frankly because 99% of the time when people ask about ntr that's not what they mean. When you say there is unavoidable ntr people think the thing with the werewolf first before they think about the mc stealing someone's girl. If you're saying you have to steal someone elses girl you should say that's what you mean instead of leaving it vague.

 

[PhineasFlynn]

During "Get Past Granny" you can choose whether Mia is fucked by a werewolf the first time she wears the red riding hood outfit. That's the only 'warning' I can think of.

Im pretty sure there was warring on Shakalas wedding too.

 

[Damagus01]

Okay. Now I'm confused. Could you please explain what you mean by " Did you already visit the hatching grounds? IIRC if you do that before Hot Gossip starts it never happens at all, it's meant to point you towards seeing her again."?

If by "the hatching grounds" you mean her lair with all the gold, then there's nothing there.
After 10 days in the new version, I visited her in her lair and there's still no mention of her egg(s) being laid or any change in dialogue (options) compared to the previous version. The villagers have no change in dialogue either.

There's a separate area you go to where she lays her eggs. How long has she been on Day 20 now?

 

[r2250480]

There's a separate area you go to where she lays her eggs. How long has she been on Day 20 now?

For multiple versions now. Safe to say it's been 50 days at least. 15 since I ported to the newest version

 

[Damagus01]

Im pretty sure there was warring on Shakalas wedding too.

It's a choice menu, the dialogue explains what's up. Not really a warning about something that's still in the future like during "Get Past Granny."

 

[Damagus01]

For multiple versions now. Safe to say it's been 50 days at least. 15 since I ported to the newest version

Okay, that's very odd. Did you maybe originally steal the gem and later use the reset to see her on good terms? How many in-game days since you ported to the new version (since she was already on Day 20 at that point)?
EDIT: Have you edited the game files? That can break stuff including things that don't seem related to what's being changed.

 

[r2250480]

was on day 334 when porting. Am on day 356 now.
Don't know about the gem. That must've been over a half year ago.
Here's my current save changed from .rpgsave to .txt (for uploading) maybe that helps somehow?

 

[r2250480]

Okay, that's very odd. Did you maybe originally steal the gem and later use the reset to see her on good terms? How many in-game days since you ported to the new version (since she was already on Day 20 at that point)?
EDIT: Have you edited the game files? That can break stuff including things that don't seem related to what's being changed.

I think I've increased some stats at the start of the game, way back in the day...
Anyway to fix that or should I start over from the beginning then?

 

[Damagus01]

I could've increased some stats way back in the day...
Anyway to fix that or should I start over from the beginning then?

Hold off until someone has a chance to check your save. There might be a simple fix.
You could also go to the game's discord, their Help channel is public.

 

[Pdoan]

Yes, that's the "it depends on the individual's definition" part. Better to mention it, than not and get complaints of "why didn't you say you had to NTR someone to pursue [girl]?"

To be honest, "individual definition" is what need to go.

 

[Pdoan]

For multiple versions now. Safe to say it's been 50 days at least. 15 since I ported to the newest version

Vix only be able to lay her egg recently (version 3.6x). It's normal.

was on day 334 when porting. Am on day 356 now.
Don't know about the gem. That must've been over a half year ago.
Here's my current save changed from .rpgsave to .txt (for uploading) maybe that helps somehow?

I don't see anything wrong with your save. May be you shoud sleep sometimes.

After sleeping, talk to the inn keeper in Weirdwood

Go see Vix


Edit: tested in game version 3.62 with Spicy and Gnome mods.

 

[r2250480]

Okay. So. When porting your www folder from an old release to a newer release it's handy to not let the old www overwrite the files in the new www. *groans*
Sorry for the kerfuffle guys and thanks for the help.
Lesson learned

 

[Pdoan]

I ususally don't "port the old www", just the "save". "www" has so many important files the you are better using the most up-to-date.

 

[Stil996]

Okay. So. When porting your www folder from an old release to a newer release it's handy to not let the old www overwrite the files in the new www. *groans*
Sorry for the kerfuffle guys and thanks for the help.
Lesson learned

Why are you porting the entire WWW folder in the first place? I'm really confused why you'd feel motivated to try that at all.