Men spend most of there time supressing or controling our more aminmalstic impulses.
That depends on how one defines 'suppressing'. Sure, they don't act on them, but that is largely because they are afraid of the consequences, rather than because they are successfully suppressing the desire itself. I think 'resisting' is the word you are looking for.
Also, of course, we don't suppress all of our animalistic impulses - only those where we foresee consequences we fear, and since a fear response is about as base and animalistic impulse as exists, that too is merely succumbing to our base impulses.
Do you resist the impulse to sleep, to have sex with a willing mate, to eat? Only when some kind of fear is added.
It is also why we are more likely to cheat.
The need to spread our seed is very powerfull.
Not quite. That's simply an evolution-honed survival trait of a different order. Cheating and harems have nothing to do with domination. Showing off your harem to other men is, of course, a means to show dominance over those men. A true harem, of course, means providing food, housing, clothing, entertainment and satisfaction with life to multiple women at a time - and that is pretty expensive. A harem therefore demonstrated wealth - but that demonstration was to those outside of the harem.
In simple biological terms, one man can impregnate an entire village of women to preserve the species, should something kill off the other men. Meanwhile except for relatively rare situations of multiple ova being fertilized by more than one mate's semen, a woman gets pregnant by only one man at a time. There's no biological advantage to the woman who continues to mate with more than necessary to produce a child. But there is a biological advantage to the male that impregnates multiple women at a time - since there will be more of his genes in the next generation.
It has nothing to do with 'domination' or subservience, just breeding. It is therefore a red herring to any discussion of domination.
I said most men seek to dominate woman not all men.
I'm not sure where you got that statistic. I'm a marketer who's worked the adult industry in various niches, from regular porn in the 90s, through to sex toys, escorts, and dating, and I can tell you that it doesn't match the actual traffic data or customer profiles.
Big woman is popular because the woman entire entirely depended on the men.(food, moving, etc)
Again it is a we to have power over woman.
You've gone to the most extreme end of a very wide spectrum. However, you've also indicated there that you have never had a dependant - it is hard work and expensive. Wait til you have kids and see what the bills are like.
In much of the world, even today, and with literal millennia of history to match, the epitome of the wealthy man was the rotund, slightly over-fed one. We literally associate being a little overweight with wealth and pampering, while we associate skinniness with poverty, illness, and lack of care.
Buddha is generally portrayed as fat, the embodiment of wealth and happiness.
Santa is portrayed as fat and merry - just what earlier society expected someone who gave strangers gifts would look like.
That has been changing only really in the last 60 years, as more people have more time to spend in the gym, as advances in freight speeds and freezing foods have meant a diet can be far wider than just what is available from local producers, and as movies and magazines have changed what they display as a 'perfect' body.
Evolution doesn't work in decades. Most of our instincts are still designed for a prehistoric past where we needed to run away from beasts that could eat us, and where if we didn't breed young, (i.e. have a drive to breed at the earliest opportunity presented), we probably would never pass on our genes at all because of the mortality rate.
