- Oct 17, 2018
- 125
- 101
If you want content for this I suggest investing in cryogenics, freezing yourself. Im thinking of doing it so I can get sunhorse content.
This is something they're working on right now. I've already got the script and most of the art finished for it. Just waiting on some character sprites.I also wonder: when can we repeat the bed scene like the BJ on the roof?
Isn't the difference between a person and an animal the possession of consciousness?The characters are anatomically correct, so i think we are missing a bestiality tag '-'
If you're going to describe bestiality as sex with an animal, then sex between to humans could be included as it's two animals. The female characters in this clearly fall under neither monster girl nor furry (as they have zero anthropomorphic characteristics, fully pony anatomy), thus it would be sex between a person and an animal, albeit an intelligent animal. When people look for content with bestiality, I seriously doubt they're thinking about if it's with something of a low enough intelligence and more about if it's with something that has animal sex parts. Pretty sure this is a clear case of needing a bestiality tag.Isn't the difference between a person and an animal the possession of consciousness?
The site rule about the Bestiality tag doesn't say anything about anatomy.
On the other hand the game has both the Furry and the Monster Girl tags - the latter explicitly excluding animals from its category.
for ref:
Bestiality [A sex act between a person and an animal. (Not monsters, aliens...).]
Furry [Anthropomorphic animal (Not to be confused with monster or humans with animal ears/tails).]
Monster Girl [Any female sentient being that is not human, robot, animal, or furry. e.g trolls, orcs.]
Is it though? Ignoring the holes, your argument still depends on your definitions of 'animal' and 'person'. If we disregard any other criteria, go by kindergarten logic and only take into account shapes and forms, then sure the love interest characters look somewhat like animals.If you're going to describe bestiality as sex with an animal, then sex between to humans could be included as it's two animals. The female characters in this clearly fall under neither monster girl nor furry (as they have zero anthropomorphic characteristics, fully pony anatomy), thus it would be sex between a person and an animal, albeit an intelligent animal. When people look for content with bestiality, I seriously doubt they're thinking about if it's with something of a low enough intelligence and more about if it's with something that has animal sex parts. Pretty sure this is a clear case of needing a bestiality tag.
Wild life has beastiality tag yet no actual realistic animals there. Here there are realistic shetland style ponies some have horns some have wings and some just have normal fur. Same as the genitals they are identical to the horse breed not anthro or furry they would be more human if that was the case. plus the original game this is based on Banned from equestria, a horse avatar was used on purpose to get around the beastiality tag, dont know why it didnt happen here would make sense.And I think that there should not be such a tag, only action with real, primitive animals from Earth should be the "bestiality".
Those mlp ponies absolutely do not look like real horse.
Em.. Just checked, Wild Life doesn't have this tag. On f95zone at least.Wild life has beastiality tag yet no actual realistic animals there.
apologies then it used to have that tag. But it doesnt distract from the fact there are many games out there with fantasy critters where there is beastiality tags used because one of the critters resembles a real life animal. Same should go for this one.Em.. Just checked, Wild Life doesn't have this tag. On f95zone at least.